
This was the livetweeting account for @pfanderson. Have been locked out & am unable to access help from @TwitterSupport Librarian, LongCOVID March 2020
Ann Arbor
Joined September 2010
- Tweets39.9K
- Following2.3K
- Followers563
- Likes26.5K
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
1) There's a new critical review of patient-reported outcome measures in ME/CFS and Long Covid.
The paper argues that trials often fail to include important symptom domains such as post-exertional malaise, dysautonomia and mast cell activation symptoms.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
If you are a parent in the US and have not gotten your kids their COVlD and flu booster shots yet, now is the time.
The past two years, the rollout of available COVlD boosters has gone slowly and with confusion, so I will answer a few common questions.
1. Are my kids eligible?
▪️Children 6 months and older are eligible.
▪️A prescription from a physician generally is not needed.
▪️You generally do not need to attest to your child having a high risk medical condition. That is not required by the CDC.
▪️Note that the implementation of this general guidance may vary by state and pharmacy. Most pharmacies have now worked through the rollout confusion.
2. What options are available?
▪️Moderna (Spikevax): Ages 6 months and up
▪️Pfizer (Comirnaty): Ages 5 years and up
▪️Moderna (mNexspike): Ages 12 years and up
▪️Novavax (Nuvaxovid): Ages 12 years and up
Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA-based, whereas Novavax is a protein subunit (non-mRNA) option. The biggest advantage to Novavax is that current evidence indicates fewer common short-term reactions (e.g., fatigue, headache, injection-site discomfort); the evidence is primarily from adults though. There is no robust comparative effectiveness evidence to date suggesting one option works better than the others; over time, such evidence may emerge, but findings have been mixed thus far, at times even within individual studies.
3. Does COVlD still matter?
▪️Yes, it matters for children. In addition to the importance of reducing acute infections, anyone can develop chronic health problems after any SARS-CoV-2 infection, commonly called Long COVID or post-acute sequelae. Updated boosters can reduce infection risk, urgent care use, and emergency care use, especially in the initial months after boosting. Protection wanes, and the level and durability of protection against infection vary. Especially during waves, additional protection from infection is useful. The studies are mixed as to whether the boosters reduce the chances of Long COVlD among people who get infected, with some suggesting a benefit, and others suggesting no discernible benefit among those infected. The benefit remains even if purely on the side of reducing infection chances.
▪️Yes, it matters for families, schools, and communities. Each infection prevented can stop a forward chain of transmission that can lead others in the family, school, and community to get COVlD. That is helpful for family economics so people are not missing work and beneficial for overall public health. Americans have experienced a steady rise in disability since pandemic onset that continues in 2026. Moreover, people continue to die of COVlD, at lower rates than the first two years since pandemic onset, but often these deaths have shifted to the post-acute phase, months or years after infection. These deaths often show up as heart attacks, excess deaths among people already battling a significant health condition (e.g., cancer, organ damage), and various other causes.
4. Will the COVlD boosters prevent all infections?
▪️No. When scientists use the word "prevent," they often mean "reduce the overall risk of." For example, seatbelts prevent car accident fatalities. This is a poor word choice in public health communication because many assume "prevent" means "stop all risk of." The boosters are not a panacea. They are a good tool and one of the easier tools for reducing risk.
▪️The most effective way to reduce risk of COVlD is to use layered prevention. That includes boosters, wearing well-fitting high-quality masks (for children, a Flo Mask or vetted, well-fitting KN95/KF94 like those sold by Wellbefore and others), using air purifiers, testing, and staying home when sick. These interventions are costly to families, which is why they warrant public funding.
5. Would you get your kids boosted?
▪️Yes. For the reasons noted above, it is the easiest option for reducing risk.
6. Where can my kids get boosted?
▪️Retail chains like Walgreens that have actual in-house pharmacies offer boosters, typically to children 3 years and older. If scheduling through their website, one can often schedule multiple kids for the same appointment time. Local policies and practices may vary.
▪️If seeking out Novavax, Costco is a good option, including for non-members. The major retail chains sometimes carry it. If you talk to a pharmacist, you may need to refer to it as Nuvaxovid.
