Here, Weinstein is effectively saying guns don’t kill people, people kill people.
Unfortunately, guns, as a fairly effective method of killing people, allow people who want to kill people to kill more people quickly. If there was an effective way to rid the country of all guns by banning them, it would be a good idea, but there isn’t (criminals will still have them), so it isn’t a good idea.
We can scrap the H-1B visa program, however, and we can ban migrants from India from the country. We can disarm employers who seek to injure the American worker by importing foreign labor on the cheap.
Replying to @TheOriginalWynn
Tell me: who has fought that importation longer? More publicly?
You or me?
With all due respect: those taking your jobs were not the Indians. They were the American employers. The Indians were the tool.
Vivek says America’s founding fathers sacrificed their honor before their lives. Little slips like this tell you a lot about a person. He’s always comparing himself to America’s founding fathers because that is how he would behave in their shoes (if he actually wore any).
America’s founding fathers risked their lives for their honor, not their honor for their lives. Their way of life is totally foreign to someone like Ramaswamy, who will do and say literally anything to get ahead.
It is important to realize that a large number of Republican lawmakers still see Trump as a bad dream from which the ‘Party of Reagan’ will soon wake up, even if they aren’t always forthcoming about this.
They want to take us back to the ‘respectable’ Republican politics of Bush, McCain, and Mitt Romney, which is for them, the rerum naturae and not just the status quo ante.
Young right-wingers have hardly known any other political landscape other than that dominated by Trump and are unable to see it for the exception that it is.
Trump’s coalition will not stay with the GOP “once we go back to traditional Republican platform priorities,” Thom Tillis told our @jmart.
Listen to his full interview: politi.co/4ib1c0L
There is something great and profound about Western man that should cause him to hesitate before mocking victims for their misfortune and recoil at those that would. This tendency is sometimes (errantly) given the title of “slave morality.”
It isn’t just about winning the elections are being seen in public as a “victor” who brings repute to one’s family instead of a “victim” who brings embarrassment, but winning in the right way. Status is not the most important thing; there is a moral world behind appearance, behind etiquette and naked ambition.
Western man feels as if he can lose before men and nonetheless win before God and that the approval of the latter is always worth more than that of the former.
This is something like grace and magnanimity, but it is not just the desire to distinguish oneself from the crude and insecure rival and plebeian that accounts for it. It is borne of a deep compassion and humanism, a private conscience, that European man already had, at least in part, before his conversion to Christianity. The Stoics believed in an “inner citadel” of the soul free from the court of public opinion. Socrates went to his grave and was executed by the Athenian state at the advice of his Daemonion.
There has always been an interiority to Occidental man that distinguishes him from Oriental man; it is the difference between shame and guilt that divides East from West.
The most vital types are, unfortunately, those foreign hordes of barbarians who would seek to lay waste to the West and build nothing better in its place.
phillip retweeted
“Indeed, we have already become too weary to die; now we continue to wake and we live on—in burial chambers!”
Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra
The distinction between man and the animal for Nietzsche is that the animal, guileless and red in beak and claw, has yet to convince itself that it is not a creature of instinct. It is man who thinks himself a free actor who draws from the supra-sensuous reservoirs of good, evil, strength, and weakness, in realizing or failing to realize his instincts.
Put more precisely, man does not even perform his impulses, it is his impulses that, in conjunction with his capacities, perform him, and persuade him that they are not mere impulses at all, but decisions decided out of indifference which only later ossify into habit; habits which he is morally responsible for.
Accusing your grandad of rape for hugging you without first asking for consent.
Isn’t it just a normal thing that your aunt pinches your cheeks unprompted at Thanksgiving and your grandparents smother you before you’ve even said hello. This used to be called affection.
He really is the anti-wifeguy.
Trump: Melania, you know, she's got this movie. I think it's like the number one movie of the year. Since then, she's been impossible to live with. She has a number one movie. Women are seeing it 5 or 6 times, right?
But she said to me, "Darling. Please don't dance. You're the President of the United States. It's not presidential." And you know, it's a funny thing because—oh I can't forget, where are the ladies from North Carolina? Where are you? They followed me all over the world. They're beautifully coiffed. They're beautiful women. I love them.
But she said to me, "You're the President of the United States, you're not supposed to be dancing off the stage to the gay national anthem." The only thing she hates more than dancing is when I do the weightlifter.
phillip retweeted
Scruton’s ruling out of an after life on the basis of a Kantian account of causality was more Kantian than Kant, who of course didn’t rule it out on that basis.
Pointing left every time one is confronted with a sound criticism of a Republican candidate or lawmaker nullifies any possible evaluative standard we could use to hold Republican politicians accountable for their actions, and, more importantly, move them towards that which we consider positively desirable and necessary (for its own sake).
The response to genuine criticism of any and all Republican candidates cannot just be “but the Democratic alternative is worse.”
JD Vance was in lockstep with Vivek this entire election cycle, from loaning him his political team in January of last year to sharing a stage with him and endorsing him in Ohio in August of this year. Now Vance is “disgusted” with his fellow Republicans for being justifiably critical of Ramaswamy’s appalling behavior.
VP Vance declined to take a stance on Vivek’s vicious ad campaign against Amy Acton, pivoting to the Democrats: “Well, I'll be honest with you. Whether the ad was appropriate or not is not really my concern. My concern is who is gonna govern. I have to admit I'm a little bit disgusted when I see Republicans who are whining more about that ad than they are about what the Democrats want to do.”
Follow: @AFpost






















