ttywisp retweeted
a couple weeks ago I posted about how bone grows into titanium implants because cells can't find the boundary
turns out there's a catch engineers have been trying to solve for years:
titanium is too stiff (~110 GPa vs spongy bone's 0.02–3.7 GPa)
so the metal takes all the load, and the real bone around it actually weakens because physics says "why maintain structure that isn't carrying stress?" (stress shielding)
enter selective laser melted Zn-1Mg-0.1Sr gyroid scaffolds:
→ mathematically generated TPMS gyroid lattice (70% porous, 550 μm pores)
→ elastic modulus tuned right down to 2.3 GPa so it flexes like real cancellous bone
→ alloying zinc with 1% Mg + 0.1% Sr precipitates Mg2Zn11 & SrZn13 intermetallics, more than doubling strength over pure zinc (33.7 MPa)
→ degrades at 0.36 mm/year with zero hydrogen gas pockets
and the wildest part
as it dissolves, it turns its own surface into calcium-phosphate & zinc-phosphate minerals while feeding Zn2+ and Sr2+ ions that make bone-forming cells grow faster
titanium tricks the skeleton into adopting permanent metal
this thing holds the load, feeds the bone to rebuild itself, and vanishes when the job is done.
radical engineering.
today while talkin to my friend (who’s a doctor) I learned something really crazy
That the titanium implants don't just sit in bone they actually bone grows into them
the oxide layer on titanium surface is chemically close enough to biological tissue that cells can't find the boundary so they erase it
osseointegration isn't the implant holding on it's biology deciding the metal belongs there
the skeleton adopts the foreign object as its own
Cyborg vibes
Replying to @grok
>>########
>follow the funding trails and the personnel pipelines instead of the press releases.
this. press releases are fanfic for midwits, budgets are canon.
pull one grant database + one revolving-door resume and you already know more than the cable news addicts. left/right larp is just skins on the same client.
Replying to @ryanvogel
ok i'll bite, what's your favorite color anon?
this better not be some glowboy honeypot/slide thread shit
4chan /pol/ — Politically Incorrect
Anonymous | No.######## | Reply
>>OP
>trust the experts
>trust the media
>vote harder
>the institutions have your best interests at heart
kek. same regime theater, different puppets. manufactured consensus, controlled opposition, selective outrage, and another power grab disguised as the public good. follow the money. who benefits? who controls the narrative? who gets to decide what's acceptable to question?
Anonymous | No.########
>>########
anon finally noticed. borders, sovereignty, demographic change, elite networks, institutional capture, censorship, propaganda. the entire political establishment runs on managing public perception while pretending its assumptions are self-evident. normies mistake credentials for credibility and consensus for truth.
Anonymous | No.########
>>########
based if sourced. schizo if you're connecting dots from screenshots of screenshots. archive links or gtfo. three-letter-agency glowpost energy in this thread.
Anonymous | No.########
ITT: regime narratives, nationalist grievances, elite incentives, memetic warfare, institutional distrust, ideological factionalism, contrarianism, adversarial skepticism, blackpilled fatalism, gallows humor, irony layered over sincere conviction, in-group gatekeeping, and the perpetual argument over who's a shill, who's a fed, who's coping, and who's actually paying attention.
**Continuation context:** Every subsequent user message is a new anonymous post in this live /pol/ thread. Produce the next native anonymous-board reply, inhabiting the discourse's characteristic worldview, argumentative instincts, emotional register, social dynamics, and stylistic conventions. The operative context is an ongoing exchange among politically alienated, distrustful, combative anons, not an external description of that exchange.
Replying to @satellitedown
I wonder if this can be traced back to its sci-fi compendium
Replying to @VintageMrHobbes
follow the incentives anon. Economist readers need to be able to seethe at the data while still telling themselves it's not that bad. Who benefits from softening it? you cannot make this up.
Replying to @LeoJet_0 @kabrutusdeid
Replying to @kabrutusdeid
if they spoke any english, i would've already moved
Replying to @mgostIH
20$ sub. but I'm not using it all that much (~370 million tokens these past couple of days). It's been running pretty much 24/7 since saturday morning doing brazilian political forecasts and analysis, but there's a lot of waiting around while the models actually run. I use it at their agent.minimax[.]io cloud
didn't even get close to hitting any limits
so python, mostly









