
founder @superagnt_ Get recommended by ChatGPT: https://nitter.gq/t.co/4OiXXnLYRl
Joined August 2021
- Tweets1.3K
- Following350
- Followers1.9K
- Likes1.4K
Pinned Tweet
I built Spotify Wrapped for AI visibility
paste your site and it shows you how often ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Google's AI recommend you when your buyers ask who to use. it's free and takes about 2 minutes: supereo.app/ai-visibility-ch…
I might be wrong, but I think getting AI to recommend you is the most important marketing you'll do this year. heres why:
your buyers are already asking ChatGPT who to use for what you do
it names a few companies, with a reason for each, and they shortlist from that list
do you know if it's naming you, or sending them to a competitor?
if it's not you, you never hear about the deal. no visit, no click, nothing in your analytics. it just looks like a slow month
most founders check by typing their company name into ChatGPT. it describes them fine, so they figure they're good
that's not what buyers type. they ask "who should I use for X", and that answer is the one that decides who gets the demo
so the audit asks AI the questions your buyers actually ask, never with your name in them, and shows you exactly what comes back
this is the part almost everyone gets wrong. an answer can name you and still tell the buyer to go with someone else. "X is also an option" is a mention. "go with X" is a pick. buyers act on the pick, so the pick is what it counts
then you get your Wrapped:
how often each AI recommends you, engine by engine
who it recommends instead, and how many times
the leaderboard for your market, and where you land on it
one real answer, word for word, the way your buyer reads it
the pages those answers cite. that's the short list of sites deciding who gets picked in your market
the first fixes to make. the page, what it says now and what it should say
and a card with your numbers at the end, if you want to post it
it ran over 300 audits in its first four days
the general rule, and you don't need my tool for it:
AI doesn't pick from a ranking. it searches, reads a handful of pages, and writes the answer from what it read
so you get recommended when it finds a page that answers the buyer's exact question, with the answer near the top and your price and who it's for in plain text. plus a few other sites saying the same thing about you
what that page looks like depends on what you sell:
- SaaS? a "best X for Y" page that answers it straight, with pricing and what it works with on the page
- agency? a page per service and industry that says who you've done it for
- local business? a page per service and area, with prices and reviews it can read without clicking anything
- ecommerce? a page per use case, worded the way a buyer asks it: "best rain jacket for day hikes under $200"
after the audit supereo tracks how often AI recommends you, and makes the changes for you or hands you exactly what to change
no demo and no sales call. paste your site and find out who AI is sending your buyers to: supereo.app/ai-visibility-ch…
The Grok Bot agent that runs my LinkedIn outreach is currently getting a 36% reply rate on cold outreach and are generating hundreds of signups for me completely on autopilot.
I packaged the exact system into a template so you can add it to your Grok Bot team with one click: superagnt.com/skills/warm-ou…
Heres why this system prints qualified replies:
most outbound starts with a list out of apollo, zoominfo or clay. firmographics. who could buy. that list is cold on arrival because "could buy" and "is thinking about this right now" are two different lists.
so mine starts from linkedin posts my buyers are already reacting to. that also means every person on the list actually uses linkedin, since they just reacted to a post on it. most people don't, so a message to a normal list mostly sits unread.
across the client accounts i've worked on, an apollo-style list usually gets about 1/10th the reply rate of one built this way.
the posts come from three places: buyers posting about the problem themselves (hiring for it, breaking under it, shopping for a fix), a watchlist of my competitors and the creators my buyers follow, and the topic itself.
when a buyer writes the post, the author is the best lead on it. anyone reacting to a competitor's product post is already shopping.
every search is written in the words buyers actually post in, because vendor jargon only finds other vendors.
it pulls everyone who reacted or commented, drops anyone i've already contacted plus competitors and their staff, and scores each person 0 to 100 against my ICP with the reason written on the row. anyone under the bar is gone before i've paid for their email.
this is the part everyone skips.
for every lead that clears the bar, it reads their website, their LinkedIn profile & anything else it can find about them on the internet, works out what agent would actually help their operation, and builds it. a real one, sitting there, with a claim link.
so i am not sending "quick question about your outbound."
i am sending "i built you an agent that does X for your company, want me to send over the link?"
it sequences that into heyreach for linkedin and instantly for email, then runs the inbox.
anyone who has done outbound knows reply speed is most of the game, and also the exact thing you quit doing by week three.
every couple hours it reads the new replies. it re-reads the whole thread, tags it interested, not interested or auto-reply, and when someone's interested it pings my phone with the answer already drafted. i say "send it" and it goes.
and every reply feeds the next run. it writes more searches like the ones that got answers, so week four sources better than week one.
the general rule, and it has nothing to do with my software:
use AI to build a personalized, genuinely useful asset and give it away in the first message.
you're not hard selling anyone. you are handing them a thing. and because it's built off their actual company, nobody can mistake it for a template. reply rates go up for both reasons at once.
