Advocate for reproductive rights. The basis of my position is that govt has no legitimate duty or purpose for denying access to abortion.
Lumberton, NJ
Joined December 2017
- Tweets8.3K
- Following76
- Followers112
- Likes2.1K
Now you're just being a biology denier, Doc. Thank you for scrambling to defend your paradigm so carelessly that I can turn anti abort talking points on you.
Cardiocytes, neurons, and neutrophils are somatic cells that serve a somatic function to the individual. They cannot...
...your developing children. You cannot make a zygote from any other cell.
The Gilbert chapter you linked for me was a discussion about when the developing individual becomes a human in a moral sense, and he pointed out that scientists are not in agreement on that topic. What...
The human lifecycle actually begins decades before fertilization, anti aborts just don't want to admit that bcuz it blows up their paradigm.
It is unreasonable to conclude a cell suddenly becomes an individual only after a particular cellular event when embryology itself...
...biological lifecycle begins with oogenesis. And anti aborts are perfectly fine with "killing" innocent developing humans then.
It is also not logical, and downright hypocritical, to call a denial of life saving service "murder" while denying and encouraging the same denial...
Abstinence and birth control are an active decision that the developing human does not get to live, and anti aborts make that decision all the time. In fact, they encourage it.
It is not logical to condemn a denial of life saving service in one case while intentionally..
Egg and sperm are not 50% contributors to the egg's transformation into the zygote. The sperm cell delivers only the paternal genome and is otherwise dissolved by the egg. The egg is the cell that becomes the zygote. It is on the development path & is already the developing child
Anti aborts are delusionally self-important, comparing their movement to human rights historical heroes while promoting human rights violations, authoritarianism, and further govt oppression.
Abortion bans haven't saved any babies bcuz most of the children a woman could...
October 16 is the anniversary of John Brown's Harper's Ferry.raid.
That end goal of anti-slavery abolitionists wasn't achieved by opposing anti-slavery laws in some States because there were still slave States. The conflict resulted in violence, a massacre in Lawrence led by proslavery David Atchison, then vengeance raids by John Brown, & finally, a Civil War.
We can do better & already have. They had the Dred Scot opinion. We have Dobbs.
Anti aborts cannot address how govt should conclude it has a duty to protect the right to life of developing humans all the way back to fertilization but is specifically NOT authorized to protect the same individual beforehand.
There is no constitutional statute that...
I can't 4 the life of me understand how anti aborts work out in their heads that our founding fathers, giving a list of powers to a new govt designed to serve the ppl, were thinking...
"...& please be sure to take from us the liberty to make our own family planning decisions."
A human organism is not a body cell of the parent, unlike a gamete.
The purpose & function of government were laid out inthe founding documents of the US, Declaration of Independence & Preamble to the Constitution.
Prenatal humans are created with inalienable rights the Constitution is to preserve those for "our posterity."
Constitutional authority doesn't endow human rights, only civil rights such as those for former slaves & their descendents in the 13th, 14th, & 15th Amendments.
It is some next level confirmation bias when you take a grievance letter from an oppressed people to a tyrant as proof that what oppressed people really want is govt-imposed gestational servitude
A human organism is not a body cell of the parent, unlike a gamete.
The purpose & function of government were laid out inthe founding documents of the US, Declaration of Independence & Preamble to the Constitution.
Prenatal humans are created with inalienable rights the Constitution is to preserve those for "our posterity."
Constitutional authority doesn't endow human rights, only civil rights such as those for former slaves & their descendents in the 13th, 14th, & 15th Amendments.
Defining a threshold of legal or moral personhood is unavoidable even when anti aborts do it.
They claim to value all human life while they deny life to their own cellular developing children with the same deliberate intention as abortion, just like the rest of us
