Blogs on child protection law and social work stuff. @Suesspicious@mastodon.green
Joined February 2012
- Tweets33.8K
- Following5.6K
- Followers6.5K
- Likes16.4K
suesspicious minds retweeted
One million people have now watched the Thorne Travel advert I posted, but nobody mentions the disappointing sequel.
Santa’s sleigh breaks down. Cue staff in pyjamas and rollers to save Christmas…
suesspicious minds retweeted
Everyone's talking about the John Lewis advert. But it’s nothing compared to this masterpiece from Thorne Travel.
Power-walking travel agents. A flash mob. Pumping house music. And unofficial Disney characters.
Every time you think they’ve run out of ideas, another one arrives.
suesspicious minds retweeted
BOSS: Have you sorted the competition prize money? £12,000 isn’t it?
ME [CLEARLY WEARING A BRAND NEW £76 BANDANA]: Yeh something like that
suesspicious minds retweeted
Wow! I don't know whether to be surprised or scared! 😂
A woman in China checked her security camera after leaving for work.
She saw her cat humming a little tune and dragging its own bed outside to sunbathe!
As if it had been waiting for this moment all along! 😂❤️ nitter.gq/PicCrow/status/2117290…
suesspicious minds retweeted
CPS puts another fictitious case before High Court zurl.co/jA0kh
suesspicious minds retweeted
Family President issues guidance on management of short notice applications in public family law proceedings: localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/…
suesspicious minds retweeted
Panda's reaction to the caretaker taking a piece of sweet potato from its tray
suesspicious minds retweeted
what's really, really funny about this is that they studied this exact thing in monkeys before & TLDR the monkeys would in fact put their top monkeys on a magazine cover & even surrender their own bananas to see him.
🍌🦧 oo ooo EEE ee 🦍
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
suesspicious minds retweeted
What people think cross examination sounds like:
P: you plunged the dagger into him, didn’t you?
D: I did. I did. I confess. I killed him.
What it actually sounds like:
P: turn to page 208 in your bundle; the last WhatsApp message dated 12.05.2009 please.
D: which page, sorry?
suesspicious minds retweeted
“This version … is more likely to withstand cross-examination because…”
Family Court expert found to have left AI response in report(!)
HHJ Flexman cites “significant gap between the voice and opinion of the expert and the report which she has filed”
bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ…
suesspicious minds retweeted
Bemused this is his own barrister saying this?
I suppose it could be to get in before the prosecution can, or perhaps the lawyer feels if he’s fulfilled his brief competently, he’s not too concerned what happens with his client?