▪️Children who are covered by Medicaid, uninsured, underinsured, American Indian, or Alaska Native may be eligible to get boosted through the Vaccines for Children Program.
7. What else should I know?
▪️If you and your children do not regularly mask, a pharmacy appointment is a wise place to do so. Often, the booster waiting area is the same place where people are picking up medications for acute illness. Nobody wants to get sick while getting a booster.
▪️Since children under 2 cannot mask, ask a pediatrician to offer the booster outdoors or at the first appointment of the day while those who can mask do so.
8. Do you have any financial conflicts of interest?
▪️No. I do not receive any revenue from any COVlD-related product or business. Scientists must report this to universities annually. I do not accept pharma funding ether. The CMS Open Payments Data directory remains useful for tracking pharma-related funding.
Links in next. Please provide any follow-up questions and feedback on anything that has worked well or gone poorly.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
Our family got Nuvaxovid last month. This week: Sanofi’s Flublok… an egg-free recombinant flu shot.
Trials have found stronger antibody responses than standard egg-based vaccines.
Ask pharmacies about your options.
If you are a parent in the US and have not gotten your kids their COVlD and flu booster shots yet, now is the time.
The past two years, the rollout of available COVlD boosters has gone slowly and with confusion, so I will answer a few common questions.
1. Are my kids eligible?
▪️Children 6 months and older are eligible.
▪️A prescription from a physician generally is not needed.
▪️You generally do not need to attest to your child having a high risk medical condition. That is not required by the CDC.
▪️Note that the implementation of this general guidance may vary by state and pharmacy. Most pharmacies have now worked through the rollout confusion.
2. What options are available?
▪️Moderna (Spikevax): Ages 6 months and up
▪️Pfizer (Comirnaty): Ages 5 years and up
▪️Moderna (mNexspike): Ages 12 years and up
▪️Novavax (Nuvaxovid): Ages 12 years and up
Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA-based, whereas Novavax is a protein subunit (non-mRNA) option. The biggest advantage to Novavax is that current evidence indicates fewer common short-term reactions (e.g., fatigue, headache, injection-site discomfort); the evidence is primarily from adults though. There is no robust comparative effectiveness evidence to date suggesting one option works better than the others; over time, such evidence may emerge, but findings have been mixed thus far, at times even within individual studies.
3. Does COVlD still matter?
▪️Yes, it matters for children. In addition to the importance of reducing acute infections, anyone can develop chronic health problems after any SARS-CoV-2 infection, commonly called Long COVID or post-acute sequelae. Updated boosters can reduce infection risk, urgent care use, and emergency care use, especially in the initial months after boosting. Protection wanes, and the level and durability of protection against infection vary. Especially during waves, additional protection from infection is useful. The studies are mixed as to whether the boosters reduce the chances of Long COVlD among people who get infected, with some suggesting a benefit, and others suggesting no discernible benefit among those infected. The benefit remains even if purely on the side of reducing infection chances.
▪️Yes, it matters for families, schools, and communities. Each infection prevented can stop a forward chain of transmission that can lead others in the family, school, and community to get COVlD. That is helpful for family economics so people are not missing work and beneficial for overall public health. Americans have experienced a steady rise in disability since pandemic onset that continues in 2026. Moreover, people continue to die of COVlD, at lower rates than the first two years since pandemic onset, but often these deaths have shifted to the post-acute phase, months or years after infection. These deaths often show up as heart attacks, excess deaths among people already battling a significant health condition (e.g., cancer, organ damage), and various other causes.
4. Will the COVlD boosters prevent all infections?
▪️No. When scientists use the word "prevent," they often mean "reduce the overall risk of." For example, seatbelts prevent car accident fatalities. This is a poor word choice in public health communication because many assume "prevent" means "stop all risk of." The boosters are not a panacea. They are a good tool and one of the easier tools for reducing risk.
▪️The most effective way to reduce risk of COVlD is to use layered prevention. That includes boosters, wearing well-fitting high-quality masks (for children, a Flo Mask or vetted, well-fitting KN95/KF94 like those sold by Wellbefore and others), using air purifiers, testing, and staying home when sick. These interventions are costly to families, which is why they warrant public funding.
