Sriram Natarajan retweeted
So, basically, 500 million Europeans expect 300 million Americans to protect them from 120 million Russians who can’t even defeat 40 million Ukrainians while those 500 million Europeans don’t even realize they are being conquered by 2 billion Muslims who claim they are being persecuted by 8 million Israelis. Is that about right?
1
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
I don't have time to mindlessly scroll through my social feeds, so I automated the job of summarizing posts to #OpenClaw & #GrokBot
OpenClaw setup took 40+ minutes.
Grok Bot returned the feed in 10 minutes!
I wrote my experience in here - blog.rememberloop.com/p/my-f…. .
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
I've listened to every episode of the @tferriss show.
And some of my favorites are when Tim interviews prolific writers, diving into their creative process to improve his own.
If you are looking to build a writing habit, these 10 episodes are a must-listen:
✍🏼🎧👇🏼
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
A CEO from one of our portfolio companies shared this with their team. I’m re-sharing it with their permission, because it resonated and reflects what all founders and CEOs should be communicating.
--
We are living through a period of compounding change. And in moments like this, the biggest risk is no longer making the wrong decision. It is moving too slowly while the world moves around you.
There are two paths. We can play defense:
- Protect what we have
- Optimize what works
- Wait for clarity
It feels safe. It isn’t.
Or we can play offense:
- Learn faster than the environment changes
- Use new tools to solve old problems in better ways
- And create entirely new strategies and businesses
That’s where the opportunity is.
Challenge yourself to do things faster and better than you have ever attempted. Stay uncomfortable. Stay on the front foot.
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
Replying to @hnshah
tbh thats the point tho. if using a command line tool feels like "work" you probably shouldnt be the one specifying what engineers build
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
If you're wondering why Alysa Liu and her father Arthur faced targeted espionage and recruitment drives by the CCP on American soil, I can explain:
It stems from the CCP's ethno-nationalist philosophy that views all people of Chinese descent - regardless of citizenship or generations removed - as part of the "Chinese nation" (中华民族 - zhonghua minzu), bound by blood and heritage.
This "once Chinese, always Chinese" mindset equates ethnic identity with loyalty to the party-state. It's why special vitriol is reserved for those with Chinese heritage who are critical about the CCP (like me and many others).
Under Xi Jinping, this has only intensified: overseas Chinese are seen as key to the "great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation" tasked with "telling China's story well," integrating into host societies to advance Beijing's geopolitical goals, and serving as "grassroots ambassadors."
The Chinese authorities hoped Alysa Liu would follow the path of Eileen Gu, who was successfully recruited to compete for China and has since fulfilled her role in "telling China's story well" - amplifying Beijing's preferred narrative on the global stage through her athletic achievements, high profile presence and dutiful avoidance of saying anything negative about China.
The tactics used to co-opt the diaspora include:
> incentives / networks (offered to both Eileen & Alysa)
> monitoring and control (used on Alysa & her dad)
> coercion (used on Alysa's dad)
In Alysa's case, she was subjected to surveillance and espionage not only because she refused to join Team China, but also because her father, Arthur Liu, was a Tiananmen-era dissident who fled to the United States.
The CCP goes to great lengths to surveil and intimidate Chinese dissidents living abroad. Alysa Liu's qualification for the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics heightened the sensitivity of the situation as the Party sought to ensure that her and her father remain silent on political matters and human rights abuses while in China.
Ultimately, the regime sees them, despite being Americans, as assets and extensions of the Chinese nation who must align with its interests.
This is strikingly analogous to the Islamic concept of the ummah - a transnational community united by a profound shared identity that transcends national borders. In Islam, the ummah represents the global fellowship of believers, bound by faith, mutual solidarity, and a sense of collective brotherhood. It often fosters a loyalty to the broader Muslim community that can supersede - or at least rival - allegiance to any single state.
While both concepts inspire deep transnational cohesion, the ummah arises organically from religious teachings and remains largely decentralized (though often weaponized by imams or government leaders for political goals) whereas the CCP's framework is state-directed, instrumental, and backed by organized mechanisms of influence and control.
Liberal societies need to understand this is how the CCP operates.
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
Met a founder who left his job at Netflix and Facebook to return to India and build a company that helps seniors here stay healthy. Why? Because there are 150 million people over the age of 60 in India and most of them are experiencing chronic health issues. While everyone is chasing Millennials and Gen Z, he chose to solve for our parents.
Btw, he's is making money, profitable and growing crazy. All without any ads or marketing. This is the kind of entrepreneurship we need more in India and should celebrate. Don’t worry about visa or AI taking your job. Solve for real problems and the opportunities in India are far bigger than you'd imagined.
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
Ancient tech wisdom says a failed live demo is a good omen for a killer product 🧘
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
Live demos on stage are always a gamble, but I'd much rather watch someone try and fail than suffer through some slick, prerecorded snooze fest. It's having something on the line that makes it worth watching!
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
I disagreed with Charlie Kirk on just about everything. But, we shared an opposition to "gender identity" and the abolition of sex.
He once had me on his show to discuss it. He was polite, outgoing, and funny.
During the interview, I said something about the "TQIA." He exclaimed, "I don't know what any of that means!" I said, "Don't worry, nobody does."
He and his entire audience laughed.
I am not a Republican, and I am certainly not MAGA. But I am grieving his death in part because he was a human being, in part because he leaves behind a wife and two children, and in part because of what this says about American society.
I will not take any part in any political violence, and I will stand with anyone, wherever they stand on the political spectrum, who will denounce it.
I hope America can recover from this.
#RIP
EDIT: I will block anyone who comes on here to glorify violence.
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
RIP Charlie Kirk. It doesn’t matter what your opinion is of Charlie or his politics if you don’t view this as one of the darkest days in American history than you are part of the problem.
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
Trump: I’ll release the Epstein files because Americans care.
America: Yes we do! Yay!
Bondi: Wait until you see what we’ve got on Epstein!
America: Yay! We care about Epstein!
Bondi: *releases nothing useful*
America: ?????
Trump: Why do you care about Epstein?
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
BREAKING: A federal judge in San Francisco has just ordered Israel to rebuild Iran's nuclear facilities.
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
Trump is paying illegal immigrants $1000 to self-deport.
And the way the media is covering this reveals exactly how media spin distorts your reality.
Sriram Natarajan retweeted
Replying to @DOGE
So let me get this straight, our government was handing out trillions with fewer checks than a Chuck E. Cheese arcade, and we’re just now fixing that? How is this not the biggest story in the country?
























