> you literally stand for nothing
I stand for getting up and going to the bathroom.
Replying to @Diokekis @leanmaxing
The projection here is strait crazy. You literally stand for nothing. The definition of cattle eating the same plot of grass everyday until you are butchered.
Stand up and get off your knees.
Judge Reyes seen here with Hasan Pikers dog
Judge Ana C. Reyes volunteered to help Biden win in 2020. Biden then appointed her to the federal bench. Before becoming a judge, she donated to Democrats and reportedly gave more than $1,700 to Defeat by Tweet, an organization that raised money off Trump’s posts.
Now she is overseeing a challenge to Trump’s golf course plans backed by Norm Eisen, Democracy Defenders Fund, Democracy Forward and Lowell & Associates. Her political history deserves scrutiny, especially when her courtroom behavior is already the subject of formal objections.
DOJ accused Reyes of belittling government attorneys, prejudging issues and hauling officials into testimony without adequate preparation. In a separate 2025 misconduct complaint, DOJ quoted her asking an attorney what Jesus would say about excluding transgender people from homeless shelters. She also staged a hypothetical ban on University of Virginia law graduates, directing counsel to sit down to make her point.
Her activism stretches back decades. Dolores Huerta’s letter supporting her nomination describes Reyes organizing rallies and marches against California’s ban on affirmative-action preferences and joining the Feminist Majority Foundation’s board in 2014.
This is a substantial record of partisan involvement followed by courtroom conduct that invites serious questions about impartiality. Americans are entitled to scrutinize whether a judge with that history can put her politics aside when ruling on the administration she previously spent money opposing.
Spreadsheeticus retweeted
I used to reply “would” to pictures of hot women implying I would find the idea of sex with them agreeable. As my confidence increased I started to reply “will”. Now I’ve reached a level of self actualization where I simply reply “am”.
Spreadsheeticus retweeted
What if instead of epinephrine it was called pepinephrine because it peps you up.
Idk why this kind of stuff occurs to me. It might be a genetic flaw.
Do you ever have those really difficult questions in your mind like-
How many monkeys are jumping on the bed after all of the monkeys are done jumping on the bed?
This guy wouldn’t have done shit- boomers are absolute faggots.
Replying to @NotARobot004 @body_cops
I like how pussies project their own pussiness by saying “you wouldn’t do shit”. No, YOU wouldn’t have done shit. I’m comfortable with violence.
Bookmarking this because I have long lost the patience to explain this to brainwashed idiots, and certainly not to the level of quality that this person has.
Replying to @ChuckieFFS
You absolute midwit. Congrats on repeating the Wikipedia "Nazis were far-right, end of story" summary you absorbed between TikToks.
Yes, the Nazis crushed independent unions, jailed and murdered communists and social democrats, and Hitler liquidated the Strasserite "left" wing of his own party in the Night of the Long Knives. That part is not in dispute. They were not Marxist class-struggle socialists. They hated Bolshevism as a Jewish plot and treated international socialism as the main enemy. Fine.
What your middle-school history class skipped is that they still ran a National *Socialist* state: private property existed only as long as it served the Führer’s racial and war goals, wages and prices were controlled, industry was cartelized under state direction, profit was subordinated to the party, and the economy was planned for autarky and rearmament. That is not free-market capitalism, liberal conservatism, or classical right-wing economics. It is the same family of state-directed, anti-liberal, collectivist economics practiced by every other fascist and "national socialist" regime. The name was not a prank; the 25-point program and the early rhetoric were full of anti-capitalist planks precisely because they were competing with the actual socialists for working-class support.
Your North Korea comparison is the usual gotcha and it is only half-clever. Yes, names can lie. But the NSDAP did not merely call itself socialist while secretly running a Rothschild hedge fund. They nationalized, directed, rationed, and regimented. The difference from Soviet socialism was mainly that the Nazis kept the owners as managers under party orders instead of shooting them all and installing commissars. Both systems produced shortages, secret police, and mass graves; one just had better uniforms and Wagner.
Elon pointing out the obvious—that "National Socialist" is not an ironic branding exercise and that the regime was economically left of any classical liberal or conservative—does not make him a moron. It makes him less obedient to the post-1945 academic consensus that insists every totalitarian who isn’t a full Marxist must be filed under "far-right" so the left never has to share the body count. Money didn’t buy him a brain; it just bought him a platform where he doesn’t have to pretend your selective reading of 1930s Germany is the complete picture.
Keep yelling "far-right fascists" while ignoring the actual economic policies and the party’s own name. It is the historical equivalent of covering your ears and shouting.

















