Paul Lee (@pjvlee) header
Paul Lee (@pjvlee) profile picture
London, England
Joined October 2008
Photo by Paul Lee (@pjvlee)Photo by Paul Lee (@pjvlee)Photo by Paul Lee (@pjvlee)Photo by Paul Lee (@pjvlee)Photo by Paul Lee (@pjvlee)Photo by Paul Lee (@pjvlee)Photo by Paul Lee (@pjvlee)Photo by Paul Lee (@pjvlee)Photo by Paul Lee (@pjvlee)Photo by Paul Lee (@pjvlee)
Paul Lee retweeted
My guess is most people aren’t aware of this so it’s good to see it reported in the FT. House builders are seeing their margins fall despite increases in revenues. The reason? Build costs are up. A lot. That’s partly because of general inflationary pressures but also partly because of the growing cost of planning policy and regulations. The consequence is that fewer development sites are viable and fewer homes will be built.
28
114
10
505
79,160
One of the first things Burnham must do ad PM is tackle online misinformation. It’s destroying our democracy.
Misinformation about Andy Burnham's wife is now the most viral political story in the UK. How does a rumour that started in a local Facebook group in January 2022 become national misinformation? Here's the anatomy of an online rumour.
271
172
13
1,054
44,166
Paul Lee retweeted
Now imagine they were brown - right wing politicians making emergency statements and riots on our streets. Why is there not much with this I wonder?
13 men who allegedly helped a rapist drug and abuse his wife have been named They include a paramedic and a former chief executive of a lower league football club bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cnv9…
31
148
2
669
44,676
Paul Lee retweeted
This molecular oncologist with 2,400 followers is debating a standup comedian with 720,000+ followers about whether sunscreen causes cancer. Populism is not just a political phenomenon. It also influences which information gets disseminated widely, based on speaker popularity. But, as we’ve seen in recent history, the most popular sources of information aren’t always the most knowledgable.
Replying to @jimmy_dore
There is no evidence sunscreen causes cancer. None. The link between unprotected sun exposure and skin cancer, all types, is one of the most well-established findings in oncology. On the contrary: One of the largest randomized trials ever done on this found zero harmful effect from daily sunscreen use, and a real reduction in squamous cell carcinoma. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1047… Don't spread nonsense.
80
216
15
1,238
189,556
10 years of scam adverts. I have the misfortune to be in 44% of them according to the police. I've sued. I've lobbied. I've cried at hideous cases of vulnerable people losing everything. Why has nothing been done. Please watch...
Must watch: Martin Lewis lets loose on politicians over 10yrs inaction over scam ads. Courtesy: @thismorning
40
332
5
1,124
186,620
Well known journalist on Times Radio just now saying the polls in Makerfield are too small to be meaningful and unless someone paid for a 10 (Ten!) THOUSAND! sample they couldn’t say much. Then launched into some anecdotal comments about what he’s hearing in the doors and confirming that those trends were *real*
12
17
3
123
55,207
I find it interesting how the degradation of good manners is so often centred around phone use. We talk about protecting kids from smart phones but most adults frankly can’t handle them either. Whether it’s filming strangers without consent (my absolute bugbear) or being anti-socially loud - these machines have messed with our brains & we need to talk about it.
Replying to @SangitaMyska
🧵4. This isn’t just a London problem. It’s NOT a race issue. We are experiencing an entitlement epidemic. It’s happening everywhere in the UK. Re-installing good manners in shared spaces has to be a joint effort: parents, media caregivers, schools, citizens, @MayorofLondon & @TfL . Everyone.
18
37
1
343
38,316
BBC News leading with a cancelled concert. Second on news list: US president threatens civilisational erasure
248
4,008
111
19,736
416,989
Paul Lee retweeted
For decades, urban planners have rigorously tracked every car in New York City while completely ignoring the pedestrians. An MIT research group has finally built the first complete model of foot traffic in an American city. They took baseline counts from the Department of Transportation and mapped a routable dataset covering every pavement, crosswalk, and footpath across the five boroughs. The resulting data exposes massive flaws in how cities allocate infrastructure funding. Midtown Manhattan hits nearly 1,700 pedestrians per block per hour during peak times. Because officials see these massive raw numbers, they funnel the bulk of pedestrian safety investments directly into the city centre. The MIT model proves this bias is a mistake. Neighbourhoods in Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx routinely register hundreds of pedestrians per block per hour. People in these outer boroughs are walking in huge numbers, but they don't get the infrastructure to match. The model also rewrites the maths on urban safety. Governments typically rank dangerous intersections by tallying up total crashes. High-traffic areas like Herald Square or Times Square rack up lots of accidents. Planners look at those totals and assume the area is highly dangerous for walkers. The new system calculates risk on a per-pedestrian basis instead. When you divide the accidents by the millions of people walking through Midtown, the individual risk is actually very low. The true danger zones are around highway off-ramps and heavy car infrastructure in low-density areas like Staten Island. A pedestrian walking there faces a drastically higher statistical chance of being hit by a vehicle. This framework changes how urban development works. Los Angeles is already applying the model to prepare its public transit and mobility networks for the 2028 Olympics. The state of Maine is using it to evaluate 140 different towns to identify necessary safety upgrades. Planners finally have the hard data to prove what walkers have known for years. We spent the entire twentieth century designing our environment around the automobile. We finally have the tools to start building cities for people. Link to paper: nature.com/articles/s44284-0…
25
239
29
1,937
460,635
Paul Lee retweeted
As a priest, who has celebrated Holy Communion twice today and is departing for a Cistercian monastery tomorrow, can I just say that this 'Easter Egg rage' is nonsense. If you care that much, get yourself to church, and then perhaps you will realise that our faith is not based on confectionary or its packaging.
