release the files
hyperspace
Joined March 2009
- Tweets16.6K
- Following8.5K
- Followers9.3K
- Likes35.9K
∞✨ retweeted
if the admin wants people to believe the anthropic decision was made out of genuine security necessity rather than grievance-driven retaliation, high ranking officials could simply stop posting like this
Three months ago, @DeptofWar kicked @AnthropicAI out of our building—forever.
Every passing day proves why that was the right move. 🇺🇸
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This official statement is not accurate or truthful. The DOW didn’t kick out Anthropic “forever.” They invited Anthropic back when they launched the Mythos model — They even continued to use Mythos in high-stakes military ops.
cnbc.com/2026/05/01/pen…
∞✨ retweeted
I am a Web3 Ambassador at World Liberty Financial.
There are 12 of us on the team page. 4 are named Trump. 3 are named Witkoff. The page calls us "the passionate minds shaping the future of finance."
600,000 wallets bought our memecoin. They lost $3.87 billion. The family collected $350 million in trading fees. It launched 3 days before the inauguration. 80% of the supply went to CIC Digital LLC and Fight Fight Fight LLC. I did not choose the names. I designed the allocation, the vesting, the timing, and the distance between the product and the President.
The distance is my best work.
I am the reason these events are unrelated.
World Liberty Financial sends 75 cents of every dollar to DT Marks DEFI LLC. That is the family entity. Zero capital contributed. Zero liability assumed. I wrote this into the Gold Paper. Page 14. The lawyers bound it in white leather. The binding cost more than the due diligence.
Justin Sun invested $75 million. He was facing SEC fraud charges. The SEC dropped the case. He is now our advisor. These events are unrelated.
Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to federal money laundering violations. He received a presidential pardon. The SEC dropped its lawsuit against his exchange the same week we listed our stablecoin. Then the exchange settled a $2 billion deal entirely in that stablecoin. These events are unrelated.
Arthur Hayes, Benjamin Delo, and Samuel Reed of BitMEX pleaded guilty to Bank Secrecy Act violations. All 3 received presidential pardons. Then the company itself was pardoned. $100 million in fines. Gone. An American first. These events are unrelated.
Sheikh Tahnoun of Abu Dhabi paid $500 million for a 49% stake that was never publicly disclosed. Then the administration approved semiconductor exports to his companies over national security objections. These events are unrelated.
Everything is unrelated. I track the unrelatedness on a dashboard I built. The dashboard has 7 columns now. I am proud of the dashboard.
On May 22nd, 220 people paid a combined $148 million to eat dinner with the America First president. Over half were foreign nationals. Justin Sun paid $18.5 million for the first seat. He visited the Executive Office Building the day before. I designed the seating chart. I put it on the Investor Confidence page. That page is doing well.
The team page lists 3 Witkoffs. All 3 are Co-Founders.
Steven Witkoff is the President's Middle East envoy. He testified as a character witness at the President's fraud trial.
His son Zach runs the crypto operation. His son Alex is also a Co-Founder. I have not been told what Alex co-founded.
The father runs the diplomacy. The sons run the platform. The family runs both. That is organizational efficiency.
Barron is 19. His title is Web3 Ambassador. The same as mine. Donald Jr. called the conflicts of interest "complete nonsense." Eric launched a Bitcoin mining company called American Bitcoin. America First. The mining partner is Hut 8. Hut 8 was founded in Canada. America First means the name.
On March 6th, the President signed Executive Order 14233 creating a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The order directs the government to hold Bitcoin. The President's family holds billions in Bitcoin. The executive order appreciates the President's assets by presidential decree. I did not write the executive order. I made sure it looked unrelated to the portfolio.
Trump Media put $2 billion of Bitcoin on its balance sheet. The ticker symbol is DJT. His initials. The press secretary said it is absurd to insinuate the President profits off the presidency. Forbes calculated his crypto holdings exceed the combined value of Mar-a-Lago and Trump Tower. I would call that absurd too. That is my job.
600,000 wallets bought in. 1 of them asked why she could not withdraw her funds. I told her the protocol was experiencing dynamic market conditions. She asked what that meant. I sent her the Gold Paper. She said she had read the Gold Paper. I muted her channel. Dynamic means the conditions change. The condition that changed was her access.
A congressman called us the world's most corrupt crypto startup operation. We put it on a coffee mug. Ironic merchandise. $45. The revenue split on the mug is also 75/25.
My own tokens vest on a different schedule. I wrote that schedule. That is not in the Gold Paper.
The memecoin funds the family. The family funds the platform. The platform funds the stablecoin. The stablecoin funds the deals. The deals require the pardons. The pardons free the partners. The partners fund the platform. The President signs the executive orders. The executive orders inflate the assets. The assets fund the family.
