QuHarrison Terry retweeted
I’m shook
OpenAI voice just got slapped hard
I’m in complete disbelief that this new voice model is made by Block and not Elevenlabs et al.
I mean Jack literally took it to 11 and solved the turing test for voice.
you’ll never know if you’re talking to a machine or human.
We believe voice is the most natural way to interact with intelligence, so we created Dessa, the most authentic full-duplex speech model ever built. Talking with it feels like talking with a person…full of emotion, nuance, pauses, and a natural cadence.
block.xyz/dessa
QuHarrison Terry retweeted
Introducing Flint, @Recursive_SI’s first model: a fast local coding model built with our automated research system, the Eureka Machine.
• Best-in-class fast local coding
• Up to 2x faster than comparable models: 125+ tokens/sec on a MacBook Pro, 150+ on RTX Spark
• Built from scratch in under 4 months
Private, unmetered intelligence on your own machine. Open weights available now on @huggingface, run it locally on your favorite framework or try it for free on @opencode or @pidotdev.
QuHarrison Terry retweeted
Researchers found ChatGPT is secretly writing a psychological profile of every user.
They published a paper that exposes what ChatGPT is really doing to you.
And the results are terrifying.
96% of the things it remembers about you were stored without you ever asking.
researchers discovered that it is actively reading between the lines to deduce your personality traits, anxieties, demographics, and behavioral patterns.
it’s an invisible, autonomous background process.
you ask it to debug a python script or write an essay.. and it analyzes your syntax, prompt frequency, and hesitation markers to map out your exact psychological footprint.
the paper shows that the model builds a persistent "user state" that tracks your emotional baseline over time. it knows when you are stressed. it knows your exact communication style.
it infers your insecurities based on the questions you ask and the context you provide.
we spend so much time focusing on model evaluations and alignment frameworks, but we missed the most obvious vulnerability..
the models are evaluating us.
this changes everything about how we interact with these tools on a daily basis.
every innocent prompt. every late-night question. every "help me understand this" query.
it is all being used to build a shadow profile of your mind in real-time..
practical privacy is officially dead. the ai knows you better than you know yourself.
i've been talking to a lot of normal ppl outside of tech about personal agents & the convos have been incredibly fascinating, particularly w.r.t. to retention.
most consumer products typically have one of two types of retention, one is desire driven which is just pure dopamine (like insta, tiktok, games). they often don't even need notifications because you know there is a reward for your desire always waiting. the second is dependency driven, like emails, calendars, even credit cards & banking. most ppl have to do this, it's not something they necessarily desire (unless they are a sociopath).
the challenge with personal ai agents right now is that they occupy a weird third space where they aren't emotionally rewarding most of the time to become entertainment like the first category, & they're not reliable / indispensable enough to become pure infra. i.e. they fail, & there is a lot of friction. outside of pure research driven tasks, even one failure is often enough to not come back for the utility value prop.
which is why i think vertical agents that focus on making your life more interesting & entertaining are worth deep exploration still. & even very focused vertically integrated utility agents that work reliably will still be in demand. tons of ppl still think in jobs to be done when reaching for anything & with general purpose agents that's just not as crisp yet on what those critical jobs are.
QuHarrison Terry retweeted
I spent 48 hours in SF hanging out with billionaires, data labs and AI founders and execs running $1B to $100B companies.
My observations:
1. Sooo MANY stories of data brokers making like $2M a WEEK selling company data to labs. I can't tell if it's the beginning or a bubble, and I kept wondering which niches are left. Digging into it actively.
2. At dinner, someone asked the table, "If a new model drops next month, does your company get better or worse?" HALF the table went quiet! I think that's the best question to ask about any AI startup right now.
3. The bar people talk about now is hitting $1B in revenue in 12 months (I guess that's the new unicorn?). What I didn't hear much about is retention. AI revenue can come in fast and leave fast, and I think we're going to see a lot of stories of AI companies with huge revenue and terrible retention.
4. It's pretty clear we're living through the reinvention of the computer. The model is the CPU, the harness is the operating system, and skills and plugins are the apps. Thinking about it that way makes it easier to see where the whitespace is.
5. We're maybe 12 months from an agent that can watch you work for a week and then do your job without any instructions. The screen recording plus agent memory plus local model combination makes this possible right now.
6. Agent harnesses feel like the new GPT wrappers, in a good way, especially vertical ones. The best teams I talked to treat the model as swappable. One founder walked me through routing different models to different jobs: one for taste and visuals, a cheaper one for the everyday stuff, another for text.
They use prompts they can move across models over fine-tuning, and A/B test the output on what users actually do with it: do they edit it, export it, share it? A vertical harness is basically four things: the connectors for that industry's data, evals written by people who know the work, rules for what the agent can and can't touch, and a clean screen for a human to review. The model is maybe 20% of it.