296
1,092
99
6,010
209,192
Paul Lee retweeted
Same is true for newspapers etc Rishi Sunak joined Anthropic and Microsoft last October. A few weeks later he became a Times columnist. He’s since written several times for the paper on AI and related issues — no mention at all of his paid interest
TV news should have to flag if a guest is a paid lobbyist One reason lobbying firms like to employ ex-politicians & spads is they get invited on TV as relevant experts to talk about political issues, but viewers are rarely if ever informed that they are paid advocates for companies, industries or even other countries
20
539
8
1,621
63,525
I had pretty much lost faith in the UK government’s ability to regulate AI fairly, after they proposed handing creatives’ work to AI companies for free. But there are new ministers working on tech & AI, and their response to the Grok debacle has been superb. Increasingly hopeful that it is a sign these new ministers will be less subservient to US big tech, and will actually stand up for the British people.
“No woman or child should live in fear of having their image sexually manipulated by technology” Secretary of State @leicesterliz updates on the government’s response to non-consensual sexual deepfakes on social media 🔽
32
107
4
1,860
115,777
For the people asking if the Apple Google deal means there is no differentiation, think about it in F1 terms: multiple teams run the same engine, yet deliver vastly different results based on design and setup. Same here
9
12
3
192
16,323
Lowest London murder rate in a decade, after significant decline. taking into account population, since records like this began in 2003 At 1.1 in 100k one of the safest major cities in the globe, safer than all big American cities, & every single US State bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy8…
1,132
1,888
253
8,307
1,787,742
Paul Lee retweeted
Many Teslabros commenting on this saying buttons are unsafe etc. Get a grip, please. As someone who has worked for a few years in automotive ergonomics, here’s the science of why physical buttons are better: The human body remembers where things are and relates them to touch. When you walk into a dark room in your house, you don’t look for the light switch do you? You know where it is and reach for it, then confirm the place with the touch of your fingers, your brain registering the shape of the switch. That’s ’muscle memory’. You absolutely, 100% cannot do that with a touchscreen. You might be able to get to the general location but then you need to look, taking your eyes off the road. Especially for that second press as there’s no way they’re just one menu deep. So to summarise, touchscreens are not safer. What they are, is much much cheaper, which is why manufacturers like them. The people who buy the cars though, on the whole, do not.
VW reveals the new ID.Polo interior and hallelujah it looks like they’ve finally listened! No stupid slider bar under the screen - actual buttons for the AC. FOUR windows switches instead of the shite we have on the ID3/Born Actual buttons on the steering wheel. 👍👍👍
399
966
64
11,612
431,354
London is a brilliant and on all key metrics a safe city ( except do protect your mobile phone) Trump, Musk etc are pernicious and wrong.Don’t believe the fake gloom about London via @FT giftarticle.ft.com/giftartic…
569
295
43
1,611
104,564
This morning @DailyMail admits that it published a statement it claimed I had made when I have never said anything like it. 🤔
810
892
190
3,439
1,165,070
If you're a public service broadcaster, you absolutely should not leave the answer to a question like this hanging in the tweet.
63
1,065
9
13,412
387,786
I am not a Labour voter but what Trump says about Sadiq Khan is rubbish. He keeps pushing the line that London is broken and that Khan is to blame. I live here. I do not just stick to the west of the city where I live, I move around and see it as a whole. London is alive, busy, and brilliant. It is nothing like the picture painted by Trump or the right. Trump is not confused, he knows what he is doing. He plays up division because it suits him. The truth is that London’s strength comes from the mix of people who call it home. Different cultures, faiths, beliefs and backgrounds all live side by side. That is what makes the city powerful and wonderful, and why I think it is the best city in the world. And whilst I do not vote for Sadiq in London, I believe he is a decent man, a man of principle, and that counts for far more than the sneering right who shout down any good he does for their own political gain.
2,428
1,848
192
14,200
1,092,016