Pinned Tweet
Chlorine dioxide and DMSO - the erased cures.
rumble.com/v2m5ebq-5-america…
rumble.com/vdey7t-the-univer…
midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-r…
midwesterndoctor.com/p/hundr…
Jari Sulkimo retweeted
BREAKING: "THE CEASEFIRE HAS COMMENCED," First Lady Melania Trump announces, confirming the Russia-Ukraine humanitarian truce took effect at 4:00 AM Moscow time—"accelerated two days ahead of schedule" to protect civilians and deliver critical aid.
Trump added that the zone has already "expanded beyond Oleshky, within the Kherson Region, to provide safe passage for the humanitarian convoys."
Jari Sulkimo retweeted
Some Oncologists simply can't handle it because a cancer disappearing with Ivermectin and Mebendazole completely shatters their world view.
It means:
1. They're incompetent
2. Their Oncology Chair is incompetent
3. Their Faculty of Medicine Chair is incompetent
4. Their Cancer Center Director is incompetent
5. Their Oncology Association is incompetent
6. Their entire medical career is a lie
For many Oncologists, it's just too much truth to swallow.
Replying to @MakisMedicine
Conversations with our oncologist
“We don’t understand how your cancer is gone”
“We’re using ivermectin & Mebendozal”
“Your cancer is gone. How?”
“We’re using Iver & Meben”
“It’s weird your cancer is gone. How?”
“We’re using…”
Repast 3x
My conversation last Tuesday ☝️
Jari Sulkimo retweeted
You are a Spiritual(energetic) Being, and your body remembers that fact even when you don’t
Jari Sulkimo retweeted
DMSO is one of the most powerful natural medicines in the world. Widespread, appropriate use of this incredible molecule would wipe out TRILLIONS of dollars in long-term profits of Big Pharma. And that's exactly why you aren't allowed to know this information, and why your doctor has likely never heard of it.
If DMSO was used for strokes and brain injury, millions would be spared from paralysis and death—yet despite thousands studies showing this, the FDA banned it.
Since publishing this article, dozens of readers shared DMSO saved them from a stroke.🧵
midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-…
Jari Sulkimo retweeted
You thought it was for us? No.
In 1946, one year after WWII ended, the US sent the largest force ever to the bottom of the Earth. Nearly five thousand men. Why?
They said it was for training. But what would you need training for in one of the deadliest conditions on the planet? Part of their orders stayed sealed and classified. The expedition came home with little to show, a few men dead, and a story that never quite added up. To this day, nobody can tell you for certain what they were after down there.
Then in 1959, at the worst moment of the Cold War, with the US and the Soviet Union ready to end the world over Berlin, those same enemies sat down and agreed on one thing. Antarctica. No armies. No weapons. No borders. No one allowed to claim it. They locked the whole continent away and agreed on nothing else.
So why? What makes a frozen desert so important that sworn enemies guard it together? Is it because something on the other side scares them more than they scare each other?
Think about the timing. The largest military force ever sent south, in 1946. And 13 years later, the whole continent is locked down. Something happened in those 13 years, and I feel like we weren’t told about it (I know, I’m as shocked as you about the transparency of the government).
But I keep returning to the question: if nothing is truly down there, why is it the one place on Earth they all agreed you can never go?
Jari Sulkimo retweeted
Right now, the most-prescribed Alzheimer's drugs cause brain bleeding or swelling in over a quarter of patients while leaving the disease nearly untouched.
Meanwhile, a neurologist has shown that amyloid may actually be protective. It turns out nearly everything we've been told about Alzheimer's is inaccurate.
And at the same time, proven ways to treat the real cause are being ignored.
The reason you were never told the truth is that the field runs on research now shown to be fraudulent. We waste billions of dollars each year researching the wrong thing.
Here are the treatments they buried:
midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-g…
Jari Sulkimo retweeted
Понадобилась всего 1 минута, чтобы русский вывел из себя именитого британского журналиста
Константин Малофеев, основатель Царьграда, выдал такое, что Пирс Морган просто не смог ничего ответить. Не помогло даже знаменитое британское самообладание. Пришлось поспешно менять тему.
Jari Sulkimo retweeted
WATCH THIS!
HOT MIC MOMENT.
We’re funding this POS and that must end NOW!
Just look at Zelensky’s face, says everything we need to know about this loser we’re supporting.
“Be grateful”! Norway Prime Minister and Finland President appear to be instructing Zelensky before his meeting with Steve Witkoff. They know if he pissed him off, Trump might stop supplying funds and weapons and the last thing they want is to end the war in Ukraine.
Jari Sulkimo retweeted
Charcoal powered motorbike developed in the 1940's. We are all being ripped off from big oil.
