Aniket retweeted
My entire college span was during the Congress era in the 2000s’ & it was an amazing time all throughout.
Our only worry was to have fun, complete the attendance & get decent marks.
Genuine friendships existed irrespective of the religion which are still intact btw✊❤️
When I look back, I genuinely miss that time. Seems like a long gone era but golden period of my life.
north or east, the story is the same ecerywhere.
CDP roads, which remain on paper, are a major cause of traffic chaos.
Allowing apartment complexes & commercial establishments based on proposed CDP roads, only to stall road works later, will worsen traffic congestion
@CMofKarnataka @osd_cmkarnataka @krishnabgowda @GBA_office @GBAChiefComm @ICCCBengaluru
Aniket retweeted
In 2011, then Gujarat Chief Minister Thiru @narendramodi avl said that if his hands were not tied, he would have gone to Delhi and waged war against the central government. Thiru Narendra Modi avl made this statement in response to the police crackdown on the peaceful anti-corruption campaign led at Ramlila Maidan, Delhi. In my opinion, what the Hon PM said then was absolutely right, and there is nothing wrong about it.
Today, you could be jailed indefinitely; your surety bonds could be rejected; and, surprisingly, a Special Executive Magistrate will play circles around you when he/ she is empowered to deal with preventive bond cases.
If you question the violation of due process of law in a democracy, you would be called names, and a barrage of attacks would follow, including being labelled a Foreign Agent.
Ever since I asked the Central Government to speak with the protestors during the NEET exam protests, I have faced constant attacks, but I let them pass because I felt it was important to focus on the issues on the ground in Tamil Nadu. I also, in a way, enjoyed this as it would quickly remove the tag of me being a BJP B Team and sent to TN as a Dhurandhar 😍
Yesterday during a press meeting, I questioned the Delhi Police’s methods of detaining protestors of CJP.
Since yesterday, the attacks have resumed, as expected. For some in the BJP, let me make this categorically clear, in case you have selective amnesia: I left the BJP on June 5, 2026.
As I mentioned yesterday, I might not agree with the tactics of the CJP, and I think many of theirs are misguided. But if you ask me whether they have a right to oppose/argue/protest on an issue that they think is important?
I would categorically say - YES.
So, I would like people to ask the questions again, even if it makes some of them uncomfortable, and I wish the Central Government would answer them instead of resorting to whataboutism.
1.How was Jantar Mantar denotified as a protest site as per a standing order of the Ministry of Home Affairs after a letter was handed over by CJP seeking permission to conduct a protest?
2.How long can we have a system that gives powers to an Asst Commissioner of Police as a Special Executive Magistrate who rules over whether to keep someone in preventive detention? The ACP of Delhi Police stands over the trial where Delhi Police is the complainant against the accused CJP. Now you know which way the wind will blow.
3.On October 19th, why did the Special Executive Magistrate, aka ACP of Delhi Police, deliberately arrive late for the bail hearing of those who were arrested from Jantar Mantar on October 13th and recuse himself, saying there is a threat to his life? Is this some kind of a joke?
4.Why were 8 sureties rejected, and why was the person who came for surety subjected to cross-examination by the Special Executive Magistrate?
5. Any action taken on pellet gun usage by the Delhi police or other actions on Delhi police who have violated the standard operating procedures against the protesters during the NEET fiasco stir?
Has no BJP karyakarta in Delhi violated any bond conditions during the previous Congress and AAP governments. I trust the same Delhi police were then also when barricades were jumped and orders disobeyed? How were they dealt with then? Like this?
Definitely - NO.
Now I hear that the detained functionaries of CJP were released by SEM after the case reached the High Court.
I also recently saw a cockroach effigy burned as part of the Dusshera celebrations. Out of curiosity, I tried to find out who is giving this free publicity at a National level. No surprises here. It was led by a BJP MLA, Ashok Goel.
