Pinned Tweet
Most people graduate college without ever leading anything real.
Four years of classes. Clubs. "Involvement."
But 1,925 students decided differently in 2025.
They didn't just talk about ideas. They changed laws, built businesses, organized in war zones.
Here's what happened: 馃У
In 1920, Ludwig von Mises asked one question that broke the whole model. If the state owns the steel mills, then nobody is buying steel and nobody is selling it. No buying, no selling, no price.
So now you鈥檙e running a country. A shipment of steel comes in. Hospital? Bridge? Tank? And if it鈥檚 a hospital, which city? Built by which workers, who would otherwise have been building what?
A price is what squeezes all of that into one number you can actually use.
Take it away and the planner is guessing. Smart, well meaning, and guessing, with a country.
That鈥檚 where the shortages came from. Not bad luck. Not the wrong man in charge.
So when someone tells you socialism just needs better people, ask them who sets the price of steel. Better people still have to answer that.
French students took to the streets for more teachers and better school buildings.
A month later, shops were being looted in Paris and Marseille, and the town hall of Limoges was nearly destroyed by fire.
The cause is in the French budget, and France has been here before. 馃У
Whoever burns a shop and whoever spends money the young must repay take from the same place: what the next generation inherits. Burke wrote about it in 1790, as the French Revolution unfolded. He is still right today.
"But one of the first and most leading principles on which the commonwealth and the laws are consecrated is, lest the temporary possessors and life-renters in it, unmindful of what they have received from their ancestors or of what is due to their posterity, should act as if they were the entire masters, that they should not think it among their rights to cut off the entail or commit waste on the inheritance by destroying at their pleasure the whole original fabric of their society, hazarding to leave to those who come after them a ruin instead of an habitation鈥攁nd teaching these successors as little to respect their contrivances as they had themselves respected the institutions of their forefathers."