Jari Sulkimo retweeted
What Elon Musk just announced is revolutionary. To understand why, you have to go back to July.
In July, Zanny Minton Beddoes, editor-in-chief of The Economist, sat down with Musk. He told her what he's been saying for years: AI and robots will create an age of abundance. Not universal basic income. Universal high income.
She asked the question every economist asks: "Where's the revenue coming from?" If you just issue checks, you get inflation.
At the time, even Musk gave the old answer: the Treasury should issue checks.
This morning, he gave a completely different one. One SpaceX share to every kid in America. The first of many.
Not printed money. Ownership of the value itself. That's the real answer to her question. The revenue comes from where the value is created.
And in the age of AI, where is value created? In private companies. Not in ministries, not in agencies, not in parliaments. The models, the robots, the chips, the energy, the rockets. Almost every productivity explosion of the next twenty years will happen inside companies that build.
Once you understand that, the question of the century changes. It's no longer "will there be abundance?" It's "how do we share it?"
There are only two models.
In the first, the State sits in the middle. It taxes the companies that create value, then redistributes it. Every dollar passes through politicians, agencies, committees, lobbies. It arrives late, it arrives smaller, and it arrives captured. And it's inflationary by nature, because the State injects money without owning any of the production behind it.
In the second, the entrepreneur distributes directly. Those who create the value hand ownership of it to citizens. No intermediary. Your income grows at the speed of the value being created. And deflation stops being your enemy: when AI drives the cost of everything toward zero, you're not holding a fixed check that politicians forgot to index. You own the machine that's driving prices down.
We already know the State is a useless layer. Everything it touches becomes unaffordable: housing, tuition, healthcare. Everything it leaves alone gets cheaper and better every year.
And in the age of superintelligence, that layer becomes even more absurd. Musk believes AI will exceed the intelligence of all humans combined within five years. In that world, what exactly is the function of a bureaucracy whose job is to take from one hand and give to the other, slowly, taking its cut along the way? The State was a slow layer in a slow world. In an exponential world, it's a bottleneck.
QED: Elon Musk is disrupting the State.
Not by fighting it. By making it unnecessary. It's the same playbook he's always run. He didn't lobby NASA to get better, he built SpaceX. He didn't beg carmakers to go electric, he built Tesla. He's not asking the State to redistribute better. He's building the alternative, and letting everyone compare.
In 2008, everyone bet he'd go bankrupt. They bet rockets would never land. They bet electric cars would never sell.
Now they're betting the State is irreplaceable.
Don't bet against Elon.
Two days ago I wrote about a mechanism: everything the state touches becomes unaffordable, and the young people suffering from it blame capitalism instead of the state.
This morning, Elon Musk announced he'll give one SpaceX share to every kid in America. And this is the move that breaks that mechanism completely.
Go back to Mark Perry's chart. At the top, what explodes: housing, tuition, healthcare, childcare. Sectors where the state subsidizes demand and blocks supply. At the bottom, what collapses: TVs, phones, software. Sectors where companies compete to serve you better and cheaper.
Now look at the two models of universal income through that chart.
The state model sends you a check. A check is subsidized demand. And we know exactly what happens when you subsidize demand without freeing supply: prices rise to swallow it. Give everyone $1,000 a month while building permits stay blocked, and landlords capture it within two years. The state check feeds the top of the chart. It's the same mechanism that made tuition explode, applied to an entire economy.
Musk's model gives you ownership. Not a check, a stake in the machine at the bottom of the chart, the deflation machine. When AI and robots drive the cost of almost everything toward zero, you're not waiting for a politician to vote you a raise. You own the thing that's creating the abundance.
But the real checkmate is narrative.
The whole system runs on one story: the capitalist is the villain. The boss, the rich, the multinational. Schools tell it, universities tell it, subsidized culture tells it. Because the system will never name itself as the culprit.
What happens to that story when the richest man in the world puts a piece of his company in the hands of every child in the country?
It collapses. A 12-year-old who owns SpaceX doesn't grow up reading the world as oppressor versus oppressed. He grows up as an owner. He watches his share move when a rocket lands. He understands, in his gut and not from a textbook, that value comes from people who build, not from people who redistribute.
You can't make capital the enemy when capital is in your account. You can't attack a gift to children without exposing what you're really defending: the intermediary. The bureaucrat. The middle layer that lives off the gap between those who create and those who receive.
That's the checkmate. Not an argument. Not a debate. Musk isn't trying to convince this generation that the state is the problem. He's making the state irrelevant, and letting them see it for themselves.
The last generation learned to protest against those who create.
The next one will grow up owning them.

































