
🔞// Haikyuu🧡| pfp done by @darlingdaichi ^-^ | JJK | FRUBA | mxtx | 26 years old🌌
she/her
Joined December 2020
- Tweets10.2K
- Following406
- Followers177
- Likes105K
lia ♡ retweeted
[WIP] had to research armpits for this one...#nanami
lia ♡ retweeted
itafushi vampire au except it’s basically “vampires will never hurt you” by mcr and also megumi is a priest
38-year-old Palestinian journalist Mohammed Al-Najjar has been killed by an Israeli strike.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) reports that, as of September 24, 2026, Israel is responsible for the deaths of 241 journalists and media workers since October 7, 2023.
i genuinely need people to not make this about hq!!. this is an actual person with real feelings putting a lot on the line to share this, qrts joking “i wanna know who he ships in hq!!” “oikawa would so do this” are weird. give support and kindness to this real actual guy
lia ♡ retweeted
He DIDN'T lose. Read past the clickbait image.
The court dismissed Tsuda's request to delete the TikTok videos because they had already been deleted, BUT stated that a performer's voice IS PROTECTED by publicity rights.
This is a WIN for actors in Japan.
Kenjiro Tsuda's AI Voice lawsuit has reportedly been dismissed ✍️
The Jujutsu Kaisen and Yu-Gi-Oh! voice actor sued TikTok over more than 180 videos that allegedly used AI to imitate his distinctive voice without permission.
The Tokyo District Court dismissed the case after TikTok and the user involved had already removed the account and videos, meaning there was no longer content for the court to order removed.
However, the ruling also addressed an important issue, recognizing that a person’s voice can be protected as a personal symbol under publicity rights.
That makes Tsuda’s case significant beyond the outcome itself.
As AI becomes increasingly capable of recreating familiar voices, the question of who has the right to use those voices is only becoming more important.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The image claims Tsuda "lost his case," but the Tokyo District Court dismissed the removal demand only because the videos/account were already deleted and ruled that voices are protected under publicity rights like images—the first such ruling in Japan.
japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/09/3…
asia.nikkei.com/spotlight/soci…
automaton-media.com/en/news/voice-…
invenglobal.com/articles/26662…









