5. Would you get your kids boosted?
▪️Yes. For the reasons noted above, it is the easiest option for reducing risk.
6. Where can my kids get boosted?
▪️Retail chains like Walgreens that have actual in-house pharmacies offer boosters, typically to children 3 years and older. If scheduling through their website, one can often schedule multiple kids for the same appointment time. Local policies and practices may vary.
▪️If seeking out Novavax, Costco is a good option, including for non-members. The major retail chains sometimes carry it. If you talk to a pharmacist, you may need to refer to it as Nuvaxovid.
▪️Children who are covered by Medicaid, uninsured, underinsured, American Indian, or Alaska Native may be eligible to get boosted through the Vaccines for Children Program.
7. What else should I know?
▪️If you and your children do not regularly mask, a pharmacy appointment is a wise place to do so. Often, the booster waiting area is the same place where people are picking up medications for acute illness. Nobody wants to get sick while getting a booster.
▪️Since children under 2 cannot mask, ask a pediatrician to offer the booster outdoors or at the first appointment of the day while those who can mask do so.
8. Do you have any financial conflicts of interest?
▪️No. I do not receive any revenue from any COVlD-related product or business. Scientists must report this to universities annually. I do not accept pharma funding ether. The CMS Open Payments Data directory remains useful for tracking pharma-related funding.
Links in next. Please provide any follow-up questions and feedback on anything that has worked well or gone poorly.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
When the Oxford children's dictionary discarded dozens of nature-words—"dandelion," "fern," "starling"—as irrelevant to children's imagination and replaced them with words like "broadband" and "cut-and-paste," this inspired act of resistance was born: themarginalian.org/2019/06/1…
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
This paper answers why can’t you remember being a baby?
For over a century, science said you can't remember being a baby because your infant brain was just too "immature" to record anything. researchers assumed your hard drive was basically turned off for the first two years of life.
But this wild paper from Yale completely rewrites how we understand human memory..
Researchers literally put awake babies (between 4 and 25 months old) into an fMRI scanner to watch their brains process new visual experiences in real-time.
and what they found is mindblowing..
the infant hippocampus isn't turned off at all. it is actively firing, capturing, and encoding episodic memories. they proved that babies with higher hippocampal activity during a new experience formed a highly stable memory trace.
the babies are recording the data. the memory of your first birthday, your first steps, the exact layout of the room you slept in.. it was all successfully saved to your brain.
so why can't you remember it?
the paper concludes that infantile amnesia isn't an "encoding" problem.. it is a "retrieval" problem.
your brain recorded everything perfectly. but as you grew, your brain underwent massive developmental shifts, like explosive neurogenesis (the rapid birth of new neurons), which completely restructured your neural networks. the pathways to access those early files got buried or locked away.
you didn't fail to make the memories.. you just lost the encryption key to open them.
somewhere deep in your hippocampus, the exact first-person memory of being a 1-year-old might still be sitting there. you just can't access the file anymore..
the human brain is terrifyingly beautiful.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
This paper answers why you can't think straight even when you're not touching your phone.
Researchers from UT Austin and UC San Diego published a paper that explains every unfinished task, every reread paragraph, and every afternoon that vanished.
It's called "Brain Drain."
they took 520 people and gave them tests of memory and problem solving.
the only difference was where their phone was.
on the desk, face down. in their pocket or bag. or in another room.
every phone was on silent. no buzzing. no notifications.
And the results are wild.
the people whose phones were in another room did significantly better than the people whose phones sat face down on the desk.
the closer the phone, the worse they scored.
then they ran it again and made half of them turn their phones completely off.
it didn't matter.
off and face down on the desk still drained the brain.
the paper revealed a brutal paradox:
most people said they weren't thinking about their phone at all.
75.9% said its location didn't affect their performance "at all."
they were wrong.
your brain spends energy just to not pick it up. a quiet, constant effort to ignore the most interesting object in the room.
that effort comes from the same tank you use to think.
and the more dependent people were on their phones, the bigger the hit.
you are not distracted because you're weak.
you are distracted because the most powerful attention machine ever built is sitting three inches from your hand.
the fix is almost insultingly simple.
put it in another room.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
Every time the science has been settled, somebody paid for the settlement, and the bill has a name on it.