My question again is: is the BJP opposing the CJP or giving it free publicity? Does it want the opposition votes to split by making CJP a bigger player? At this rate, the CJP couldn’t have asked for a better PR team, even if it had paid for one! (1/2)
बीजेपी वो गंगा है जिसमें नहाने से मौत की सजा पाने वाले अपराधियों के पाप भी धुल जाते हैं।
Allahabad High Court suspends conviction of murder convict who wishes to contest election on BJP ticket
barandbench.com/news/allahab…
Aniket retweeted
Why have Indians not been informed about this? Why is the Modi regime keeping the people in the dark?
Aniket retweeted
Replying to @JethmalaniM
subversive mindset of Modi, Advani, Jaitley and more. subversive actions by bjp at the state level.
the end goal is one. ONE PARTY SYSTEM.
इनको कोई ये बताए कि मोदी जी की सरकार ख़ुद खेती नहीं करती है। दूसरे राज्यों के लोग जो मेहनत करते हैं, मोदी जी की सरकार उनकी नसों का ख़ून निचोड़ने तक टैक्स लेती है। वो छीन के बिहार में बंदरबांट करती है वोट के लिए। जिससे ऐसे गुंडों को मुख्यमंत्री बना सके।
Aniket retweeted
The dumbest closeted sanghi argument is "the opposition will make a worse government."
Then vote them out too bhai. That's the whole point of democracy. That's the very right being taken away from us today. Don't use it as an excuse to defend bjp. We can obv see through it.
if they can do both, why do they buy legislators and capture regional parties?
why do they capture EC and now the justice system too.
because they want one party autocracy in India. the truth is so plain except for people who dont see n understand what's coming next.
Aniket retweeted
More evidence, if needed, of what #SIR is really about. Detailed analysis today by @vrsrini and co author in today’s @the_hindu
And no reply from the @ECISVEEP to this.
Aniket retweeted
UP CEO called our report misleading, then confirmed it. We had found that ECI software auto-generated 85,854 forms to delete voters without a reason. He also confirmed attempts at bulk deletion of Muslim voters.
1/4
reporters-collective.in/trc/…
हमारी सरकार घटिया नहीं है बस हमने काम अच्छा नहीं किया।
- निर्मला जी निकट भविष्य में
I was talking to a bhaiya from my society and casually asked him, “Whom do you support?”
He said, “We've seen the Congress era, so we support BJP. Although they haven't done anything remarkable in the last few years, bur we don't have any other strong opposition.
And honestly, that makes a lot of sense.
Sometimes, it's not just about supporting a party; it's also about not having a better opposition.
yeah. so many obcs opt for Jaat surnames in Haryana when they move to cities.
urbanization solves caste.
to a degree.
at its core, the CJP vs BJP is a culture war. At one end, we have GenZ that can't make sense of the real world after going through good pvt schooling.
other is the rustic, uneducated Hindu millenials suffering from seige mentality, who has been appropriated by BJP.@ShekharGupta
brother's brain can't process that cheating and being late are two different things. Cheating is dishonest and reflects on value system that one holds and is never okay.
being late for exams is due to external factors. Why is he putting them together here?
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education has recommended that latecomers to NTA exam centres be allowed to appear after signing an undertaking, without additional time.
At the same time, IIT Bombay has held in abeyance its July 2026 rule that prescribed a one semester academic suspension (along with an FR grade) for possession or use of unauthorised material or devices during examinations, reverting to the milder 2015 procedure in which suspension was primarily for serious or repeat offences.
These decisions arrive shortly after the NEET UG 2026 paper leak cancellation and the tragic suicide of an IIT Bombay student following an alleged malpractice incident.
While limited flexibility for genuine delays may reduce hardship for a few candidates, and while automatic harsh penalties can have unintended consequences, the broader signal is concerning.
Competitive examinations in India already face organised leak networks, biometric failures, and widespread malpractice.
Diluting entry discipline and softening consequences for cheating risks further eroding the credibility of the process that determines access to medical seats, engineering programmes, and other limited opportunities.
Merit and fairness require consistent rules, not repeated second chances that reward tardiness or dishonesty.
The public interest lies in strengthening invigilation, question bank security, and accountability not in normalising exceptions.
Where are we heading if the response to integrity failures is greater leniency rather than firmer safeguards?




























