brudda Ope retweeted
Plenty advice. No workings. Where is your wife?
brudda Ope retweeted
First of all, in La Liga you would have to get rid of 70% of your players due to FFP rules. You can freely spend in France because the state allows you to do so.
brudda Ope retweeted
you claim to be a pastor yet openly harbour disdain for people simply because they practise a different religion, so much so that you seem to believe they have no right to seek public office in a free society.
worse still, you boldly express and defend this prejudice, not based on their character, competence or policies, but solely on their religious beliefs. the irony is astounding.
brudda Ope retweeted
She released a +1 poll in October for fundraising purposes, but secretly her real internals were way rosier. She didn’t release those to avoid attracting big GOP spending.
Lmao. Smart strategy.
Semafor: Annie Andrews knew she was winning in October — but kept the poll secret
On Oct. 5, the Andrews campaign received a poll showing her with a 3-point lead over Graham. But the Democrat’s campaign decided against publicly releasing the poll — or any subsequent internal poll — showing Andrews with a lead over Graham, wary of drawing too much attention from national Republicans and jeopardizing a peak at the right time, according to Chas Goldman, a strategist for Andrews.
semafor.com/article/11/04/20…
brudda Ope retweeted
This is how misinformation spreads.
Egypt’s 2014 electoral framework introduced affirmative-action provisions to guarantee representation for historically underrepresented groups in its first parliamentary elections under the new Constitution.
Under Section 5 of Law No. 46 of 2014, electoral lists were required to include a minimum number of Christian candidates, alongside designated places for young people, workers and farmers, persons with disabilities and women.
Specifically, 24 of the 120 seats allocated to the electoral-list system were reserved for Christian candidates. This did not impose a ceiling on the number of Christians who could enter parliament. They could also contest and win seats through individual elections.
Following the 2015 elections, Coptic Christians won 36 seats, representing approximately 6% of parliament.
Yet this man has mistaken the approximately 6% achieved in the election for a statutory maximum on Coptic parliamentary representation.
There is a difference between a minimum representation requirement and a maximum allocation. You don’t need to misinform others please
brudda Ope retweeted
History for Alexander Zverev:
He becomes the first man to lose his debut match as world No.1 in straight sets! 🔥




