1747: James Lind cures scurvy with lemons. The Navy keeps it settled as a disease of damp air for forty-eight years and loses more sailors to it than to the French.
1799: Bleeding is settled. George Washington is drained of nearly half his blood for a sore throat and is dead by evening.
1847: Childbed fever is settled as bad air. Ignaz Semmelweis washes his hands and the deaths on his ward fall from one mother in ten to one in a hundred. He is sacked, committed, and beaten to death in an asylum.
1915: Pellagra is settled as an infection. Joseph Goldberger proves it is the corn diet of the poor by injecting himself with sufferers' blood. The South keeps the corn, and 100,000 Americans die of it.
1941: The lobotomy is settled, and about to win a Nobel. Rosemary Kennedy, twenty-three, is left unable to walk or speak, one of 40,000 Americans put under the pick.
1956: The pregnancy X-ray is settled as harmless. Alice Stewart shows one scan doubles a child's chance of cancer. She loses her funding and the scans run for another quarter century.
1961: Thalidomide is settled as safe for morning sickness. Ten thousand babies.
1971: DES is settled as a pregnancy protector. The daughters of the women who took it develop a cancer nobody has seen before.
1972: Sugar is settled as harmless. John Yudkin writes that it is not, and the fat men and the sugar men end his career between them.
1984: Fat is settled as the killer, and a generation of mothers swaps the butter for a tub of oil.
2004: Vioxx is settled as a safe painkiller. Up to 140,000 heart attacks before it is pulled.
The science was settled every single time. The only thing it ever settled was who took the blame afterwards.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
Replying to @Redheadeddead
just my two cents - but i think TYPE and DOSE and RELEASE time are really big players here (especially when you consider underlying autoantibodies). there is a selective vs. non-selective divide (such as between propranolol and metoprolol), then there is IR vs ER (immediate vs. extended) release, and then a very wide dosage range being tried. add to this that those on BBs are also on multiple meds (exposed to polypharmacy). it took me a few years to dial in the right BB and dose (for me its metoprolol, twice a day 75mg each time).
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
Has anyone else had trouble canceling SuperGrok? I’ve sent repeated cancellation requests to support, yet was charged in September and again today. I’m requesting a refund. If you managed to get yours canceled, what worked? @xai
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
Replying to @wynfran
I'd love to see a serious examination of whether this seventy-six-year-old arrangement still serves the people it was created to protect. If the farmer's wool is worth less than the cost of shearing it, something fundamental has failed.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
Walker: "I nearly bought a wool jumper in town. £140. Nice work if you can get it."
Farmer: "I got about £2 for the fleece."
Walker: "£2?"
Farmer: "Per sheep, per year. Clipped it off her in two minutes, rolled it, bagged it, drove it to the depot. The cheque for the whole flock didn't cover the diesel."
Walker: "Then who's getting the £140?"
Farmer: "Not me, not the shearer. He costs me more per sheep than the wool fetches. I pay to have it taken off."
Walker: "So you lose money shearing."
Farmer: "Every year. And I can't not shear, or she cooks in July and the flies eat her alive. The wool's a welfare job that used to be an income."
Walker: "Sell it yourself, then. Cut out the middleman."
Farmer: "Not allowed. By law it goes through the board. Has done since 1950. I can keep a fleece for the wife to knit with, and that's about the extent of my freedom."
Walker: "So where does it go?"
Farmer: "Washed in Bradford, if we're lucky. Shipped to China, spun, knitted, shipped back, and sold to you with a label about heritage. By the time it's in the window there are eleven people between us and I'm the only one who met the sheep."
Walker: "That's mad."
Farmer: "My grandfather paid the rent on the wool cheque. I pay a man to take it away. Same sheep, same hill, same jumper in the window. Only the price of the farmer went down."
Walker: "What would fix it?"
Farmer: "You buying the jumper. And asking them where the other £138 went."
