Entering any single punctuation mark into the search field shows me these accounts, dunno what it's sorted by but hell yeah.
K. C. Rybski 🔅 retweeted
this may be my last tweet before shit goes parabolic. i’m not an ai researcher whistleblower. i work for none of the biggest labs in the world.
there is currently a major bloom happening across humanity. they are hiding this from the public.
we are on the verge of an era of abundance, superintelligence, cure for cancer & so much more.
prepare for the best.
K. C. Rybski 🔅 retweeted
Science is not some hobby that serves the self actualization of people in a publicly sponsored job placement program. It is the systematic search for truth.
K. C. Rybski 🔅 retweeted
AI makes the world fairer in one specific way: good ideas from places nobody looks at can become real without permission from the places everybody looks at
K. C. Rybski 🔅 retweeted
Put AI in my blood. Replace my neurons one by one. No brakes. Writing and arithmetic were detours through grain and cattle accounting. We can now speak to intelligence itself and build worlds through conversation. Humanity returns to oral tradition, with the universe talking back
“While the act of creation is inherently satisfying, there’s a danger: one might find satisfaction in the labor itself and mistakenly believe that a high-quality piece of work has been created,” he said.
very insightful comment from miyamoto
Nintendo’s Shigeru Miyamoto, the acclaimed designer behind Super Mario and Zelda, has explained why he believes generative AI won’t make human creativity obsolete.
"There will always be a role left for us to play."
videogameschronicle.com/news…
K. C. Rybski 🔅 retweeted
schools spent years banning phones. now they're banning AI. kids keep learning faster than the rules.
K. C. Rybski 🔅 retweeted
Replying to @mossyrainforest
noooo my creativity is magic
"I'm original, I'm original, I'm original" I continue to insist as I slowly shrink into a corn cob
K. C. Rybski 🔅 retweeted
When I was in college and got interested in physicalism, I noticed quickly that it was actually surprisingly difficult to talk about it in either left wing or right wing spaces. Right wing people would say I was spiritually messed up for believing it, left wing people would say it was "western" or whatever. It gets a little exhausting talking to grown adults who talk like this about philosophy. Even today, a lot of grown adults on this site will behave like children if you express the belief that minds could be reducible to physics. They won't engage in the pretty strong arguments at all, just imply that it's ridiculous to ever believe that the mind isn't magic.
This put me on the market for places I could go to have the actual implications of relatively simple compelling ideas like this taken seriously. One of the main functions of effective altruism as a cluster of ideas for me has been to be a place where I could actually just think through and read about these ideas freely as actually having specific implications for the world, instead of just collecting them as social passwords for my political tribe. Relatively simple debates like "Machines could be intelligent in our lifetimes, what does that actually mean?" get completely swamped by similar reactions where people don't actually think about the premises or logic at all, they just look at the conclusion and decide "nope, doesn't fit my deal" and find ways around it. There are a lot of dangers of new social games and blindspots for any new ideological scene, but I think it's an underrated story just how much EA has been one of the only places I could have actual conversations with content about pretty straightforward popular ideas in analytic philosophy and what they mean for the world.
K. C. Rybski 🔅 retweeted
I hate communism in the same way I hate fascism so I'm broadly in favor of using the CIA to end it. Sorry to the commies but you guys gotta lose.
K. C. Rybski 🔅 retweeted
“Explain the double-slit experiment.”
MWI.
“Explain why anesthesia selectively blocks consciousness through quantum forces. Explain spatiotemporal binding in the brain without quantum interactions. Explain consciousness using strictly classical mechanisms.”
It's not as though Hameroff is offering the kind of explanation of consciousness using quantum mechanics that he's demanding from his critics.
This is typical of how people handle their pet theories: the competing theory must explain everything in deep, mechanistic detail, while the pet theory gets to wave its hands and say something like, “Quantum mechanics is somehow involved,” and that's about it.
Then, merely discovering that anesthesia selectively blocks consciousness somehow becomes “evidence for” his explanation. All without having to actually offer one.
K. C. Rybski 🔅 retweeted
The world is excessively awful. I do not understand people who want to keep all of this more or less the same.
this is just a migraine
Scientists have gave us one of the most detailed looks inside a human cell we have ever had.
Via: Gaël McGill & Evan Ingersoll
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This is a 3D digital rendering of a eukaryotic cell by Gaël McGill and Evan Ingersoll created 2009-2015 as an educational visualization using molecular data, not a real photograph or direct scientific observation.
gaelmcgill.artstation.com/projects/Pm0JL1
newsweek.com/fact-check-vir…
mymodernmet.com/eukaryotic-cel…


































