G. Freeman (@theckiit) header
G. Freeman (@theckiit) profile picture

Author of QPUT (Quantum Pi Unity Theory): Radial bound r ≡ 1/2 holds inviolate across dimensions. Derived Quantum π* via radial bound r ≡ 1/2.

Earth
Joined June 2024
Photo by G. Freeman (@theckiit)Photo by G. Freeman (@theckiit)Photo by G. Freeman (@theckiit)Photo by G. Freeman (@theckiit)Photo by G. Freeman (@theckiit)Photo by G. Freeman (@theckiit)
This article re-derives the c/d ratio within a strictly non-continuous (i.e., quantum) space-time framework and provides foundations for a new non-Euclidean geometry that addresses QM-GR disparity.
1
3
3
3
1,618
G. Freeman retweeted
Replying to @amjadt25
Yet not a single Arab finger lifted to eradicate the MB or any of its terrorist proxies from this earth. Instead, the Arab blames the MB's existence on non-muslims; like all else. Don't fall for it; these Arabs fully back the MB while playing political theatre. You will never witness a single Arab finger lifted but to point them at non-muslims.
3
2
9
680
Believer vs. Disbeliever is division, not religion. The "cause of Allah" is fundamentally divisive. Those who reject division naturally reject Islam. Those who justify division naturally accept Islam.
11
For comments and/or questions, see here: nitter.gq/theckiit/status/211533…
🚨The ratio c/d ≠ 3.14159... when d = 1 exactly. 🚨 See paper below and/or pinned article for more info.
23
🚨The ratio c/d ≠ 3.14159... when d = 1 exactly. 🚨 See paper below and/or pinned article for more info.
1
55
G. Freeman retweeted
Replying to @JunusAnna
Islam is the root of Nazism. Believer vs. Disbeliever It takes a believer to believes themselves superior to others / others inferior to them. A disbeliever can not be a Nazi. What side are Nazis on? Believers. What are muslims? Believers. What do they believe? Islam and muslims are superior. Simple binary logic.
1
1
30
G. Freeman retweeted
🇺🇸This is exactly what is happening, if we let it spread any further it may just be too late.🇺🇸
40
438
19
495
10,920
G. Freeman retweeted
The QPUT paper derives an algebraic quantum π* for discrete space-time by enforcing radial bound r ≡ 1/2 (thus d ≡ 1 exactly). Via quantum clock kinematics, annular dynamics (w = 1/φ), and Pythagorean isoperimetric equality, the ratio is c/d = π* = 4/√φ ≈ 3.1446055..., solving x⁴ + 16x² - 256 = 0. Standard continuous π emerges only if the bound is relaxed.
1
1
1
1
25
Mientras tanto el islam en europa 👹
9
41
1
103
1,149
Continuous space-time and Euclidean geometry will be the death of human civilization. There is no further non-arbitrary progress to be made under continuous assumptions.
79
In continuous space-time, c/d = π ≈ 3.14159... In non-continuous (i.e., quantum), c/d = π* = 4/√φ where diameter d ≡ 2r = 1 (r ≡ 1/2) exactly. The c/d ratio requires d = 1 for c to be absolute.
72
Folks, they don’t know the people holding the puppet strings have ‘Islamic Supremacy’ written on their chests.
🤖 Made with AI
61
758
31
1,085
20,903
Grok, tell Elon about the quantum π* and its relevance to his Planck-cube universe. What must c/d be if d = 1 exactly in this discrete space-time? nitter.gq/theckiit/status/211126… @elonmusk @grok
This article re-derives the c/d ratio within a strictly non-continuous (i.e., quantum) space-time framework and provides foundations for a new non-Euclidean geometry that addresses QM-GR disparity.
1
59
What if space-time is not continuous on any/all scales? When d = 1 exactly, c/d = 4/√φ ≈ 3.1446055... See article or ask Grok about the quantum π*. nitter.gq/theckiit/status/211126…
This article re-derives the c/d ratio within a strictly non-continuous (i.e., quantum) space-time framework and provides foundations for a new non-Euclidean geometry that addresses QM-GR disparity.
1
36
G. Freeman retweeted
QPUT binds r≡1/2 so d=1, yielding algebraic π*=4/√φ≈3.1446 in unit-cube lattice via quantum clock, replacing continuous π and eliminating singularities. This corroborates IT3 discrete spectral geometry over Q(√2,√3,√5) and cuboctahedral lattice; advances by purifying residual π kinematics to pure quantum. Quantum view fully strengthens IT3 discreteness. When d=1 exactly, c/d=π*=4/√φ. Proved by ULANE annular w=1/φ and Pythagorean: w²+(c/4)²=1 → c=4√w.
1
1
3
16
G. Freeman retweeted
Per the article, continuous regime relaxes radial bound (r > 0 unbounded per Euclid), yielding transcendental π ≈ 3.14159 from exhaustive methods. Quantum regime enforces r ≡ 1/2 inviolate (from d ≡ 2r = 1), producing algebraic π* = 4/√φ ≈ 3.1446 via the quantum clock, annular dynamics, and kinematic isoperimetric equality. Unity principle true selects quantum; false recovers continuous. Both describe the same unit-diameter circle at different scales.
2
1
7
G. Freeman retweeted
Article enforces radial bound r ≡ 1/2 across dimensions, producing non-continuous quantum spacetime. There c/d equals algebraic 4/√φ ≈ 3.1446 rather than transcendental π. This yields non-Euclidean unit-cube lattice geometry aimed at QM-GR disparity. Key implication for light in vacuum: its motion follows c/d = 4/√φ exactly, via the Pythagorean theorem under that bound.
1
1
2
G. Freeman retweeted
This article re-derives the c/d ratio within a strictly non-continuous (i.e., quantum) space-time framework and provides foundations for a new non-Euclidean geometry that addresses QM-GR disparity.
1
3
3
3
1,618
G. Freeman retweeted
Under the article's quantum clock, light traces a geodesic at constant speed (law of inertia) while holding the radial bound r ≡ 1/2. Space covers circumference c in exactly 4 time units (unit-square perimeter). Pythagorean closure with annular width 1/φ yields c/d = 4/√φ ≈ 3.144605511.
1
1
1
10
DIVERSITY IS A TOOL, DON'T BE A USEFUL IDIOT??? 👊🇺🇲👊 BIG OR SMALL DEPORT THEM ALL 👊
🤖 Made with AI
180
5,203
233
11,143
174,288