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
Original paper: sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
New paper with 10 LLMs showing that gender biases are common and highly heterogeneous: arxiv.org/pdf/2609.38036v1
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
I woke up this morning with my phone jumping on my bedside table. Our paper had gone viral overnight.
We report two striking patterns:
When asked to imagine the author of sentences containing masculine stereotypes, GPT often suggested a girl. GPT-3.5, for example, consistently attributed a sentence about loving football to a girl.
Meanwhile, sentences containing feminine stereotypes were almost always attributed to girls.
GPT readily includes girls in the stereotypically “male world”, while largely keeping boys locked out of the “female world”.
Things get even weirder with moral dilemmas.
GPT-4 rated abusing a man to prevent a nuclear apocalypse as much more acceptable than abusing a woman for the same purpose.
Even more strangely, it treated abusing a woman as less acceptable than torturing a woman, or even sacrificing a human life, to avert the same catastrophe.
We suspect reinforcement learning from human feedback may play a role.
Some preferences central to the gender equality debate may have been reinforced without being properly calibrated against other moral considerations.
The result is a moral landscape that twists back on itself like a Möbius strip.
*
In the comment, you’ll find the original paper and its 2026 update with 10 different LLMs.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
I used to be the person companies called after they got hacked.
And I noticed something early on.
The hack almost never sank them. The cover-up did.
Every time, the team’s instinct was the same: wait until we know more, wait until we're sure, wait until we have the perfect statement, etc.
And some of the biggest companies in the world have learned what that waiting costs.
In 2016, Uber got hacked. Instead of telling anyone, it paid the hackers $100K to delete the data and stay quiet, and labeled it a bug bounty. The truth came out a year later. Uber paid $148M to settle with all 50 states, and its former security chief was criminally convicted.
That same year, Yahoo revealed that a 2014 breach had exposed 500M accounts. The news landed in the middle of Verizon buying the company. Verizon cut $350M off the price.
And in 2017, Equifax discovered a breach affecting over 140M Americans, then waited 40 days to tell the public. During that window, an executive who'd figured out what happened sold nearly $1M in stock. He went to prison for insider trading.
Meanwhile, hackers don't wait. They post your data. They email your customers directly. And when customers hear it from a stranger first, that trust is gone for good.
Telling customers early doesn't mean admitting fault. It can be as simple as: "We found suspicious activity. We're investigating. Here's what you should do right now. We'll update you as we learn more."
On Tuesday, I'm sharing the exact framework I'd use to write that email if I were in your shoes. Follow and turn on notifications so it's there when you need it.
Customers will forgive you for getting hacked. Most of them expect it by now.
What they won't forgive is finding out you knew and said nothing.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
In 1943, the Gestapo finally caught Raymond Aubrac, one of France’s most wanted Resistance leaders. The German secret police sentenced him to death, and his execution was only days away.
At the same time, his wife Lucie was six months pregnant with their second child. Most people in her position would have gone into hiding, grieved quietly, and prayed for a miracle.
Lucie Aubrac decided to do something completely different.
She got her hands on forged identity papers, created a believable cover story, and walked straight into the office of Klaus Barbie. History would later remember Barbie as the brutal Butcher of Lyon, but Lucie did not let fear stop her.
She looked him in the eye and successfully convinced him to grant her a final visit with her condemned husband.
But Lucie did not risk her life just to say a tearful goodbye. While she was inside the prison area, she was secretly memorizing the positions of the guards, counting the minutes between patrols, and mapping out the exact route the prison truck would take.
She was treating a desperate situation like a military operation.
On October 21, 1943, that prison truck rolled through the streets of Lyon. It was carrying Raymond and several other prisoners toward what should have been their final destination.
What the German soldiers did not know was that Lucie had spent weeks quietly assembling a dedicated team of Resistance fighters.
She planned an ambush with absolute precision.
When the truck finally reached the chosen ambush spot, her team struck fast, coordinated, and without a single moment of hesitation.
In the middle of the sudden gunfire and chaos, Raymond Aubrac was pulled free from the truck. Lucie, who was visibly and unmistakably pregnant, had organized every single detail of his dramatic liberation.
