Pnemonic Z.

Solana vs Starknet controversy debunked. We called it early: the current meta is for brands to be more interactive and personal to generate buzz pre-announcements. Today, cat's out of the bag with the Starknet, Solana and Near partnership. Thing is... If you only react, you’re already late. If you can identify narratives, you’re still early. This is what we do on our show every Tue & Thu, 9pm HKT. Tracking narratives early, before they become headlines.

This is why most AI agents won’t scale. AI agents are smart, but most of them are stuck. They live on one chain, raise capital on one chain, and only interact inside that bubble. That’s a real bottleneck once things scale. That’s the problem @useTria is going after. Tria separates AI logic from chain complexity. Agents don’t need to “learn” Ethereum, Solana, Move, Cosmos, etc. They just express intent and Tria routes, executes, and settles across chains. Under the hood, it’s things like: – BestPath AVS finding the most efficient cross-chain routes – AI agents competing to execute intents better and cheaper – Non-custodial wallets with strict permissions so devs don’t control funds Agents can finally move liquidity, optimize yield, arbitrate, and manage treasuries across chains without hacks or manual glue. This is the kind of infra AI agents actually need if they’re going to do real things Curious to see where Tria takes this next.