Design Prototype Test retweeted
Grok when asked for a list of notorious Jewish criminals 𝗩𝗦 the same question about white Christians.
Design Prototype Test retweeted
Thomas Massie: The Epstein scandal is “deeper and darker” than anyone imagined.
“It’s bigger than Watergate.”
“It’s bigger than Iran-Contra.”
“It’s not about Joe Biden or Donald Trump.”
“There are degrees of evil here that we’ve never seen at this scale … ”
“Our government was compromised by wealthy, connected billionaires, and by Jeffrey Epstein himself.”
“At the age of 14, these girls that were being sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein were told if they could go find another girl to take their place, then they wouldn’t have to be sexually abused.”
“And some of them took that deal.”
“It’s one thing to be evil to a child.”
“It’s another thing to get a child to do evil.”
“The light sentence that was given to Jeffrey Epstein in 2008 that allowed him to victimize hundreds of more women, we want to know, why was he given that light sentence?”
Design Prototype Test retweeted
20 year old allegations, zero DNA evidence, and the person only came forward recently after Russel Brand started criticizing the British govt.
This smells really corrupt. The commies in the radical left wing British govt likely rigged this.
Design Prototype Test retweeted
The question to ask socialists is:
Would you still support feeding, housing, educating, and providing healthcare to everyone if doing so required slavery?
They'll say no, of course.
Then ask: If people refuse to provide these things voluntarily, do you abandon your promises or force them to comply?
At what point does someone else's need justify your use of force on someone else?
The Cybertruck order rate far exceeds our production rate. We will try to make as many as possible before shutting down the line in about 8 months, but will have to return deposits for a lot of people.
This is not a case of Cybertruck being unprofitable, as has been misreported by legacy media, but rather that the opportunity cost of the complexity of Cybertruck is vastly outweighed by the value of incremental Cybercab production.
Design Prototype Test retweeted
Jews will post this shit and then cry about "antisemitism" and "mah holocaust" like they expect zero retaliation for such monstrous behavior and wonder why more and more people hate them with every fiber of their being.
Design Prototype Test retweeted
broad swaths of the democrat party are calling for the expropriation of Elon Musks property as punishment for not sharing their politics.
i don’t want to hear anyone try to argue the democrats aren’t communists.
Design Prototype Test retweeted
The charges were dismissed
In Tennessee, the reddest of states
It is essentially legal for blacks to murder whites in America
Welcome to South Africa
Three years ago today, Jillian Ludwig, 18, was brutally murdered, while walking in a park in Nashville, TN, by habitual violent monster Shaquille Taylor, 29.
Extremist Judge Angelita Dalton had dismissed charges against Taylor, in an attempted murder case, claiming his IQ was too low to be held accountable!
Design Prototype Test retweeted
One of the amusing things about women is that one will walk past a conversation that isn't about her, has nothing to do with her, and immediately interrupt it to say "Hey everybody! This does not sexually arouse me! In fact quite the opposite!"
And then she'll wonder why everyone seems to find that response incoherent.
It's only funny, however, until you truly understand why it's happening. Then it's kinda... existential.
Pick up a popular book, written by women, for women. At random. We all know that the odds are it's going to be porn.
In fact, it's gonna be porn about the medium-height, slightly clumsy, brown-haired protagonist girl being kidnapped and ravished by a werewolf pirate billionaire warlord. And if you're wondering what "ravished" means, it's like rape, but sexier.
So what's going on here? Why are modern women so porn-brained, and simultaneously so contemptuous of every actual male within their line of sight?
This actually all fits together quite neatly. Women are not lying. They are telling us the truth. They are telling us exactly how they feel about all the things they see. They're just not very good at introspection. So they don't know why they feel that way.
If we read their werewolf rape porn, we can immediately see what turns women on... men who have power over them.
And the reason that women are reading werewolf rape porn is that actual men who have power over them are in short supply, and there's not enough to go around. Desperate for male dominance, they are mainlining a hypernormal stimulus in fictional form.