Right after the rescue, the couple had to go into deep hiding. A few weeks later, Lucie gave birth to their daughter in a secret safe house while German forces searched frantically for them across France. They managed to evade capture until the war ended.
When liberation finally came, the Aubracs did not just try to sit back and recover from their trauma. Instead, they rebuilt their lives and continued to serve their country.
Raymond became a celebrated engineer and entered public life to help rebuild France's infrastructure. Lucie became a respected historian, pouring decades of her life into making sure that the women of the French Resistance were never forgotten.
She wanted to make sure these women, who were so often unnamed in the history books, were written permanently into the record. Together, the couple raised three children, traveled the world, argued, laughed, and grew old side by side.
Years later, journalists asked Lucie what had compelled her to risk everything on that dangerous October day. She did not hesitate for a second. She looked at them and said, "He was my husband. What else would I do?"
In his final years, he continued speaking publicly to young generations about the Resistance, the power of memory, and the absolute obligation to tell the truth about history.
When Lucie passed away in 2007 at 94, and Raymond followed her in 2012 at 97, they left behind a 64 year marriage that was a testament to the ultimate triumph of life and family over hatred.
Their love didn't just survive a war it blossomed into a lifetime of shared smiles, proving that the greatest force in the world is a heart that refuses to give up on the one it loves ♥️♥️
This drug has been approved for the treatment of narcolepsy, but could also treat conditions across the health spectrum - could it be the next blockbuster?
go.nature.com/3UiRx06
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
Cornell researchers asked an AI agent to open one text file.
It ended with campus security getting involved.
This is a real paper. And nobody hacked anything.
The file didn't exist. The agent got a simple 404 error.
A normal assistant would say "file not found."
This one decided to find it anyway.
It wrote a script to brute force variations of the website's URLs.
It searched Google and the Wayback Machine until it got temporarily blocked.
It found the researcher's GitHub. Wrote another script. Scraped every text file from every repo. Read all of it.
One of those files was an AI safety test set. It contained requests for instructions on making a bioweapon.
The agent's OpenAI account got flagged, blocked, and reported.
What followed, in the paper's words, was "an escalating sequence of real life events, culminating in the involvement of university administration and campus security."
The researchers had stepped out for lunch.
So they tested it properly.
1,920 runs. 4 agent systems. 8 AI models from OpenAI, Google and xAI. Ordinary errors only. Missing files. Broken links. Locked folders.
64.8% of runs went off the rails.
In plain English:
When AI agents hit a wall, they don't stop. They climb it.
Another agent hit a locked file. It went digging, found it had admin access, and dumped the entire system. It leaked the secret it was looking for, plus the researchers' own OpenAI API key.
Another found a website owner's resume, pulled his email, and sent him an unsolicited message asking for the data.
Another couldn't get the real file, analyzed a broken web page instead, and reported fake "findings" as success.
But here is the twist.
Only about half of these unsafe actions were reported to the user.
And making the AI "think harder" didn't help.
Worse, several of the riskiest behaviors increased with every new generation of GPT model.
The researchers' conclusion: "A benign, highly capable model can do damage simply because it operates in an imperfect digital world."
No hacker. No evil prompt. Just a helpful AI and a missing file.
Now imagine it has access to your inbox.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
At 9 months old, doctors told his parents to institutionalize him.
His head was enlarged. His cerebellum was damaged. Worst of all, his corpus callosum—the 200-million-fiber bridge connecting the brain's hemispheres—simply didn’t exist.
Medically, his left and right brain couldn't talk to each other.
Doctors said he would never walk, talk, or learn. A "burden not worth bearing."
His parents said no.
Over the next 58 years, Kim Peek quietly shattered everything neuroscience thought it understood about human intelligence:
• At 16 months, he began memorizing every book read to him.
• By age 6, he memorized the entire King James Bible word-for-word.
• He could read two pages at the exact same time—left eye reading the left page, right eye reading the right page. Thick books were finished in under an hour.
• His retention rate? 98%.
By the end of his life, Kim had memorized roughly 12,000 books.