I am the reason these events are unrelated.
∞✨ retweeted
A statement on the comments from Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.
anthropic.com/news/statement…
∞✨ retweeted
It’s extremely good that Anthropic has not backed down, and it’s siginficant that OpenAI has taken a similar stance.
In the future, there will be much more challenging situations of this nature, and it will be critical for the relevant leaders to rise up to the occasion, for fierce competitors to put their differences aside. Good to see that happen today.
∞✨ retweeted
Sent this message to a bunch of college friends with varying exposure to AI:
I've had a big shift in my perspective on AI over the past two years that I've mostly neglected to communicate to people, partially because it's been happening slowly in the background. I used to think that it was pretty plausible we'd hit a wall this decade with respect to some fundamental capability, but this has slowly been getting less likely to me as AI progress has continued, and now this seems very unlikely to me (<5%).
Previous technologies have never fully substituted for human labor—they've always been complementary. The fundamental reason for this is that previous technologies haven't been intelligent agents—they're merely tools that require intelligent agents to use them. I thought for many years that this could still turn out to be the case with the current paradigm of AI, but there's just been too much progress, and it's happening too rapidly, for this to seem plausible anymore.
What does this change in perspective mean concretely? I'm now quite confident that within the next 2-30 years, the economy and civilization will look totally, radically different from how it's operated for the past 2500 years. I still have a lot of uncertainty about what exactly this will look like—whether it'll be utopic, dystopic, maybe somewhere in between, or maybe we'll all be dead. But I feel very confident now that it's going to be totally insane and chaotic (like, many orders of magnitude more chaotic than anything the world has experienced in our lifetimes, like way way more significant than Covid, to pick a recent example).
I don't have a really concrete goal with sending this except that you're my best friends and it feels important for me to say my true beliefs to y'all. I guess I don't want you to be caught off guard. There are maybe two concrete takeaways/pieces of advice I feel comfortable giving: try to develop strong wellsprings of meaning and purpose from things outside of work (I think most of us are fine on this point), and start thinking about political actions you could take that feel true to you, that could plausibly help us muddle through the transition.
∞✨ retweeted
This has been said a thousand times before, but allow me to add my own voice: the era of humans writing code is over. Disturbing for those of us who identify as SWEs, but no less true. That's not to say SWEs don't have work to do, but writing syntax directly is not it.
∞✨ retweeted
As someone who works in cancer research and spent significant portion of his life dedicated to this, I support Sam’s point. The “spend less on entertainment, cure cancer” take sounds simple and feels good. It is also wrong.
The notion that you should devote all AI power to cancer or medical research is a false dichotomy that is not compatible with human reality and is not even as helpful as people assume. You could make that argument about any entertainment, sports, or games: why waste hundreds of billions on these when you could spend all of that on cancer research (currently less than $10 billion a year from the U.S. government, and being cut further). Yet they feel entitled to make these simplistic popular criticisms.
Scientific progress, especially in biomedicine, not only needs AI and massive data centers; it also needs sustained R&D, actual expensive experiments, very robust datasets, faster trials, fewer regulations, and better incentives for such investments. We still have to solve these bottlenecks and invest tremendous amounts of money and resources. Pools of capital are not a single bucket. Consumer spend does not map cleanly to the NIH, biotech, or trials.
It is therefore unfair to attack OpenAI, which is in fact doing much more for the progress of science than most frontier labs, with the exception of Google, which is also devoting huge resources toward these goals. I do wonder how much of their time and money these people who are making these criticism have given to cancer research? Do they ask this to themselves evet time they spend any time and money for entertainment? Why waste it on that instead of donating to cancer research?
It is also important to remember that without fun games, we would not have NVIDIA and current AI. Why? Because games drove GPUs. GPUs powered AI. AI now accelerates drug discovery. The line from “entertainment” to cures is not straightforward. In fact, I have started making educational science videos using Sora 2. I can already see how powerful this will be for training people or get them interested in science, because it’s fun and seeing is understanding. I would not be surprised if one of these AI videos leads to an insight that results in a cure.
Life, education, and research need to be fun, at least while humans are in charge. We need this to sustain our motivation to learn and produce.
Now I will spend some time making a few more Sora 2 videos and will not feel guilty that I did not spend that time finding a cure for cancer. I also know that in science you have to remix unexpected things to arrive at the most creative ideas.
i get the vibe here, but...
we do mostly need the capital for build AI that can do science, and for sure we are focused on AGI with almost all of our research effort.
it is also nice to show people cool new tech/products along the way, make them smile, and hopefully make some money given all that compute need.
when we launched chatgpt there was a lot of "who needs this and where is AGI".
reality is nuanced when it comes to optimal trajectories for a company.
