Ron. We had first called out @UK_MTO several months back, when we asked them as to why USN attacks were not being reported. Then we found they unreported the number of attacks on vessels (likely under orders), the extent of the damage to vessel and environmental damage as well (SIDR was repeatedly reported as not leaking crude) and we also found they were fudging casualty numbers (by increasing them while reporting an Iranian strike). After chasing them several times, they reported they could not verify all attacks and hence had to drop several of them, however while they also cannot verify USN supported transits, they still publish the numbers as reported to them with a disclaimer. You would do well to lookup the roles of spotters in the Hormuz, the recent uptick in speedboats and those that shine lights to identify, the claims of mines and UUVs recently cited. The hailings by both parties, we have uploaded a few - both by IRGC and USN in the last weeks. You may want to check on the various scoops we've pushed along. USN directives to ships on Radar/GPS/GNSS and AIS and the ability that USN acknowledges that IRGC can still read radar emissions even when digitally transiting dark. (Something the IRGC hailing shows, as they identify vessels by coords/names) On written forms that are needed to be filled over associated dangers of crossing the Hormuz such as with mines and IRGC drone attacks. Crazy time for sailors out there who're risking it all to keep things moving.