Sara

Targeted Individuals, please feel free to copy and edit this exhibit for your own case. EXHIBIT | Researcher Misconduct Series: Injunctive Relief Classification: Electromagnetics and Set Points Control Systems Prepared for: Evidentiary Record / Injunctive Relief Proceedings Prepared by: Kimberly C. Tanner Date: May 23, 2026 ELECTROMAGNETICS AND SET POINTS CONTROL SYSTEMS IN USE Statement of Claimant I, Kimberly C. Tanner, submit this exhibit to document ongoing concerns involving electromagnetics and set point control systems as they relate to bodily autonomy, cognitive liberty, and non consent. Claimant alleges she is a Neurotech Trauma Survivor and that she has been subjected to ongoing, repeated, non consensual interference affecting bodily and cognitive function. This exhibit is submitted as part of the evidentiary record to document concerns regarding electromagnetics, externally influenced physiological set points, and interference with internal biological regulation. Bodily autonomy and cognitive liberty are violated every day through the continued use of electromagnetics and set point manipulation. The use of these systems is highly invasive when electromagnetic effects are experienced in vivo, particularly where physiological states appear externally influenced, altered, maintained, or overridden without consent. The claimant’s concern includes both: 1. Set points imposed external to the anatomy where a physiological or neurological target state appears established outside the body and then acts upon internal bodily function. 2. Set points manipulated within the anatomy where internal physiological thresholds, biological responses, or neurological states appear adjusted, overridden, shifted, or maintained without voluntary initiation by the subject. These reported effects are experienced as violations of bodily sovereignty, physiological integrity, and internal self regulation. Technical Framing From a systems and control perspective, a set point refers to a target condition a biological or engineered system attempts to maintain or adjust through feedback. The claimant alleges that current medical and scientific descriptions of physiological “state” and biological “response” do not fully account for circumstances in which the source of the signal and the point of control are external to the subject. In this framework, both the origin of the signal input and the resulting physiological condition may be separate from the subject’s own endogenous regulation. Further, the claimant alleges that the reported reaction is not entirely accurate when characterized solely as the body’s natural physiological response for two reasons. First The source of the signal is alleged to be external to the subject. The claimant alleges that the initiating signal, triggering input, or control source does not originate from her own anatomy or nervous system. Accordingly, any resulting state change should not be presumed to arise exclusively from native physiology. Second The set point itself is alleged to be externally influenced or manipulated. The claimant further alleges that the target physiological condition may itself be externally adjusted, imposed, maintained, or overridden. Under this condition, the body’s observable output may reflect adaptation to an externally influenced control state instead of ordinary internal regulation. Because of these two distinctions, the claimant asserts that the resulting physiological condition should not be understood solely as a spontaneous or naturally occurring bodily reaction. Instead, the observed output may reflect the interaction between: • the subject’s endogenous physiology and • an alleged external signal source coupled with externally influenced set point control acting upon that physiology For evidentiary purposes, the claimant distinguishes between the following: Endogenous Physiological State The body’s internal baseline generated through native neurological and biological regulation. Externally Influenced or Externally Adjusted State A condition in which signal input, control pressure, or the target physiological state is alleged to originate outside the subject and act upon internal biological function. Under this allegation, the physiological set points involved are separate from the claimant’s biological origin and separate from voluntary self regulation. The claimant alleges external influence over the following physiological and neurological states: • wakefulness and sleep state • responsiveness threshold • pain threshold • muscle activation and motor readiness • autonomic regulation • internal sensory threshold • visual processing • speech related output • cognitive load and attentional state • general nervous system activation (dual-response - endogenous and exogenous) This distinction is central to the claimant’s reporting as a Neurotech Trauma Survivor, aka Targeted Individual, and forms a material basis of this exhibit. Rights Implicated The conduct alleged herein implicates the following fundamental rights: Bodily Autonomy The right to maintain exclusive authority over one’s own body without external interference, manipulation, or physiological override. Cognitive Liberty The right to freedom of thought, internal speech autonomy, uninterrupted cognition, and mental privacy. Physiological Integrity The right to maintain independent neurological and bodily regulation free from unwanted modulation or externalized biological control. Right of Refusal Claimant expressly does not consent to: • any form of interfacing • neural acquisition • physiological monitoring • electrophysiological manipulation • neuromodulation • stimulation • electromagnetic exposure intended to alter bodily or neurological function • biological state regulation by external means • externalized set point manipulation affecting anatomy, cognition, or physiology Evidentiary Relevance This exhibit is submitted because the repeated experience of electromagnetics coupled with externally influenced state changes raises significant concern regarding: • interference with normal bodily regulation • disruption of internal physiological equilibrium • alteration of baseline functional states • interference with sensory and neurological processing • compromise of bodily autonomy and cognitive liberty • intrusion into internal biological processes without consent This exhibit preserves those concerns as part of the claimant’s ongoing evidentiary record. Relief Requested Claimant respectfully requests: 1. Immediate cessation Immediate cessation of any non consensual interaction involving electromagnetics, stimulation, or physiological set point control systems affecting her anatomy or neurological function. 2. Preservation of evidence Preservation of all relevant records including but not limited to: • device logs • telemetry • stimulation records • software records • access logs • communications • physiological monitoring data • neural data • research records • third party transfer records Claimant requests these records be subpoenaed before an judge in Division Court in the United States of America. 3. Identification Identification of any person, institution, contractor, laboratory, platform, vendor, or entity involved in the acquisition, interpretation, modulation, adjustment, or manipulation of claimant linked physiological or neurological data. 4. Protection of rights Immediate protection of claimant’s bodily autonomy, cognitive liberty, physiological integrity, and right of refusal. Closing Statement The use of electromagnetics and externally influenced set point control systems against human anatomy without consent constitutes an extraordinary intrusion into the most private aspects of human existence. Where physiological state, neurological output, or internal bodily regulation is externally influenced, altered, maintained, or overridden without permission, the intrusion extends beyond ordinary privacy concerns and directly implicates bodily sovereignty, mental freedom, and human autonomy. This exhibit is submitted to preserve the record of those concerns and to formally assert claimant’s continuing and unequivocal non consent. Submitted by: Kimberly C. Tanner Date: May 23, 2026