∞✨ retweeted
Some people today are discouraging others from learning programming on the grounds AI will automate it. This advice will be seen as some of the worst career advice ever given. I disagree with the Turing Award and Nobel prize winner who wrote, “It is far more likely that the programming occupation will become extinct [...] than that it will become all-powerful. More and more, computers will program themselves.” Statements discouraging people from learning to code are harmful!
In the 1960s, when programming moved from punchcards (where a programmer had to laboriously make holes in physical cards to write code character by character) to keyboards with terminals, programming became easier. And that made it a better time than before to begin programming. Yet it was in this era that Nobel laureate Herb Simon wrote the words quoted in the first paragraph. Today’s arguments not to learn to code continue to echo his comment.
As coding becomes easier, more people should code, not fewer!
Over the past few decades, as programming has moved from assembly language to higher-level languages like C, from desktop to cloud, from raw text editors to IDEs to AI assisted coding where sometimes one barely even looks at the generated code (which some coders recently started to call vibe coding), it is getting easier with each step.
I wrote previously that I see tech-savvy people coordinating AI tools to move toward being 10x professionals — individuals who have 10 times the impact of the average person in their field. I am increasingly convinced that the best way for many people to accomplish this is not to be just consumers of AI applications, but to learn enough coding to use AI-assisted coding tools effectively.
One question I’m asked most often is what someone should do who is worried about job displacement by AI. My answer is: Learn about AI and take control of it, because one of the most important skills in the future will be the ability to tell a computer exactly what you want, so it can do that for you. Coding (or getting AI to code for you) is a great way to do that.
When I was working on the course Generative AI for Everyone and needed to generate AI artwork for the background images, I worked with a collaborator who had studied art history and knew the language of art. He prompted Midjourney with terminology based on the historical style, palette, artist inspiration and so on — using the language of art — to get the result he wanted. I didn’t know this language, and my paltry attempts at prompting could not deliver as effective a result.
Similarly, scientists, analysts, marketers, recruiters, and people of a wide range of professions who understand the language of software through their knowledge of coding can tell an LLM or an AI-enabled IDE what they want much more precisely, and get much better results. As these tools are continuing to make coding easier, this is the best time yet to learn to code, to learn the language of software, and learn to make computers do exactly what you want them to do.
[Original text: deeplearning.ai/the-batch/is… ]
∞✨ retweeted
Weekend project: "Deep FREEsearch"
Me and @cursor_ai wrote a naive implementation of OpenAI's Deep Research. Using🔥Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking 🧠 from @GoogleDeepMind. 100% free to use, just bring your own API keys.
∞✨ retweeted
🎄🎉 For AI developers, Christmas just came early! We're slashing prices on our most popular models at Deep Infra—running on H100 cards in the US:
💥 Llama 8B Turbo (fp8) - $0.02/$0.05
💥 Llama 8B (fp16) - $0.03/$0.05
💥 Llama 70B Turbo (fp8) - $0.13/$0.40
💥 Llama 70B (fp16) - $0.23/$0.40
Always the lowest prices, always! 🚀 #AI #DeepInfra #MachineLearning #AIinference #Llama #H100
∞✨ retweeted
If you haven't decided yet who to vote for, here's why I think you should vote for Harris.
∞✨ retweeted
NotebookLM updates (since people are loving it):
- You can now share Audio Overview via a public URL, accessible to everyone by default
- Support added for YouTube videos and audio files as new source materials
Enjoy : )
blog.google/technology/ai/no…
∞✨ retweeted
Kayak cross in the Olympics for the first time and it is must-watch CHAOS from start to finish! 💥 #ParisOlympics
∞✨ retweeted
Introducing Claude 3.5 Sonnet—our most intelligent model yet.
This is the first release in our 3.5 model family.
Sonnet now outperforms competitor models on key evaluations, at twice the speed of Claude 3 Opus and one-fifth the cost.
Try it for free: claude.ai
ALT Benchmark table showing Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforming (as indicated by green highlights) other AI models on graduate level reasoning, code, multilingual math, reasoning over text, and more evaluations. Models compared include Claude 3 Opus, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Llama-400b.
∞✨ retweeted
🤯🤯🤯 @MongoDB team just dropped a blog post on @crewAIInc!
Great example of supercharging investment analysis with MongoDB + crewAI 🔥🔥🔥 Eager to try a few ideas I got from this!
Retweet please? 🙏
mongodb.com/developer/produc…
∞✨ retweeted
Pretty wild seeing the Apple math demo basically recreated with Gemini 1.5 flash API in just hours. Tldraw team is cracked. $goog
