Assistant Professor @ University of Washington, Co-Director of RAIVN lab (https://xitter.cf/t.co/f0BWKyjoeA), Director of PRIOR team (https://xitter.cf/t.co/l9RzTesMSM)

California, USA
Joined August 2011
Can brute scale fix Vision-Language reasoning? Spoiler alert: No! 🛑 Our #TACL paper "Scale Can't Overcome Pragmatics" shows that human reporting bias limits VLM reasoning, and scale alone can’t fix it. Come see our poster TODAY at #EMNLP2026! 4:45–6:15pm @ Hall H, Board 371 🧵
2
5
23
1,342
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
Humanoid fighting looks easy. Humanoid catching is hard. You have ~1 second to perceive, predict, and move your whole body to act. Meet Reflex: our framework for catching human-thrown boxes on a @UnitreeRobotics G1 using onboard RGB-D. Thread 👇
17
27
18
230
43,443
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
As AI systems enter a recursive self-improvement loop, the central question is whether it can systematically move beyond human-designed methods to genuinely extend the scientific and intelligence frontier. What’s missing is a neutral, open standard for evaluating these capabilities in real, production-scale intelligence development. Today, we’re releasing OpenRSI-Index v0.1: evaluating whether AI can recursively improve itself and push the boundaries of intelligence and science, on production-scale clusters with 1k GPUs. We turn fully open-source projects into autoresearch environments, with agent trajectories lasting 60+ hours. Building v0.1 took 100K+ H100-hours. We’re building an ecosystem with and for the research community: let RSI benefit everyone, and let everyone shape RSI together. We invite task contributors and compute partners to build this open benchmark with us - all contributors will be included as paper authors. Shape RSI with us: 🌐 Website: index.openrsi.foundation/ind… 🛠️ GitHub: github.com/OpenRSI-Foundatio… 🤝 Contribute: github.com/OpenRSI-Foundatio…
18
58
32
232
135,377
Precision is vital for robotic manipulation. Language reasoning (VLAs) are limited in their precision. Pixel generation (WAMs) are overkill. GAMs are an alternative to both. It uses 3D grounding models instead of language models of video generators.
VLAs? WAMs? Are language and video models the right foundations for robotics? Introducing Grounded Action Model (GAM): a new paradigm that builds robot foundation models on top of a pretrained 3D grounding model. Ground first. Then learn to act. 🧵👇
3
4
37
5,127
3D/4D reconstruction is one of the great achievements of computer vision. With roots in photogrammetry, multi-view geometry was much studied (e.g. Hartley & Zisserman). In the last decade, it was successfully combined with deep learning. Shape priors which come from recognition got incorporated (e.g. for humans, in HMR) and recent systems like VGGT and SAM 3D can do amazing stuff. This progress is directly relevant for robotics, which (duh) operates in the 3D world. Many robotics papers in the learning era weren't exploiting 3D structure, which IMHO is just wasting valuable signal. But there has been a strong real2sim2real tradition for years e.g. here are two projects from my group (and there are many others, I am not claiming exclusivity). I am glad that people have rediscovered this capability with Astra. But please do give credit to human researchers, not just AI models. zhec.github.io/rhoi/ , videomimic.net/
1
451
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
VLAs? WAMs? Are language and video models the right foundations for robotics? Introducing Grounded Action Model (GAM): a new paradigm that builds robot foundation models on top of a pretrained 3D grounding model. Ground first. Then learn to act. 🧵👇
8
44
8
431
693,246
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
🔥 HumanCLAW is now fully open-sourced! github.com/Human-CLAW/HumanC…
🦾HumanCLAW: Can Vision-Language Models Act Through a Body? A VLM can spot the sofa in a second. But can it get a body there and sit down? We call it Action Intelligence, and our work decouples it from motor control so it can finally be measured. Today’s best models turn out to be surprisingly bad at it. 🔻human-claw.github.io/
1
9
100
10,930
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
We used to do vision-language grounding in a unidirectional way: language tells the model what to look for, and the model finds it in the image. But real grounding should go both ways — given an image and text, a model should discover what concepts are being referred to, where they appear, and how the two sides correspond, without being told the relevant text spans in advance. ConCor-1 is our attempt to revisit this standard paradigm. We formulate grounding as bidirectional concept correspondence, where the model jointly discovers referential concepts in language and vision and explicitly recovers their correspondence. I’m excited about this direction because it moves grounding from answering “where is this?” toward understanding the full correspondence structure between what we say and what we see. ConCor-1 is just the first step — we’re already working on extending this bidirectional correspondence view to video! Huge kudos to @ziqigaothu , whom I’ve had the pleasure of mentoring and who will be joining UW as a PhD student this fall!
Vision-language grounding is typically formulated around language-conditioned visual localization: language specifies or guides what to look for, and the model localizes the corresponding visual entities. Can grounding instead explicitly recover the correspondence on both sides? Excited to share ConCor-1: Vision-Language Grounding as Bidirectional Concept Correspondence 📄 arxiv.org/abs/2608.07886 🧵
2
18
2,119
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
Vision-language grounding is typically formulated around language-conditioned visual localization: language specifies or guides what to look for, and the model localizes the corresponding visual entities. Can grounding instead explicitly recover the correspondence on both sides? Excited to share ConCor-1: Vision-Language Grounding as Bidirectional Concept Correspondence 📄 arxiv.org/abs/2608.07886 🧵
1
5
3
20
4,794
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
Robotics felt different this month. Google DeepMind and Anthropic made the same question hard to ignore: can a reasoning model decide what a whole body/robot should do next? Gemini Robotics 2 put an embodied reasoning model above a VLA for whole-body control. Anthropic tested general-purpose reasoning models at several levels of control. - deepmind.google/blog/gemini-… - anthropic.com/research/claud… The bad news is clear. General-purpose reasoning models still cannot control a humanoid on their own. They need a pretrained policy underneath. Still, I think this might actually work. A strong model (w/ excellent multimodal and reasoning capabilities) could really do it one day. HumanCLAW is our attempt to get an early glimpse of that future.