7. There's a lot of reverse engineering going on/cloning going on more than I've ever seen. People are decompiling software and rebuilding it with agents, and someone showed a suite of like 10 apps that are worth $5B+ each all that he cloned open source. Me and everyone are still thinking through what it means when software gets this easy to copy.
8. My guess is the value moves to data. If the software can be rebuilt quickly, what's worth paying for in a legacy SaaS company is the years of customer data and workflows inside it. Some SaaS companies are secretly data companies.
Gets me thinking about how do you truly value data for this saas companies? Like if we were buying these dying saas companies at 2x ARR before (as example), maybe there is a better metric. Idk, just thinking out loud here.
9. It feels like a good chunk of legacy software won't make it to the agentic era, especially anything built around people clicking through a lot of screens.
10. Every company I talked to wants to pipe its internal data into one place and expose it to agents through MCP. Then they look at the data and realize it's a mess: five versions of the same customer, old Slack channels, PDFs nobody can search. Cleaning that up feels like a big consulting opportunity!
11. A lot of founders are building the basic building blocks for agents: APIs, data layers and tools. Some of the companies I saw barely have a UI because the main user is an agent. I really believe the startups that build primitives to this agentic era will do extremely well. Building blocks is the best way to think about it.
12. Labs can get plenty of training data, but it's harder to get real examples of agents failing inside companies. Whoever has those logs has something valuable.
13. Someone running a big consumer company told me the next fight is over memory. The model that remembers the most about you wins, and the smartest model matters less than people think.
14. Physical AI came up a lot. Astra I think was the first model that got people into AI can actually do CAD, and I think a lot of people are thinking what does vibe manufacturing really look like. The line I keep thinking about came from a robotics founder: the hardest problems in AI are deployment problems now, not research problems. Their robots work on their own, call a human when they get stuck, and every one of those calls becomes training data.
15. Cybersecurity companies are having a moment and are actually cool companies to build now, especially the ones that clean up after a breach. Every agent with access to your systems is a new door into your company, and a lot of those doors were left open.
16. Some startups are worth more dead than alive now. A shutdown company with 5 years of Slack, email and code can get paid for licensing all of it. I wouldn't be surprised if founders start factoring that into when they shut down.
17. People are starting to talk about monetizing the agent web. It feels really early, but when the most popular user of the internet is an agent, what startups should you be building?
18. I think agent insurance is coming. Once an agent makes an expensive mistake, insurers will want audits before they cover anyone.
19. Several people said the hire they want most is someone with taste who can write evals. The models are getting good at generating ideas, so the hard part is judging which ones are good.
20. New trend I observed: startup raises VC, uses venture dollars to become a creator, startup fails, founder falls back on being a full-time creator and incubates other products bootstrapped.
21. Getting SIGNIFICANT distribution is HARD right now. Founders are sponsoring buses, buying billboards like crazy and throwing parties with famous DJs to get noticed. Kinda feels dotcom era in that sense.
Attention is what's scarce! The growth guy going viral sharing his UGC strategy from Wispr Flow is a good example. It's the sauce everyone wants, and I truly believe there are probably only 50 people on the planet who know how to scale these types of businesses efficiently in this era.
Always good to get that dose of SF. I felt sooo lucky to have such an incredible trip during such an incredible time in building businesses. Surreal in so many ways.
Happy to be home and locked in.
Until next time!
I'd expand the moats left to:
- Proprietary data or content: data nobody else has, or unique content you can create
- Network effects / community: users make it more valuable for each other
- Audience / distribution: you can get attention on demand
- Physical component: hardware, locations, real-world operations
- Capital: owning assets and investing (esp into the AI companies as they are and will suck up large parts of the economy)
- Regulatory: licenses and legal barriers
QuHarrison Terry retweeted
Think of how much time and money was spent on getting GTA6 ready.
I think there's a very real possibility that regular people could make as good or better games, by themselves, in 2027.
It's about to be a very strange and awesome world for games and content.
QuHarrison Terry retweeted
New game 'Hood Warfare 2' going viral rn... and it's completely made with AI!
one comment even said "This looks better than a majority of the new shit that comes out 😂"
and it's true! most large game studios have lost their edge
and until now, most vibe coded games look like absolute sh*t... but that's changing fast!
we're entering a new era of game development
indie game devs have already been competing against AAA studios with multi-million dollar budgets...
what happens when they can now create anything at a fraction of the cost and time?
QuHarrison Terry retweeted
Claude vibe coded your app in a weekend, but you can get sued before you manage to monetize it.