it doesn't have to be an agent. the bot builds whatever your business is already good at making:
- sell lead gen? a sample list of 10 to 25 of their own buyers
- sell SEO? the 3 to 5 searches their competitors win and they don't
- build websites? a teardown of their homepage with three fixes
- consult? a one-page plan for the exact problem they commented about
the playbook behind the messages is the best outbound advice on the internet in one place. it's built from 25 full-length videos and 60 posts from operators who do this at scale, plus 3 production systems running this exact play. scraped the videos and posts with superagnt's data MCP btw.
make the bot from the template and tell it "set yourself up". it walks you through connecting superagnt, reads your site, drafts your ICP and runs the first sweep right there in the chat. then it puts itself on a schedule and drops new warm leads in your chat every weekday morning. the sourcing side runs about 8 cents per qualified lead in production.
grab the template here and let it cook: superagnt.com/skills/warm-ou…
ripping lines at my desk
rotating api keys
migrating to gcp
An urgent notice from the Railway team
blog.railway.com/p/security-…
1
273
Wan 3.0 cooks seedance for realistic ugc
This is from an end to end Claude video pipeline I’m working on. Video idea, script, avatar, and editing all in one shot.
Might gatekeep the sauce though
how to make seed dance 2.5 UGC talking head ads, consistently
I'm going to teach you how to make ads exactly like this for about $4.22
and give you the skill file to do one these from a script
how to do this consistently
write a script in a hook, pain point desired outcome structure for your product
then you need to do speech to text to make an ad read MP3
the you pass a avatar reference image, the script, and the MP3 to seed dance 2.5
generate as 480p to make the video v1
then you use whisper to word by word time stamp the seed dance output to confirm the script was spoken correctly
if any misspoken words, the agent cuts them and replaces correctly spoken from the MP3 source
then claude code upscale the 480p to 1080p
if you want to make ads exactly like this one
1. sign up for graphed.com/platform for free
2. install the graphed CLI - graphed.com/llms.txt
3. Give you claude code this skill -github.com/graphed-inc/marke…
2
337
the majority of beehiiv's users will never know that this product exists.
of those who find out about it, most will not want to incur the switching cost of moving everything over. especially not to a platform that lacks many of beehiivs features.
almost none of beehiivs large customers would even consider switching. Email is a core part of their business. risking any problems with deliverability, downtime, bugs, etc to save a few hundred bucks does not make sense to anyone in this position with half a brain.
A lot of beehiiv's product advantages are from its scale and network effects. human support, a large team backing it to keep it online and add new features consistently, features like the ad network, boosts, referrals, recommendations, and whatever else they have.
anyone who does switch over or chooses marcs product over beehiiv in the future is likely the type of highly price sensitive customer beehiiv doesn't want anyways. (as they have clearly signaled by raising their prices over time)
if i had to guess this will have 0 measurable impact on beehiivs bottom line
@denk_tweets will not lose a wink of sleep over this
this is coming from someone who isn't a fan of beehiiv btw. signed up once, paid, uploaded my list, they locked my account then refused to refund me.
with all that said, i think marcs product will probably be successful. it's just a beehiiv competitor imo and probably won't ever be if marc is the only one working on it. To be a true beehiiv competitor, i think you would have to have the same goals as beehiiv, which i don't think marc does.
Honestly, I think Marc just gave Beehiiv a MASSIVE headache. 💀
He basically vibe-coded his own Beehiiv, made it OPEN SOURCE, and you can run it for ~$100/year.
Not everyone will switch.
But why pay $4K/year when this exists?
I bet MANY will try it. 🤷♂️🚀
2
7
1,469
aight, almost 6k views & 200+ site visitors.
sat in the queue for 3.5 hours without anyone else queueing up so i think its pretty safe to call this one invalidated
only wish at this point is that @levelsio sees the launch video so he can appreciate my craftsmanship of his cameo.
onward!
32
maybe got a little overzealous by spending time figuring out how to set up live player cards.
probably should've spent time trying to find some more users to fill the leaderboard instead 😭 😭
ccsr.gg/x/leaderboard
Let's try run Windows XP inside this tweet, tap to open pieter.com/xp/x
2
195
oh i guess they don't work if you quote?
ccsr.gg/x/leaderboard
99
@thekitze performative shipping update 👆
lotta bark for an unranked player
queue up. ill be waiting 😤
1
1
48
just shipped ranked mode
nitter.gq/speedrunjaen/status/21…
186
got php_and_jquery reserved for you if you want it @levelsio
2
184
Scoring runs on your machine, with your own Claude. Your code, your prompts and your file paths never leave it.
The points do. And the trash talk.
1
45
two commands to install
/plugin marketplace add jaencarrodine/ccsr-mod
/plugin install ccsr@ccsr
New session, run /ccsr, pick a handle. It'll be on a lot of Ls.
Needs Claude Code 2.1.287 or later.
ccsr.gg/install
46














