Pinned Tweet
The Boston Herald's headline "69% of Massachusetts residents believe police concealed evidence" in the Karen Read case is grossly misleading:
There are over 7 million MA residents. Their sample included a mere 709 MA residents which is 0.0101285714% of the population. 69% of 709 is 489 people which is 007% of the MA population.
489 people out of Massachusetts' roughly 7 million residents is just 0.007% — seven one-thousandths of one percent. It doesn't even come close to representing one full percent of the population. It's an incredibly tiny sliver.
BREAKING: All US flights grounded because of 'extraordinary circumstances'
news.sky.com/story/us-airpor…
sky retweeted
Replying to @BostonDefender
You targeted a 17 year old high school kid and smeared him with lies claiming he was involved in a murder.
You lied about a photograph and swore to the court it was Jen McCabe's daughter. Repeatedly.
On the courthouse steps and in court filings you falsely claimed Michael Proctor had a "close", "intimate" relationship with Brian Albert.
You knew the struggling Internet marketer you hooked up with was wiretapping witnesses.
You knew he was going to their homes, their businesses, and their children's events to harass them.
You have made zero effort to correct your lies.
You should not be lecturing anyone about priorities.
sky retweeted
Replying to @FerventHosp @netflix
“Blue Paint Welcher” ( the PHD accident reconstructionist and biomechanical engineer) proved that the area of John’s arm wounds was at the same height and angle as Karen’s broken taillight.
He also explained the physics of a clipping versus a direct hit.
And then he did full digital and in-person measurements to see if Karen’s taillight could break from the Traverse. The Traverse can’t physically touch the SUV due to the bumpers, which rules out that theory.
Guess who canceled their measurement testing? ARCCA.
sky retweeted
💙Yuri Bukhenik (Marine Corps veteran, MSP)
💙Brian Higgins (Army veteran, ATF)
💙Brian Albert (Marine Corps veteran, retired BPD)
You don't get to wave the flag, post "Thank you for your service," and then turn around and support doxxing their families, death threats, protests at their homes, or trying to destroy their careers because their testimony didn't fit a preferred narrative. That's not principled — it's tribal. Real respect for military service (or law enforcement) means protecting the rule of law and the integrity of the process, even when the witnesses say things you don't like.
sky retweeted
Replying to @BrotherCounsel
A better use of your time be actually trying to understand the evidence and expert testimony better. You make huge factual errors every time you discuss this case and grossly misrepresent the actual expert testing, testimony, and conclusions. You mislead your audience constantly.
sky retweeted
Imagine going after a victim’s friends. For years, Aidan Kearney has targeted John O’Keefe’s family and closest friends—The people who loved John.
And boy does he hates when they talk about John. When they remember their friend. When they remind people that there was a victim in this case. He mocks them. He shames them.
Yet the person who should be talking about John the most never has. Karen Read has never shared a funny story about him, never spoken kindly about him, never reflected on the life he lived or the person he was. The man she claimed to love is never remembered by her at all.
That’s what should appall people.
Normal people understand that there are lines you don’t cross. A victim’s loved ones should never become targets. I genuinely don’t understand how some of you have convinced yourselves that this behavior is normal, let alone acceptable. You cheer when he goes after John’s friends and family—whether it’s chasing his friends down a street with an unhinged mob, like something out of the Salem witch trials, or dedicating entire shows to attacking, dehumanizing, and vilifying the people John O’Keefe loved.
Whatever your opinion of the case, going after a victim’s family, friends, and loved ones is both demented and indefensible. Do Better.
#JusticeForTheOkeefeFamily
sky retweeted
Imagine having such a depraved heart and mind that you drive to a murder victim's home to do a victory dance when his killer walks free.
John O'Keefe's life mattered. He deserved better and so does every person who loved him.
Karen Read, her lawyers, her sycophant content creators, and her fans are trash.
sky retweeted
There is just something thrilling about being announced when you're in the White House, when you're outside the Oval Office, and you hear the aide say, "Sir, your 7 o’clock low-ratings dummy is here."
Dinner at the White House, Again
HBO Real Time October 23, 2026
sky retweeted
During the harsh winter months, animal protection officers in Poland are using drones equipped with thermal imaging cameras to search remote properties for dogs exposed to dangerous cold. These cameras detect heat signatures, helping officers locate animals
To claim physics proves there was no collision is FALSE and a complete misunderstanding of science.
In forensics, reconstructing a crash backward with imprecise starting data is an "ill-posed inverse problem"—meaning the math is literally incomplete. You cannot use physics to rule out a hit-and-run when you don't know the car's or the body's precise starting positions. Anyone claiming the laws of physics "prove" it didn't happen lacks a BASIC understanding of Physics 101.
sky retweeted
Replying to @blonderockinred
The evidence shows that Karen Read recklessly reversed at 24.5 mph with the throttle 75% engaged in a drunken rage after which John O'Keefe never moved again.
Within minutes of striking him in a sideswipe event which caused him to lose balance and fall resulting in a catastrophic head injury, Karen Read was calling him, leaving messages in which she screamed "John I fucking HATE you!!!"
Microscopic fragments of the taillight were embedded in his clothes. His DNA was on the taillight. His hair was found on the SUV. There was no snow on ground beneath John when he was found indicating he had been lying there before the heavy snow began.
The next morning, through the blinding snow and pitch black, Karen Read was able to see him on the ground because, as she would later say, she "expected" him to be there.
The evidence of Karen Read's culpability in John's death is voluminous. It is both concrete and circumstantial and it paints a terrifying picture of an angry, abusive drunk who left a wounded John O'Keefe on the lawn of 34 Fairview to freeze to death.
sky retweeted
The next time some FKR CULT idiot says John O'Keefe should have had broken bones, or his arm would break if it struck a taillight at 24mph, show them this to prove them wrong.
NOTE: Turtleboy is not a reputable source.
AAA, IIHS, and TAP Plastics are all reputable sources.
