🦾HumanCLAW: Can Vision-Language Models Act Through a Body? A VLM can spot the sofa in a second. But can it get a body there and sit down? We call it Action Intelligence, and our work decouples it from motor control so it can finally be measured. Today’s best models turn out to be surprisingly bad at it. 🔻human-claw.github.io/
10
31
1
230
44,628
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
"Pick up the butterfinger and put it in the bowl" MolmoAct2 takes any text instruction and turns it into action. Got it running on my $150 robot arm and my humble 4060 gpu.
7
7
3
68
11,530
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
The best open-source VLA? MolmoAct2 - Beats π0.5 across 7 sim and real benchmarks, and its embodied-reasoning backbone (Molmo2-ER) tops GPT-5 and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.5 on 9 of 13 benchmarks. - A discrete-token VLM is grafted to a flow-matching continuous-action expert through a per-layer KV-cache connection - 2 design innovations 1) bridge a frozen discrete-token VLM to a continuous-control expert by feeding it the backbone's per-layer KV cache rather than sharing hidden states or fusing at the output, giving the controller depth-aligned access to the full visual-language context 2) reasoning latency isn't fixed: re-running perception only on the parts of the scene that changed exploits temporal redundancy to keep the geometric grounding while cutting the cost
6
13
105
8,898
📣 Call for Papers — 1st Workshop on Multimodal Digital Agents (MDA) @ ECCV 2026 How should AI agents see and act across web, desktop, and mobile interfaces? We're bringing together work on vision-centric digital agents — perception, reasoning, benchmarks, safety, and more. 🗓️ Sept 8, 2026 (ECCV) · ✍️ Submit by July 29 (AoE) 📄 Full paper (≤14 pages, ECCV-accepted welcome) or extended abstract (≤4 pages) — non-archival, 🏆 best paper award 🎤 Speakers include Graham Neubig, Ranjay Krishna, Qianhui Wu & Alexandre Drouin Submit / details → mda-workshop.allen.ai/ #ECCV2026 #ComputerVision #AIagents #Multimodal #GUIagents
1
8
4
28
9,947
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
MolmoMotion is not just another cool work built on top of Molmo2’s video grounding capabilities. It shows grounding in 3D can enable motion forecasting (for both data and capabilities), which serves as an objective and representation for controllable video generation and robotics!
We're releasing MolmoMotion, a 3D motion forecasting model. Given one or a few video frames, 3D points on an object, & an instruction like "Put the white bowl on the table," MolmoMotion predicts where those points will go over the next few seconds in a shared 3D world frame. 🧵
6
25
4,163
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
Thrilled to introduce MolmoMotion🚀where we found 3D motion prediction is becoming very doable with existing tools. And this capability can be very useful for downstream tasks like Robotics📷and VideoGen📷 As always, MolmoMotion is fully open! Great work led by @jianingnz @Michael3014018 @cassieyangyj
We're releasing MolmoMotion, a 3D motion forecasting model. Given one or a few video frames, 3D points on an object, & an instruction like "Put the white bowl on the table," MolmoMotion predicts where those points will go over the next few seconds in a shared 3D world frame. 🧵
11
35
3,473
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
We're releasing MolmoMotion, a 3D motion forecasting model. Given one or a few video frames, 3D points on an object, & an instruction like "Put the white bowl on the table," MolmoMotion predicts where those points will go over the next few seconds in a shared 3D world frame. 🧵
14
62
15
395
568,751
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
What if VLMs could imagine before answering? IPT supervises visual intermediate states for spatial reasoning: 1. Path tracing → side view 2. Perspective taking → new viewpoint 3. Multiview counting → top-down map Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2606.03988
4
15
1
69
9,253
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
What if VLMs could imagine visually before answering spatial questions? New paper: Imaginative Perception Tokens (IPT) teach multimodal LMs to reason about hidden 3D structure — without generating images at inference time. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2606.03988
5
10
59
69,197
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
Picture your living room. If you sat on the sofa, would the TV be on your right or left? You didn't reason in words,you placed yourself in the scene.Imagining in visual space, not text.Exactly what VLMs can't do.Our new paper tackles this with Imaginative Perception Tokens(IPT)🧵
1
12
2
31
7,215
Ranjay Krishna retweeted
Given the strong community adoption and real-world deployment of MolmoAct2 on YAM, we're introducing zero-shot evaluation of MolmoAct2 Bimanual YAM in simulation. Now you can test out our models without a real-world robot and build on them! Code: github.com/allenai/molmoact2 Simulation built on Maniskill!
Robotics models often struggle outside controlled environments. Ours is built to work in real ones. Today we're launching MolmoAct 2, which can assist with a host of chores & lab tasks, plus the MolmoAct 2-Bimanual YAM dataset—the largest open robotics dataset of its kind. 🧵
1
16
4
174
37,346