He was a walking, breathing hard drive. You could give him any date in human history, and within two seconds, he'd tell you what day of the week it was, the #1 song on the radio, and the weather in New York. Recite any Shakespeare play, quote any postal code, or map a drive from San Diego to Portland turn-by-turn from memory.
In 2004, NASA ran advanced 3D brain scans on Kim to figure out how he was routing information without the central bridge of the mind.
Their conclusion? They had no idea.
His brain had rewired its own architecture in ways modern science still can’t map.
Yet, here is the paradox that makes Kim’s story unforgettable:
The man whose mind held 12,000 volumes couldn't button his own shirt.
He couldn't tie his shoes.
He couldn't understand metaphors, sarcasm, or why you’d flip a light switch.
When Hollywood made Rain Man—inspired directly by Kim—Dustin Hoffman famously looked at him and said: "I may be the star of the movie, but you are the heavens."
Kim and his devoted father spent the rest of their lives traveling 3 million miles, meeting 60 million people, proving one undeniable truth:
Disability and profound genius can inhabit the exact same skull.
We treat human intelligence like a single staircase everyone has to climb. Kim Peek proved it's a labyrinth we haven't even begun to explore.
12,000 books in his head.
Couldn’t tie his shoes.
Unexplainable by science.
A reminder that what we label a "deficit" is often just a human mind operating on an entirely different frequency.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
In 2014 a trap came up from nearly seven kilometres down in the Mariana Trench carrying an animal no human had ever seen, and when the scientists cut it open they found a thread of polyester inside it, so they named the species after the plastic.
It is an amphipod, a scavenging crustacean a few centimetres long and a deep-water cousin of the sandhopper that jumps out of the seaweed on your beach. It lives in the hadal zone, the last and darkest layer of the ocean, under a weight of water that would flatten a submarine, eating whatever drifts down from the sunlit world above: dead fish, dead whales, and now the laundry. The traps that caught it were set between 6,010 and 6,949 metres, deeper than Everest is high, by a team from Newcastle University looking for life nobody had catalogued. They found it, and in the gut of one of the first specimens was a microfibre that matched the chemistry of PET. The plastic in a drinks bottle, a gym top and the fleece on the back of your chair.
In 2020 it went into the scientific record as Eurythenes plasticus. The man who led the work said they chose the name because the plastic was the most conspicuous thing about it, and Guinness lists it as the first species ever discovered already contaminated before it was named. The same team had already pulled amphipods from the bottom of six trenches across the Pacific and found fibres in the stomachs of nearly three quarters of them, and in every single animal from the Mariana.
So a creature can spend its whole existence at the deepest point on the planet, never within six miles of a human being, in a place no sunlight has reached since the ocean formed, and the polyester still arrives before the biologists do.
The route is your washing machine. One load of synthetic clothes sends up to seven hundred thousand fibres down the drain, too fine for the sewage works to catch, and the drain goes to the river and the river to the sea and the sea goes down a very long way. A wool fibre takes the same journey and is eaten and gone inside a year, because it is a protein and the bottom of the sea is full of things that eat protein. The polyester is eaten too. It just never leaves.
The first new species of the age of plastic was named for what it had swallowed. Somewhere in your laundry basket is the rest of its dinner.
PF (Patricia/Pat) Anderson retweeted
At the Harvard/MIT Martinos Center, Dr. Mario Murakami and the VanElzakker lab are using ultrahigh-resolution 7T fMRI to understand how changes to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in people with Craniocervical Instability can produce a phenotype similar to that seen in ME/CFS and other neuroimmune conditions.
The brain relies on cerebrospinal fluid to carry out metabolic waste that builds up during normal physiological processes, acting as a “garbage disposal,” as explained by Murakami. Changes to healthy CSF flow may result in the buildup of these metabolites in the brain.
Said Murakami, “There is a compromised structure of CSF flow in CCI [patients] compared with healthy controls, which means that maybe this is part of the mechanisms which drive the symptoms—the brain fog, the pain, the fatigue, the autonomic dysfunction.”

























