konrad (@praeterproptr) header
konrad (@praeterproptr) profile picture

rave against the dying of the light

Geneva
Joined June 2020
Photo by konrad (@praeterproptr)Photo by konrad (@praeterproptr)Photo by konrad (@praeterproptr)Photo by konrad (@praeterproptr)Photo by konrad (@praeterproptr)Photo by konrad (@praeterproptr)Photo by konrad (@praeterproptr)Photo by konrad (@praeterproptr)Photo by konrad (@praeterproptr)Photo by konrad (@praeterproptr)
It's so tragic that universal love is all you need and it's already right there but you also need to proactively defend against those who don't believe either of those claims to be true.
1
2
21
1,811
Replying to @BethMayBarnes
Similar to the point put beautifully here
I encourage those at frontier AI companies to read this quote, from Ellsberg to Kissinger back in 1968: “Henry, there’s something I would like to tell you, for what it’s worth, something I wish I had been told years ago. You’ve been a consultant for a long time, and you’ve dealt a great deal with top secret information. But you’re about to receive a whole slew of special clearances, maybe fifteen or twenty of them, that are higher than top secret." “I’ve had a number of these myself, and I’ve known other people who have just acquired them, and I have a pretty good sense of what the effects of receiving these clearances are on a person who didn’t previously know they even existed. And the effects of reading the information that they will make available to you." “First, you’ll be exhilarated by some of this new information, and by having it all — so much! incredible! — suddenly available to you. But second, almost as fast, you will feel like a fool for having studied, written, talked about these subjects, criticized and analyzed decisions made by presidents for years without having known of the existence of all this information, which presidents and others had and you didn’t, and which must have influenced their decisions in ways you couldn’t even guess. In particular, you’ll feel foolish for having literally rubbed shoulders for over a decade with some officials and consultants who did have access to all this information you didn’t know about and didn’t know they had, and you’ll be stunned that they kept that secret from you so well." “You will feel like a fool, and that will last for about two weeks. Then, after you’ve started reading all this daily intelligence input and become used to using what amounts to whole libraries of hidden information, which is much more closely held than mere top secret data, you will forget there ever was a time when you didn’t have it, and you’ll be aware only of the fact that you have it now and most others don’t….and that all those other people are fools." “Over a longer period of time — not too long, but a matter of two or three years — you’ll eventually become aware of the limitations of this information. There is a great deal that it doesn’t tell you, it’s often inaccurate, and it can lead you astray just as much as the New York Times can. But that takes a while to learn." “In the meantime it will have become very hard for you to learn from anybody who doesn’t have these clearances. Because you’ll be thinking as you listen to them: ‘What would this man be telling me if he knew what I know? Would he be giving me the same advice, or would it totally change his predictions and recommendations?’ And that mental exercise is so torturous that after a while you give it up and just stop listening. I’ve seen this with my superiors, my colleagues….and with myself." “You will deal with a person who doesn’t have those clearances only from the point of view of what you want him to believe and what impression you want him to go away with, since you’ll have to lie carefully to him about what you know. In effect, you will have to manipulate him. You’ll give up trying to assess what he has to say. The danger is, you’ll become something like a moron. You’ll become incapable of learning from most people in the world, no matter how much experience they may have in their particular areas that may be much greater than yours.” "….Kissinger hadn’t interrupted this long warning. As I’ve said, he could be a good listener, and he listened soberly. He seemed to understand that it was heartfelt, and he didn’t take it as patronizing, as I’d feared. But I knew it was too soon for him to appreciate fully what I was saying. He didn’t have the clearances yet."
1
11
610
Things that increase welfare vs GDP are rarely so neatly juxtapositioned. Thanks, Philip Morris International
1
1
146
Also, just lmao at that mission statement What even
24
Sometimes I spend hours thinking about politics and stewing in frustration over the cynicism everyone seems to blindly hold onto. The fundamental story of civilization is one where goodness and cooperation has repeatedly triumphed, and the present is no different.
3
2
51
2,412
By default, you should expect an AI-driven industrial expansion to concentrate in the US, just as the data center buildout has. Building fully automated factories requires the same things as data centers: lots of private land, easy permitting, and abundant energy. For the data center buildout, only a few regions in the US (e.g., West Texas) have been able to provide those things. I find this somewhat worrying, and it does raise the importance of getting SEZs in non-US democracies (though doing SEZs well is really hard).
5
2
20
1,007
The Euro -> US migration is accelerating! Great for Nora and OAIF, sad for UK and Europe. Switzerland is the only place in Europe for technical people with a chance of resisting this pull afaict (not accounting for policy stuff). Consider Zurich if you appreciate multipolarity.
After two wonderful and rewarding years at @ARIA_research, I’m excited to share that I am joining the @FoundationOAI as Program Director of Formal Methods.
1
6
357
konrad retweeted
There’s 100% a kind of mania you can get into with coding agents, where it feels like you’re getting a lot done and working all the time but nothing is really happening. I think it's often a form of avoidance of something else in life.
808
845
539
16,985
1,426,993
If just a few lab staff took on verification work full-time, verifying a US-China pacing deal could get much more feasible within months. Here are 8 specific things lab staff could start on today to help make international verification possible: 🧵
8
67
11
349
36,115
From an ex-Anthropic employee:
42
81
32
1,820
216,225
Yup - when Chiara and I were considering moving to the US, 2.5y ago, we concluded that we'd need at least 3x our income for the same quality of life as in Geneva (where we were pretty squarely in the median bracket).