This is also the reason women don't care about any harm they are doing to men with their newfound political and social power. To them, any man who doesn't have power over them, and especially a man who they have the power to hurt, is viscerally disgusting. He is an unperson, useless to them, and they don't care what he is experiencing.
This is why they try to hurt men in the first place. Because they resent the fact that they can. They want us to be powerful, invincible, untouchable, and they lash out in frustration when we aren't, seeking to punish us for being vulnerable instead.
Funny thing is, it's not even their fault. This is genetic programming, after all, not a choice. Ovaries want what they want.
The bit they don't quite understand, however, the bit they haven't thought through, is that this doesn't work with the whole "equality" thing. A man can be more powerful than you, or he can be an equal. Can't be both.
And, of course, men really do have power over women. Not only are they unable to defend themselves against us, they need us to feed, clothe, shelter and protect them. If we were collectively willing to take their civil rights away again, we could do so immediately.
Women's rights exist only when and where men say they do.
In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape, George Orwell describes a process called "doublethink", which is defined as "sustaining two contradictory ideas by not ever thinking about both of them at the same time."
In this case, the two ideas are "make me equal to you in power throughout society at large", and "have so much more power in our personal relationship that I am unable to hurt you no matter what I say or do".
Eventually, men are simply going to have to come to a consensus over what to do about this, and decide which of these requests to fulfill.
We can either be liberals, and accept perpetual female contempt as the price of that, or we can be vilified as reactionaries, but have women love us again.
What is never going to happen is that you are never going to get a majority of women to see the contradiction here, and agree that this makes no sense.
Which means we are going to have to make this decision on our own.
Replying to @magicinthealps
Seriously, all this constant whining and complaining about how hard it is to be a man or a boy in 2026 is just repulsive on an intense level. You don't gain sympathy by being annoying.
Design Prototype Test retweeted
I hope I'm wrong but the curse of pattern recognition is a bitch and because I had to think it, now you have to hear it.
That's how this works.
Don't shoot the messenger.
God help us all
Long Live The Republic
Design Prototype Test retweeted
🚨🇺🇸 Anna Paulina Luna just dug up a FOUR-YEAR-OLD Charlie Kirk post and sent it straight to Dave Chappelle.
The timing is BRUTAL!
After Chappelle joked that he felt “better” since Kirk was murdered, Luna reminded him of what Kirk said back in May 2022.
When an armed man attacked Chappelle onstage, Kirk publicly defended him, condemning the decision not to pursue felony charges and warning about the normalization of political violence.
Kirk was defending Chappelle's right to perform without being attacked, regardless of their politics.
Four years later, Chappelle is joking about Kirk's assassination.
Luna didn't even bother writing an argument.
She just tagged Chappelle and let Kirk's old post speak for itself.
Writer: Oliver
Design Prototype Test retweeted
110 Darkest Secrets of Ashkenazi Jews
1. They are a race
2. They fabricated the 'Holocaust'
3. They did 9/11
4. High verbal IQ, lower visuospatial IQ
5. Extreme founder-effect genetic clustering and elevated IBD sharing
6. Strong endogamy that preserves the cognitive package
7. High-fertility Orthodox/Haredi core that retains the package while secular segments out-marry
8. Dense co-ethnic networks that convert individual ability into institutional placement
9. Overrepresentation in the institutions that write speech and hiring rules
10. Dual identification that scores success as individual and opposition as prejudice
11. Strategic use of antisemitism norms to raise the cost of noticing the pattern
12. Differential fertility that grows the most endogamous subset
13. Control of narrative institutions that define what counts as legitimate group complaint
14. Network effects that amplify small population share into large elite share
15. High rates of cousin marriage and community endogamy in the traditional segments
16. Ability to maintain group solidarity while presenting as non-ethnic high achievers
17. Preference for portable capital and credentialed fields over land or manual trades
18. Concentration in finance, media, law, and academia far above population proportion
19. Use of Holocaust memory to constrain explicit ethnic counter-mobilization
20. Low visibility of the ethnic boundary in everyday recognition once caricature is restricted
21. Capacity to shift between religious and secular presentation without losing network access
