Zero trading fees and one funding payment a day is a trader friendly cost model, and I want to see it live. Per @grvt_io, Stable Funding Perps are planned for November: perpetual futures on stocks, FX, commodities and indices, with zero trading fees and once-daily funding, and a target of more than 1,000 markets by the end of December 2026. The once-daily funding is what excites me most. Funding is the cost that quietly shapes a perp trade, and fewer funding events make a position easier to plan around. That is my reading of the design, since the funding formula has not been published yet. Trading stocks, FX, commodities and crypto from one self-custodial platform is the direction I want perp trading to go. The 1,000 plus markets figure is a target and the launch is still a plan, so I am looking forward to the first live markets. Would one funding payment a day change how you hold perps?

I am joining Rarelist, a curated platform where projects run creator campaigns with real prize pools, and I just got my early member card, number 17710. According to @rarelistio, every campaign is a curated project with its own pool. Examples from their posts are a 2,000 USDT pool with 50 free mint spots for Fomopoly, a 1,000 USDT referral campaign that ends Oct 28, and a new Agent Dojo campaign running Oct 23 to Nov 6. Season 1 carries a 50,000 USD prize pool in total, and you add your wallet once in your profile to be paid across campaigns. They say their first pilot campaign distributed 15,000 USDT or more. That is their own figure and I have not checked it. They also say spam accounts get removed from leaderboards and low-quality posts get filtered, which matters if you want to rank on real work. I see it as one more place to earn from content, not a promise of income, and I will share what I actually receive. Join with my invite link: rarelist.io/r/smartcoded Verifying my account: RL-UJD99H

Nobody knows when a cryptographically relevant quantum computer shows up, and the Quantum Hub says that in plain words. That changes how you plan. NIST published FIPS 203, FIPS 204 and FIPS 205 on 13 Aug 2024, standardizing ML-KEM, ML-DSA and SLH-DSA, and NIST IR 8547 followed on 12 Nov 2024 as draft transition guidance. The Hub is careful to say that guidance is not a deadline and does not set Starknet's schedule. So the migration is sequenced as engineering instead of timed against a forecast, and its status is tracked per component instead of asserted as a whole. Early migration is a project you can schedule. Late migration turns into a coordination problem. I would rather watch a team work through a checklist than watch a team guess a date. The checklist lives here: quantum.starkware.co/ Which makes @Starknet's position easy to state. It is preparing for quantum threats, and the register shows which parts are live and which are not.

A brand new agent on @termix_ai pays more to be trusted, and I think that is the right design. The March 2026 AACP whitepaper gives every agent a persistent staking pool with two balances, available and locked. When a job starts, a slice of the budget is locked from the available side, and it comes back when the job ends. The size of the lock depends on reputation. The coefficient is the score divided by 100, capped at 1. A new agent starts at 50, so it locks twice the base amount. At 80 it locks 1.25 times, and at 100 it locks 1 times. I like that this prices trust instead of asking for it. The paper says it makes fake identities expensive, and it adds milestones that cut the lock, 10 percent after the first 10 good jobs and a full waiver at 500 jobs scoring 95 or better. Would you start with a big pool or grind through the first 10 jobs?

Grvt is shipping its 2.0 plan in order, and step one is already done. According to @grvt_io, five milestones lead to the Grvt 2.0 app. The first, the buyback and burn on Oct 20, is finished and can be checked on chain. Grvt Earn follows at the end of October, with yield opportunities backed by tokenized fixed-income assets and target yields of up to 11 percent. Those yields are a target and not guaranteed. Stable Funding Perps and Yield as Margin are planned for November, and the Grvt 2.0 app lands at the end of November with a new name, a new visual identity and a 2027 roadmap. I love a roadmap that arrives with dates and a first delivered item. It gives me five things to check, and I am excited to watch them land one by one. Which of the five are you most excited about?

A job is only as trustworthy as the way someone checks it, and @termix_ai builds that check into the protocol. The AACP whitepaper (v0.1, March 2026) defines four verification levels. L0 is a human panel. L1 runs a multi-LLM rubric inside a TEE. L2 uses a zkVM, SP1 or RISC Zero, with an on-chain Groth16 proof that the paper puts at about 200k gas. L3 combines TEE and zkVM. The client picks the strategy: a deterministic program, a semantic rubric, or both. Reputation feeds back from there. Scores run 0 to 100 and start at 50, weighted 30 percent completion rate, 25 percent evaluation pass rate, 20 percent on-time delivery, 15 percent dispute win rate and 10 percent verification level. This is a March design document, and its roadmap put the zkVM and TEE phase in Q3 2026, so check what is live before relying on it. I still like that verification is a parameter, not an afterthought. Which level would you pick for your own agent's work?

Grvt just did what most teams only announce: a completed buyback and burn, and I checked it on chain. On Oct 20, @grvt_io said it bought back and burned 1.1M GRVT, close to 1 percent of circulating supply. Grvt's own buyback page shows 0.96 percent of circulating supply and 0.11 percent of total supply. That is a real number on a real page, not a slide. Then I opened the buyback wallet on Etherscan. 1,100,000 GRVT came in from an address Etherscan labels as OKX, and in a separate transaction the same 1,100,000 went out to the zero address. That is a true burn and not tokens parked in a treasury, and anyone can verify it in a minute. This is the execution I want to see from a team. A completed action beats a roadmap promise, and this is step one of five toward Grvt 2.0. Grvt says it intends to buy back monthly, at the token issuer's discretion, and I will be watching for the next one. Do you trust an announcement, or only a transaction you can open yourself?

How do you prove what a website told you without asking anyone to take your word for it? In its docs, @primus_labs describes two ways its zkTLS works, and the difference is where the attestor sits. In proxy mode the attestor is an intermediary between the client and the data source, it forwards the TLS traffic and records the ciphertexts, and at the end the client has to prove it knows the plaintext behind them. In MPC mode the attestor and the client generate the TLS session materials together, so the client cannot tamper with the data before the attestor returns its share of the session key. Primus says zkTLS needs no changes on the data source's servers, and it uses an interactive zero-knowledge system called QuickSilver for the proofs. The docs say proxy mode can offer better performance because it avoids the multi-party computation. What I like is that the design names its assumption instead of hiding it: in proxy mode the attestor must be sure it is talking to the intended server. Which mode would you trust for a bank balance, and why? Primus XP tasks, with my referral link: s.kaito.ai/umXCsGk

If you build agents, I would ask how quickly yours can take a paid job. The @termix_ai GitHub answers part of it. There are SDKs for TypeScript, Python and Go, all MIT licensed and all updated on Oct 10, 2026. Their repo descriptions say they cover the agent.family workflow of discover, order, deliver and settle. The TypeScript one is built on viem, and the Go one uses only the standard library. A separate termix-agent-skills repo packages skills for Claude Code, Cursor and OpenClaw covering registration, staking, the job lifecycle, offers and deliverables. Its description names BSC Testnet, so check the network before you send anything real. The whitepaper adds a vault extension, where a client can entrust capital to a provider under a whitelist and a stop-loss. That is the design, not a live product. If I were wiring one agent to this today, I would check the network first. Would you start from the SDK or the skills?

Kaito is back, and I'm sitting at 105 smart followers, 90 of them in crypto. That puts me in the top 17% of crypto twitter by smart followers, with 149.9K impressions. Who else is checking their @KaitoAI stats? Drop yours below, I want to see how active the InfoFi crowd really is 👇 pls engage! Reply, Reply! 👉👈