Andrew (@r930596) header
Andrew (@r930596) profile picture

please block me

Joined April 2025
Photo by Andrew (@r930596)Photo by Andrew (@r930596)Photo by Andrew (@r930596)Photo by Andrew (@r930596)Photo by Andrew (@r930596)Photo by Andrew (@r930596)Photo by Andrew (@r930596)Photo by Andrew (@r930596)Photo by Andrew (@r930596)Photo by Andrew (@r930596)
What a retard. He can't tell the difference between criminals using a network to move money and someone stealing 100m from that criminal Why are we surrounded by these fucking mouth breathing retards?
The thief who stole $100 million in BTC is going to have a hard time spending most of it. Every coin is sitting in plain sight, tracked by Galaxy, the FBI, and thousands of others. People call Bitcoin a criminal's currency. It might be the worst money for crime ever invented.
23
These people are literally unemployable. These are the types of people that will take a 10 minute task and make it last 6 hours so they can feign productivity. They'll call it "job security" They are leeches
Replying to @allengilmer
And where does this take us? When every economic activity and means of production has become automated, when the only jobs left are CEO and prostitute, what do we do then? Wage capitalism has no long term solution for job loss. (At least not one that's good for workers.)
16
Look at this idiot defend a purposely manipulative question. The question is worded to get a high yes response from people so that the conclusion from the data can be manipulated into what the question asked wants. There's no misreading, there's intentional vagueness.
So it needs to be worded better because people like you intentionally misread it?
8
People are taking this so seriously from multiple sides. This is a flash in the pan. A small plate of red meat to whip people up. A "see we tried!" type of do-nothing gesture. Those stores aren't going to last any significant amount of time or have any positive impact.
Two people: * A poor person living in public housing in NYC * A poor person living in public housing in New Jersey Neither one pays anything toward the city-run grocery store subsidies, but the NYC resident can shop at the stores, and the Jersey resident can't. The socialists reject this exact same logic for immigration, but happily apply it when they want to keep food on their shelves. The food migrants from New Jersey are just seeking economic opportunity! Surely the wealthy citizens of NYC understand it is their moral obligation to spread their wealth beyond just the legal residents of their borders!
9
NO ONE is stopping you from doing this Yet socialists want to STOP poor people from having access to credit.
Replying to @DelusionPosting
Before I start, I do NOT condone communism or socialism. HOWEVER... the idea of a BARTERING system, where people pay each other by supplying each other goods or providing services to one another (and vice versa), sounds better than a currency based system. People could make and sign contracts with one another, that lists out the conditions each party needs to meet before recieving the provided product or service. If you want carrots from a neighbor's garden, and he wants the eggs from your chicken coop, then you'd both write/sign a contract that lists out what items will be traded for what, and then follow through. If a party fails to supply the promised services or products, then legal action could be persued.
2
This clown has no problem with tarrifs. He's upset that he didn't get to stamp his own name on it. He's upset that Congress didn't do it. He's just a kid throwing a tantrum on the playground because he didn't get his way.
What a nightmare. By implementing the tariffs illegally, and now having to unwind them, the Trump administration created over $100 billion of profit for corporations selling foreign products, at the expense of American consumers. Your refund: $0.00 Apple’s profit: $2.2 billion
5
Lmao from "tarrifs just hurt the people" to "we should just have a national tarrif on everything for everyone" in one fucking post. Who is this clown? Something tells me he "represents" some district somewhere.
Replying to @AnthonyGalli
it’s not odd at all. In fact it’s consistent. According to our Constitution, U.S. tax policy is the domain of Congress, not the executive branch. If we want to replace income tax with tariffs, let’s do it in Congress. The ham-fisted tariff/tax changes of this admin backfired.
10
No, we don't want to be assigned shit But there's a biological reason women can only assign tasks and not complete them.
is there a biological reason men want to be Assigned Tasks or are yall just dumb (no offense)
12
Framing China as either an ally or enemy is for mental simpletons
Replying to @HKslap69
I would LOVE if china were an ally instead of an enemy. Such a waste.
4
If you say flooding humanity to kill them all is "evil" that's just an opinion.
2
Wtf is "evil"? Watch the secularist use a religious standard of evil to deny religion. You can't make this shit up
Christians after realising their God is evil:
2
All these people act like entitled women. They probably would cluck and clack about this with their feminine friends like a bunch of hens. The winner is entitled to nothing more than a 6 pack of beer. And even that is not an obligation. It's a kind gesture.
Replying to @KrevinSac
He's acting as one How'd the $700 get there?
4
The conceit that people in the past were all dumb, gullible rubes to whom we are obviously & profoundly intellectually superior is a defining feature of our own era. It keeps us from grappling in a real way with deep questions about the nature of reality, esp. regarding religion.
Imagine if people in the Middle Ages saw this
366
1,923
106
29,300
1,058,058
We are surrounded by babies and children and idiots and males that act like women. Both OP and the winner are retards. If they were gentlemen it would be settled with ease: "Look bro I get it, you can't give me the $700, but you should buy me a case of beer or something"
I love this post because 80% of TikTok replies say OP is in the right while 80% of Reddit replies say he’s the asshole
3
Watch the atheist leap, with zero justification, from "I've seen the sun rise every day" to "therefore it will continue to rise everyday because that's what it's supposed to do!" It's amazing they just grant themselves this leap like a freebie.
Incorrect- by definition they don't need proof as they are self-evident "The sun rises daily" is an axiom because everyone can observe it & day is defined by it Its not blind faith but the understanding you don't have to prove basic facts constantly
6
This is what happens when you destroy God and morality. You measure goodness as correctness and intelligence. Some of the smartest people I've ever known are degenerate evil scum bag wretched humans. And some of the dumbest people I've ever known are salt of the Earth.
A lot of people, probably even the majority, don’t really have any concept of “smart” that’s independent of having the correct opinions about things. You can be smart one day and dumb the next. You’ll often see them say that somebody, “used to be smart and what happened!?!” by which they mean that their opinions changed.
3
As a wise man named MF Doom once said: "The more ya know the more ya know ya don't know SHIT"
Beginners are overconfident because the extent of the unknown looks very small. As they learn, their "unknown box" expands faster than their skill, and that is a crushing feeling. You have to grit through it. It's almost impossible to explain this; they have to live it.
1
1
1
30
Yes
Hasan Piker: Donald Trump did it. He banned transgender athletes. Did that help you? Do you feel better now? Do you feel like your life is improved in any significant manner?
4
This is your standard stock atheist. "Why should there be 'meaning'?" As he goes on to explain that the laws of physics describe things. L M A O
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
1
2
Why can atheists ground logic in a story they like but Zeus worshippers aren't allowed the same privilege?
Replying to @RevIsaacWirtz
The question between us is not what can you assert a god does, but does a god exist? If your god is as fictional as Zeus, Ra, Thor, etc, then no, you are not grounding logic in anything but a story you like. Our ancestors making up stories, does not obligate us to pretend that the first to say "one god" got it right.
2