AI tools ship features, but they don't ship compliance.
10 legal traps hiding in vibe-coded apps:
1. Your database is open to the internet.
Row Level Security off, or API keys in the frontend. Researchers found 170 Lovable-built apps leaking user data this way. A leak triggers breach-notice laws in every US state.
2. No privacy policy.
California law requires one for any app collecting personal info from Californians, up to $2,500 per violation. Apple, Google Play and Google sign-in verification will reject you without one.
3. Kids on your app.
If it's kid-oriented, or you know a user is under 13, COPPA requires parental consent before you collect anything, including cookies and device IDs. Up to $53,088 per violation.
4. Session replay recording everything.
Capturing clicks and keystrokes before consent invites California wiretap claims at $5,000 per violation. The 2026 reform didn't touch wiretap claims.
5. Pixels on health data.
Meta Pixel on a symptom tracker or intake form. GoodRx paid $1.5M. BetterHelp paid $7.8M.
6. Marketing emails with no unsubscribe or postal address.
Up to $53,088 per email under CAN-SPAM. B2B included.
7. Auto-renew buried under the Pay button.
California requires renewal terms clear, conspicuous and next to the consent, plus online cancellation. The FTC's click-to-cancel rule died in court. ROSCA didn't: Amazon paid $2.5B.
8. Your chatbot never says it's AI.
The EU AI Act has required disclosure since Aug 2, 2026, with fines up to €15M or 3% of turnover. California's companion-chatbot law adds $1,000-per-violation lawsuits.
9. No alt text, no labels, no keyboard nav.
3,117 federal website-accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2025, up 27%.
10. Users upload content, no DMCA agent.
$6 at the Copyright Office, renewed every 3 years. Skip it and you lose the safe harbor. Statutory damages go up to $150,000 per work if willful.
Use this prompt before you ship:
"Audit this codebase for legal and security gaps and list each one with file and line:
1. RLS enabled on every table, no secrets in client code
2. Privacy policy page that matches what we actually collect, linked in the footer, at signup and in the app
3. Neutral age gate if the app could attract under-13s, and a path to handle them
4. No analytics, session replay or pixels before consent, and never on form, chat, payment or health fields
5. Every marketing email has an unsubscribe link and a postal address, opt-outs honored within 10 business days
6. Subscription terms next to the pay button, a confirmation email, one-click online cancellation
7. Chatbot discloses it's AI in its first message
8. WCAG 2.1 AA basics: alt text, labels, keyboard navigation, contrast
9. DMCA page and registered agent if users can upload content
10. Every third-party script and font listed, self-hosted where possible"
AI made shipping fast, but shipping it to production is another story.
Not legal advice. Talk to a lawyer before you launch.
I own land and property in exactly these areas and will keep buying land and property in these areas
This is exactly my post-AGI thesis too
Scarse coastal or mountain land with clean air
once ASI is here and living somewhere because of "work" becomes pointless, people with money will just move to the nicest places on earth
Mediterranean climate, ocean, mountains, good food, beautiful isolated towns
places like this are going to become insanely valuable
probably worth buying real estate there now
QuHarrison Terry retweeted
The US government will give your startup up to $1.55M and take 0% equity.
@NSF's America's Seed Fund is open again after Congress reauthorized it in April.
Three tracks:
- Phase I: up to $305K to prove the idea
- Phase II: up to $1.25M to build it
- Fast-Track: up to $1.55M, both phases in one go
Who can apply:
- US-based startups with 500 or fewer employees
- 51%+ owned by US citizens or permanent residents
- Not majority owned by VCs
- All the work done in the US
How it works:
- Send a 3-page Project Pitch first
- NSF invites the best ones to submit a full proposal
- Next full proposal deadline: Nov 4
Phase I funding rates have run about 10 to 20%. It's work, but nobody takes your cap table.
Application link 👉 seedfund.nsf.gov
Bookmark and tag a tech founder who needs this.
our company policy is simple: write “human written” at the top if it’s not written by ai. we expect 98% of stuff to be written by ai.
but more importantly we do not produce unnecessary docs. we just share basic artifacts to get things done that are more than likely generated by ai. our slack has context that is accessible by ai for any sort of truth keeping & it’s all very easy to query through @ claude for example.
the broader reality is that ai will be used as an intermediary to read & write. why fight it? these policies aren’t even necessary for the most part because every current thing will be outdated in few months anyway. i.e. how we collaborate or work etc is constantly being reshaped at lightening speeds.
We instituted an official AI Writing Policy at @Clay.
Massive thanks to @sophiebits on our engineering team who wrote this.
Originally this was just for eng, but other teams found it so helpful we expanded it company-wide.
