Bradford Harriman retweeted
Replying to @wallyrashid
This arrogance and entitlement is not what people want to see. Voters did not turn out in record numbers just to get the same tired old crap! WE DESERVE BETTER!
Bradford Harriman retweeted
So damn arrogant.
“The issue is not me. I'll be reelected as majority leader. But the issue is focusing on the American people and what they want.”
Bradford Harriman retweeted
Hi, Jared.
Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
President Trump today advanced an important discussion with several European leaders about the need for a broader European security architecture that can help establish the conditions for lasting peace.
Building on his leadership and the substantive work undertaken this week in Brussels with Ukraine, NATO, and our European partners, @SEPeaceMissions and I wanted to share some of the objectives guiding our ongoing discussions.
For more than 30 years, Europe and Russia have struggled to establish a sustainable security framework. Decades of mistrust, competing security concerns, and the devastating consequences of this war make this an extraordinarily difficult challenge, but one that is essential to lasting peace.
Our objective is to develop practical arrangements that address the security concerns of all sides, reduce the risk of future conflict, and create a more stable and predictable security environment.
We are exploring five principal goals: permanent security consultations, reliable crisis communications, greater military transparency, reciprocal measures to reduce escalation risks, and an enduring framework for long-term European security and stability.
Any arrangements must fully respect the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and independent decision-making of every nation. Each country will retain authority over its own security and alliances, and no country would have a veto over another’s sovereign choices. NATO will remain central to European collective defense, and this initiative would build upon existing institutions and commitments.
We will continue consultations through the Shell Bay format with Ukraine, NATO, the EU, and our European partners, expanding engagement to ensure that all relevant perspectives and ideas are considered. We will also engage Russia as part of the peace negotiations.
Next week in Abu Dhabi, the United States will convene the first trilateral peace discussions with Ukraine and Russia since February. All parties remain intensely engaged in preparing for substantive and productive negotiations. We will consult closely with our European partners on the sidelines and, if progress is made, aim to move toward a broader multilateral format with their direct participation.
These ideas continue to evolve, and we welcome thoughtful input. Creating the right structure will be critical to ending this war and transitioning from conflict toward conditions that make possible a durable peace.
This is difficult, detailed work. There are no easy solutions. But the opportunity to help end this devastating war and build a foundation for a more peaceful, secure, and prosperous Europe for generations to come makes it a challenge well worth undertaking.
We will see how these discussions develop and continue working intensively with all parties toward President Trump’s objective of a comprehensive and lasting peace.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Frameworks like the 1975 Helsinki Final Act and 1990 Charter of Paris already cover sovereignty, integrity, consultations and transparency. Russia signed but violated them, including invading Ukraine. NATO is the core architecture.
osce.org/helsinki-final…
osce.org/paris-summit-1…
reuters.com/world/ukraine-…
Bradford Harriman retweeted
Latest Russian internet joke: "Trump's 7th and greatest bankruptcy, the Republican Party!" The goal now must be to prevent America from becoming the 8th.
Dear @WhiteHouse: trump’s name will never be on the Kennedy Center or the Reflecting Pool.
The trump arch will not be built.
And in two years, Congress and the next Administration will erase trump’s name and stench from everything he has touched.
Ozymandias
Bradford Harriman retweeted
WATCH: In a stunning moment, Rep. Jamie Raskin says Democrats are going to take back power from the Executive Branch:
“We have the power to declare war, not Donald Trump. We have got the power to regulate federal buildings. If the president can bulldoze the east wing, he can bulldoze the west wing. It is not his house. It is our house, it belongs to the people, and Congress governs it.”
Bradford Harriman retweeted
Bradford Harriman retweeted
Hakeem Jeffries says Americans don’t want revenge. We want results. WTF?
Let me ask you something, Hakeem.
If a CEO embezzles millions from his employees’ retirement accounts, is prosecuting him an act of revenge? Or is it enforcing the law?
Accountability is not retaliation. Justice is not revenge. And enforcing the Constitution is not political persecution.
Bradford Harriman retweeted
Let's do it. Let's dare him to veto:
— Ending the Iran war
— Canceling $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts
— Restoring ACA Tax Credits
— Raising the federal minimum wage
— Terminating tariffs and issuing refunds to consumers
— Forcing data centers to pay for their own energy and water
— Banning presidential and congressional stock trading
Bradford Harriman retweeted
WATTERS: “How do Republicans — I can’t even believe I’m saying this — win back young men?”