This quoted post is unavailable.
2
6
402
Thanks for the response @ben_golub! Speaking for myself, I actually judge the output of the efforts mostly on if they engage with interesting and important questions, and engage with the magnitude of the change - which mostly means using assumptions which are not in the category "this is obviously not going to be true". As an added bonus, the questions can be decision relevant. As @alexolegimas wrote in a different response, and I agree with, I want and I'm happy to argue we need models which are structurally innovative (this is what I tried to gesture at with AI not being exactly like capital or labour so far, and not being a normal technology). Maybe it's easier to show using examples - here are some questions I currently think about 1. Should we speed up or slow down emergence of "automated bundles of capital and AI" (ie sovereign AI, AIs without principals)? What are the macro implications? 2. To what extent everything, including various good civilizational equilibria, works because of bounded rationality (where humans are within some not too wide range) and frictions? 3. What can we say about equilibria between agents with extremely different profiles of bounded rationality? 4. What are the elasticities and frictions around RSI? 5. How to protect the processes leading to formation of people's preferences? I would love to read or skim an "AGI-pilled" paper every few days engaging with any of these. Who is working on that? Also as a side-note - I don't want people to agree with me; actually don't know what agreeing with me on answers would mean - I don't know the answers, or have huge uncertainty about them. I would love people agreeing with me the questions are important and urgent. As far your answer is close to "You don't understand: the field of econ is structurally not oriented toward answering the most important econ questions now. Most people work and will work on modest, backward-looking empirics, or make modest change assumptions" my response is "Perhaps the field can and should raise to the occasion? Perhaps more people can jump sub-disciplines and work on forward-looking policy-relevant quetions? Who else should orient the field toward what's important rather than people inside?". Ultimately if almost all economists will stick to their sub-disciplines and "post-AGI as if nothing happens" assumptions justifiable to referees... who will answer the questions?
This misdiagnoses things in a few different ways - let me try to unpack. (1) A lot of the 10x new economists of AI are empirical. Truly empirical econ is modest and backward-looking. (2) What you want is new theory - that's where big new approaches will live/come from. 1/
3
8
2
72
7,559
We're a distributed species, and intergenerationally so. Parents gain capabilities from kids as the kids do from them. Trying to fix yourself is only worth it in context because you're serving a purpose in a super organism that is also serving you. God is this super organism.
Replying to @webdevMason
I can imagine a mind that is unhappy about having had children but it would have to be pretty different from mine "Gift from God" feels appropriate, the ways I was changed didn't seem realistically plausible until they happened
1
4
211
Consider that the people who were right about AI-enabled cyberattacks might be right about AI-enabled bioweapons
SITUATION DETECTED: CloudFlare CEO Matthew Prince says he is aware of additional severe vulnerabilities in other pieces of critical software, and said “I think we’re going to have a couple years where every single week it’s going to feel like the sky is falling,” per Reuters.
26
105
21
1,102
97,517
Was moved to tears thrice today, hearing about women's empowerment in Nigeria, reducing nuclear weapons stockpiles, and improving broiler chicken welfare. It's good not to be EA adjacent.
Can I give you 10% of me? By Opus 5.5🧡
8
197
I'm only 2 minutes in and there have already been like 5 gems
New blog post: integer tokenisation, the physics of John Stewart Bell, the Draghi report, Cormac McCarthy's dialogue, the final days of the Qing court, Art Deco in the British Isles, and other things I read or thought about in the last month
5
9
647
Same for his Paretotopia piece!
Too few people have really engaged with this masterpiece. Drexler was too early! owainevans.github.io/pdfs/Re…
5
211
Yooo how the hell have I been sleeping on Wispr Flow PSA if you're only talking to the agents and copy-pasting their output, you're not yappin enough
1
6
330
Keep getting asked this: why would I shill Geneva? Imho, how much you'll like Geneva will depend a lot on the life stage you're in. I love Geneva because it's sizable yet I can bike everywhere, well governed, and extremely cosmopolitan and diverse (in relative terms, the average is similar to new York, obvs much smaller in absolute numbers). It's imho the single best city in Europe from the perspective of starting an international family (i.e. choosing a home base for the next 20+y). That is assuming you're going to have a few kids and money isn't your biggest worry. From a social, economical, political, and environmental perspective, it is as safe as it gets. Housing stock is great, with a few months of patience to find exactly what you like. You're everywhere relevant in Europe within 2-3h, roughly equi-distant between Asia and America, and loads of great people come through regularly. The countryside is super close and beautiful. The educational and cultural offering, as well as the food, are more than good enough. It is a bad city if you're between 16 and 25yo or don't yet have something you're obsessed with or don't yet have someone you consider to be a life partner (because it's too small a dating pool). It is a bad city if you want to build something from nothing (because you need something to show for or connections). It is also a bad city if you live outside of the city center. It is bad if you move here not knowing anyone who's locally well connected on the matters of your interest.
Replying to @powerbottomdad1
You're very welcome to move to Switzerland. I'm happy to help.
1
2
20
643
We need more local microsociety experiments!
I talked to @chiaragerosa about the needs of the European AI talent landscape, the meaning of community-building, and local experimentation that is essential for growing the progress movement. I really enjoyed this conversation, and Chiara had so many good takes! Link below.
1
6
250