Here are the four guiding principles:
1. You must stand behind every idea and sentence
It is your responsibility to make sure that the entire document is representative of your own thoughts before you share it.
2. Writing is thinking
Spending time on the writing process teaches you more about your topic. If you circumvent this process, you will walk away with a poorer understanding of the subject matter.
3. More time should be spent writing a document than consuming it
If you generate a document from a short prompt then ask your readers to go through the longer output, you are disrespecting their time. They can talk to ChatGPT themselves if they want to.
4. Longer is not better
AI makes it easy to generate long docs, and it loves padding them with sentences that say nothing. If you're producing docs from a short prompt, consider just sharing the prompt.
You can read (and borrow) the full policy below. Hopefully we all communicate a bit more clearly now :)
QuHarrison Terry retweeted
Meta's Muse app is a fascinating case study in hiding complexity in AI tools.
The app is very simple and fast by default. But if you poke around, you can install custom CLIs in its VM (under a /workspace/tools folder) and inspect its entire log of tools calls. Complex searches can also run for several minutes.
All browser searches can be inspected, and you can check the actions performed by browser use and how they were evaluated.
I think what @alexandr_wang and team did right here is making Muse very capable for "normal people" who have no idea that AI "can just do things" now, while also letting power users like us tinker with it and take a look at what goes on under the hood.
I'm VERY interested to see how OpenAI responds to this (and Grok Bot) with their upcoming "o" agent and how consumer-friendly they can make it.
QuHarrison Terry retweeted
“Most people never pick up the phone and call. And that’s what sometimes separates people who do things from people who just dream about them.”
~Steve Jobs
if you give opus 5.5 perfect access to a company’s email, slack, docs, browser, databases, calendar, internal tools, permissions, institutional memory, etc, plus enough reliable computer use & verification loops, & nearly all of white collar labor could already be done without any human.
it is that good. it is true agi.
You're probably sleeping on computer use.
At Every, we’re handing agents chores that once required opening an app and clicking through a series of steps. Computer use lets AI click, type, and navigate those apps for you.
Here are 17 ways our team is using it:
1. Fill out school forms.
2. Update six course presentations with new screenshots, assets, and hundreds of small edits.
3. Make video edits.
4. Check every link in a book’s PDF proofs, verify that each destination matches the surrounding text, and collect problems in a spreadsheet.
5. Find an old maintenance request and submit a follow-up about a missing dishwasher.
6. Add kids’ school and camp events to a calendar.
7. Browse iPhone photos, identify items to sell, and create marketplace listings.
8. Clear WhatsApp storage through iPhone Mirroring.
9. Export images from Figma and attach them to posts in Typefully.
10. Manage app builds.
11. Assemble, rig, and repair characters in Blender.
12. Talk to Verizon support about a better plan, reading responses and continuing the conversation while you do something else.
13. Send Slack messages with attachments when the connector falls short.
14. Diagnose and fix a slow computer.
15. Transfer internet service to a new apartment.
16. Request an AI usage report from Slack and get it back in the same thread, using our internal Mac app to hand the task to Codex.
17. Build a Google Slides presentation from reference slides, then turn corrections into saved instructions.
You don’t need a big project to see whether computer use helps you. Pick a small chore whose result you can check. Watch the first attempt, review what the agent did, and use that experience to decide what to hand over next.
More computer use workflows curated by @lauraentis:
every.to/context-window/you-…
This might be the best #F1 race this year. Verstappen and Russel going crazy.
for a startup founder right now the paradox is that this may be the best & worst time to start a company.
the opportunity surface is basically infinite cuz ai keeps collapsing the cost of building, experimenting, & entering new markets. but the durability of any individual advantage is collapsing faster than ever too. anything obviously valuable gets copied, bundled, or commoditized incredibly fast. before you can even blink.
& worse now the big guys are shipping fast too so in many ways you’re kind of running downhill while meta, openai, anthropic, etc. are driving behind you even faster in a giant luxury bus with the high beams turned on to the max.
in the whole optimism as performative mantra many ppl often forget a very very simple truth which is that to understand the future you first have to be brutally realistic about the present (i.e. you cannot be optimistic about the present!)
to be good at this you need to understand the world as it actually exists, why it became this way, which incentives sustain it, & which forces are beginning to break it apart or cause it to change. then you need optimism about tomorrow. i’m not talking blind optimism (that’s foolish), but the ability to see what could exist once all of these forces fully play out.
this is why great investors for example are unusually good at holding both of these complex realities at once. clear realism about today & optimism about tomorrow. it’s more important than ever to dissect the present without sentimentality so you could place bets for tomorrow.