POOL: “I’m not sure they do. And it’s worse than people realize.”
@JesseBWatters & @Timcast don’t even stop to consider they may have played a role in driving the party off the cliff🤷🏼
Bradford Harriman retweeted
Breaking News!
Code UFB!!!
The preliminary global sea-surface temperature for November 4th was more than 7.5 standard deviations above the 1982-2011 mean. In "normal times" the odds of this would be about 33,000,000,000,000-to-1 against.
Next up, 8σ?
Bradford Harriman retweeted
While Ukraine is doing NATO’s only job, alone, Trump is trying to sell out Rutte and the organization to Putin for a few bucks. Pretending this isn’t happening is not an effective way of preventing it from happening. Call things what they are.
Bradford Harriman retweeted
So, let me flag a few things, traitor.
1. "European security architecture" is a phrase the Kremlin uses. We already have one: it's called NATO.
2. You conflate (as you always do) the victim of this war with the aggressor. The aggressor is Russia.
3. "Root causes" is Russian for "do it our way" and you know it.
4. Nothing a word about Russian withdrawal, the occupied territories, POWs or deported children. Weird.
5. Lavrov wrote this for you.
6. Fuck Putin, fuck Russia, and fuck you.
President Trump today advanced an important discussion with several European leaders about the need for a broader European security architecture that can help establish the conditions for lasting peace.
Building on his leadership and the substantive work undertaken this week in Brussels with Ukraine, NATO, and our European partners, @SEPeaceMissions and I wanted to share some of the objectives guiding our ongoing discussions.
For more than 30 years, Europe and Russia have struggled to establish a sustainable security framework. Decades of mistrust, competing security concerns, and the devastating consequences of this war make this an extraordinarily difficult challenge, but one that is essential to lasting peace.
Our objective is to develop practical arrangements that address the security concerns of all sides, reduce the risk of future conflict, and create a more stable and predictable security environment.
We are exploring five principal goals: permanent security consultations, reliable crisis communications, greater military transparency, reciprocal measures to reduce escalation risks, and an enduring framework for long-term European security and stability.
Any arrangements must fully respect the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and independent decision-making of every nation. Each country will retain authority over its own security and alliances, and no country would have a veto over another’s sovereign choices. NATO will remain central to European collective defense, and this initiative would build upon existing institutions and commitments.
We will continue consultations through the Shell Bay format with Ukraine, NATO, the EU, and our European partners, expanding engagement to ensure that all relevant perspectives and ideas are considered. We will also engage Russia as part of the peace negotiations.
Next week in Abu Dhabi, the United States will convene the first trilateral peace discussions with Ukraine and Russia since February. All parties remain intensely engaged in preparing for substantive and productive negotiations. We will consult closely with our European partners on the sidelines and, if progress is made, aim to move toward a broader multilateral format with their direct participation.
These ideas continue to evolve, and we welcome thoughtful input. Creating the right structure will be critical to ending this war and transitioning from conflict toward conditions that make possible a durable peace.
This is difficult, detailed work. There are no easy solutions. But the opportunity to help end this devastating war and build a foundation for a more peaceful, secure, and prosperous Europe for generations to come makes it a challenge well worth undertaking.
We will see how these discussions develop and continue working intensively with all parties toward President Trump’s objective of a comprehensive and lasting peace.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Frameworks like the 1975 Helsinki Final Act and 1990 Charter of Paris already cover sovereignty, integrity, consultations and transparency. Russia signed but violated them, including invading Ukraine. NATO is the core architecture.
osce.org/helsinki-final…
osce.org/paris-summit-1…
reuters.com/world/ukraine-…
Bradford Harriman retweeted
The First Lady welcomes a regime that is murdering civilians, torturing prisoners and assassinating its own dissidents, every day
Replying to @TWOTIMESABITCH
He’s the wrong choice for House speaker. Far too weak.
Bradford Harriman retweeted
Jeffries needs to stop using words like "retribution" and "revenge" when he should be using words like "accountability" and "malfeasance" and "wrongdoing".