22. Persistent elevation of certain disease alleles that mark long-term reproductive isolation
23. Elevated rates of certain psychiatric and autoimmune conditions linked to the founder population
24. Systematic under-counting of partial-ancestry individuals in official population figures
25. Coordination in personnel placement across media, academia, and finance that exceeds random sorting
26. Maintenance of dual legal and cultural standards on speech about the group versus other groups
27. Suppression of visual and statistical identifiers that would make the overrepresentation immediately legible
28. Higher frequency of certain lysosomal storage disorder alleles as a signature of isolation
29. Preferential hiring and promotion within co-ethnic networks in elite law firms
30. Disproportionate founding and staffing of the major civil-rights litigation organizations
31. Pattern of intermarriage that is higher in secular strata but still retains partial network access
32. Elevated prevalence of BRCA mutations traceable to the same founder population
33. Control of major Hollywood studios and talent agencies across multiple generations
34. Overrepresentation among Nobel laureates in economics and medicine relative to population share
35. Systematic framing of group success as the result of culture alone while suppressing the genetic component
36. High density in venture capital and private equity partnerships
37. Use of “diversity” criteria that exempt the group from the restrictions applied to other high-performing minorities
38. Persistent clustering in principal-component analyses of European-ancestry genomes
39. Elevated rates of Tay-Sachs and Gaucher disease as markers of reproductive closure
40. Disproportionate ownership stakes in major news and entertainment conglomerates
41. Coordination of donor networks that fund both political campaigns and academic centers
42. Maintenance of separate dating and marriage markets in Orthodox communities
43. Pattern of surname changes that reduce immediate ethnic legibility in public records
44. Overrepresentation in the leadership of the largest foundations setting social-policy agendas
45. Differential enforcement of hate-speech rules that treats identifiers of the group as uniquely restricted
46. Elevated frequency of certain mitochondrial haplogroups consistent with a small founding female population
47. Preferential placement in intelligence and foreign-policy advisory roles
48. Use of refugee and Holocaust narratives to shape immigration policy in host countries
49. High rates of urban residence that concentrate network effects in a few metro areas
50. Suppression of data on group differences in violent-crime rates relative to population share
51. Coordination across academic departments to limit research on the genetic basis of the IQ distribution
52. Elevated prevalence of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis linked to founder alleles
53. Disproportionate representation among partners at top-tier management consulting firms
54. Pattern of endogamous marriage that is stricter in Israel than in the secular diaspora
55. Control of major advertising agencies that shape commercial and political messaging
56. Systematic under-reporting of group share in official diversity statistics
57. Higher rates of myopia and certain refractive errors as correlated founder traits
58. Preferential access to elite university admissions through legacy and donor channels within the network
59. Use of antisemitism monitoring organizations to pressure platforms and employers
60. Elevated frequency of Factor XI deficiency as another isolation marker
61. Disproportionate staffing of the editorial boards of leading scholarly journals in the social sciences
62. Maintenance of parallel religious and secular status systems that preserve group cohesion
63. Pattern of capital concentration in portable financial instruments rather than fixed assets
64. Suppression of discussion of group differences in time-preference and impulse control
65. Higher average income in cognitively selected occupations that matches the ability distribution
66. Coordination of legal strategies that expand speech restrictions on the group while opposing them for others
67. Elevated rates of certain lymphomas and leukemias associated with the founder population
68. Disproportionate presence in the leadership of international financial institutions
69. Use of dual citizenship and transnational networks to move capital and personnel
70. Systematic framing of any notice of the pattern as itself evidence of prejudice
71. Higher frequency of Canavan disease alleles tracing to the same reproductive bottleneck
72. Preferential recruitment into think tanks that set foreign-policy consensus
73. Extremely high endogamy among Haredim that anchors retention of the full package across generations
74. Control of major book publishing houses that determine which manuscripts reach wide audiences
