Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn) header
Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn) profile picture

Global news editor and reporter for hire. Previously Quartz, The National, USA Today, CNN. Let's connect 👋 He/him, deaf. Remember we share the same moon.

Brooklyn
Joined April 2010
Photo by Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn)Photo by Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn)Photo by Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn)Photo by Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn)Photo by Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn)Photo by Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn)Photo by Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn)Photo by Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn)Photo by Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn)Photo by Patrick deHahn (@patrickdehahn)
Let's connect if you know of opportunities in journalism, communications, humanitarianism, or anything interesting in mission-oriented work. My website is at patrickdehahn.com. linkedin.com/in/patrickdehah… Securely message pdeh.99 on Signal I'm also at pdehello.bsky.social
2
1
1
3
2,166
Patrick deHahn retweeted
I don’t know. It feels obscenely stupid to start posting videos of my loved ones in Gaza right now, as their tents flood with rainwater in the middle of the night, as they sleep in damp clothes on soaked mattresses, and to think for a f*cking second that these images might move someone to save their babies, to protect what little dignity they have left. As if this time could be any different from last year, or the year before that, or the year before that. As if people around the world, especially those with the power to do something, might suddenly be moved by a family’s tent flooding with rainwater when the sight of hundreds of babies whose bodies were shredded by Israeli bombs was not enough to put an end to this. How many more times must we expose the suffering of the people we love, strip them of their privacy in their most vulnerable moments, in the desperate hope that someone, somewhere, might finally care enough to act?
68
1,688
51
3,861
105,668
Patrick deHahn retweeted
Is this a joke? Its completely undignified. The host should ask him for his reflections on killing 168 schoolchildren and teachers in Minab.
Listen to the first full episode of CENTCOM's new podcast "Inside CENTCOM" — out now on podcast platforms or on YouTube: youtube.com/@centcom
12
66
1
552
14,812
Patrick deHahn retweeted
Israeli military activity past 24 hours seen as an escalation - multiple drones over Beirut southern suburbs &city center; stun grenade dropped close to #Lebanon army checkpoint north of occupied village of Mansouri; first targeted assassination in 2 months -
4
88
5
120
14,460
I took a look at what the fully-internal cochlear implant (by MED-EL) means for deaf people and, more widely, the neurosensory space in my latest report for Medscape medscape.com/viewarticle/fir…
41
Patrick deHahn retweeted
Actual results aside, it does not seem healthy for a country to swing to radically every two years. Horrendous for any long-term policy.
750
1,410
456
41,443
1,633,397
Patrick deHahn retweeted
I’ve seen enough: generational wipeout.
232
4,401
210
34,812
1,786,379
Patrick deHahn retweeted
This
Voters are rejecting Islamophobia a lot louder than many people in national media
1
3
16
1,066
Patrick deHahn retweeted
In my decade of journalism, I don't think I've ever seen a job posting for a reporter covering Iran and its people that requires fluency in Farsi/Persian. Better late than never
Come work for the best Middle East team in journalism. We have a new opening for a Farsi-speaking reporter in Dubai to join an Iran reporting team that breaks news about and explains the Islamic Republic to our millions of readers. Apply here. wsj.jobs/dubai-are/mideast-c…
1
16
172
11,625
CNN: DEMOCRATS WIN BACK CONTROL OF CONGRESS
50
Patrick deHahn retweeted
Trump won’t like this statement from Vance.
"The reason we lost is the war" on Iran, US vice president JD Vance says in a post about the results of the midterm elections
1
2
383
"The reason we lost is the war" on Iran, US vice president JD Vance says in a post about the results of the midterm elections
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
1
445
I've been up since 3:30AM for election poll work at a Brooklyn site and it was a long day with closing. So I'm off to bed. Everyone rest well.
2
1
6
267
FYI I've served as a poll worker for multiple elections since 2020. Thanks to all of the nation's election poll workers this season 🗳
19
4
5
1,085
NY Times: “They’re in control, but they’re not in control," US president Donald Trump said about projected Democrat Congressional control in a Fox News interview nytimes.com/live/2026/11/03/…
110