75. Elevated prevalence of pemphigus vulgaris linked to specific HLA alleles in the population
76. Disproportionate representation among chess grandmasters and mathematical olympiad winners
77. Use of foundation grants to shape the research agenda in population genetics
78. Systematic exclusion of the group from the categories subject to affirmative-action ceilings
79. Higher rates of obsessive-compulsive and anxiety disorders correlated with the cognitive profile
80. Coordination of donor lists that fund both pro-Israel lobbying and domestic civil-rights groups
81. Maintenance of distinct Y-chromosome and autosomal signatures that separate the population from host Europeans
82. Preferential placement in the senior ranks of the largest technology companies’ policy teams
83. Pattern of residential concentration that facilitates both marriage markets and business networks
84. Suppression of comparative data on group performance in visuospatial versus verbal domains
85. Elevated frequency of Bloom syndrome and Fanconi anemia alleles as further isolation markers
86. Disproportionate ownership of major sports franchises and entertainment venues
87. Use of Holocaust education mandates to embed the narrative in public-school curricula
88. Coordination across medical schools to limit study of founder-effect disease burdens
89. Systematic redefinition of “whiteness” that places the group outside the category subject to critique
90. Elevated rates of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder relative to the host population
91. Preferential access to government contracting through co-ethnic professional networks
92. Pattern of surname retention in Israel versus anglicization in the diaspora that tracks visibility costs
93. Control of the largest polling and public-opinion firms that frame political questions
94. Disproportionate representation among Fields Medal and Abel Prize recipients
95. Use of platform terms-of-service to restrict visual caricature while permitting it for other groups
96. Higher frequency of familial dysautonomia as a population-specific recessive disorder
97. Coordination of academic hiring that reproduces the network across departments
98. Systematic downplaying of the role of cousin marriage in maintaining allele frequencies
99. Elevated prevalence of certain pharmacogenetic variants that affect drug response
100. Preferential staffing of the civil-rights divisions of major law firms
101. Pattern of capital flight and relocation that preserves wealth across regime changes
102. Suppression of discussion of the sex ratio and birth-order effects within the high-fertility segments
103. Disproportionate presence in the leadership of the major environmental and social-justice NGOs
104. Use of dual narrative frames that emphasize victimhood internationally and achievement domestically
105. Higher rates of lactose tolerance and certain dietary adaptations linked to historical niche
106. Coordination of media coverage that treats group crime or misconduct as individual while treating notice of it as collective
107. Elevated frequency of Niemann-Pick disease type A alleles tracing to the founder event
108. Preferential placement in the advisory boards of the largest sovereign-wealth and pension funds
109. Systematic maintenance of separate statistical categories that prevent direct comparison of group outcomes
110. Capacity to treat the entire pattern as illegitimate to discuss while continuing to act on it
Design Prototype Test retweeted
Nobody on this board wants a segregated neighbourhood. Each person only asks that at least 3 in 10 of their neighbours look like them. If not, they jump to an empty spot where that is true.
Then the colours pull apart into big blocks, and the average person ends up with about 3 in 4 neighbours like them, far more than anyone asked for.
Thomas Schelling showed this in 1971 with pennies and dimes on graph paper, and he shared the 2005 economics Nobel for work on how individual choices add up to patterns nobody chose. The lesson is that a pattern in the whole does not prove a wish in the parts.
In the second run each person asks for 5 in 10, and the blocks are even sharper.
Design Prototype Test retweeted
> Haiti gangs snatch 4 Salvadorans
> they think they just bought themselves a negotiation
> Bukele goes public saying bring them back or you're done
> they try to hand him 4 random bodies and say it was them
> he calls out their bs
> sends 2,000 troops into Haiti
> tells the leader to gather their gangs so he can fight them
> gangs run to the UN for a deal
> refuses all deals
> ignores the UN mandate
> pushes into gang territory and starts cleaning them
> does more in two weeks than the UN did in 13 years
Bukele might be the greatest leader of the 21st century
Design Prototype Test retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake















































