AI Training, AI Transformation, and Organizational Intelligence
Joined May 2008
- Tweets4.4K
- Following474
- Followers2.5K
- Likes663
Pinned Tweet
Since late last year, we've been heads-down: working with clients, pushing AI to its limits, and building a platform.
Now it's official. Universal Mind is back as The Organizational Intelligence Company.
Same enterprise discipline. New mission.
#EnterpriseAI #AITransformation
🤖 Made with AI
Zweig Group reports that 89 percent of AEC firms name principals and owners as primarily responsible for business development. The same report puts their share of the effort at 12 percent. Project managers carry 59.
So the people in the room for the go/no-go call are often not the people the last pursuit taught.
Who sat in your last debrief, and were they in the room for the next call?
#AEC
32
Three things your AI dashboard can't see.
The heavy user doing low-value work. Top of the leaderboard, reformatting things faster. Genuinely faster, genuinely low value.
The light user who changed something real. One query a day, an afternoon saved every week. Their number is small. Their outcome is the biggest on the floor.
The quiet non-users, and why. Some don't need it. Some got a confidently wrong answer and stopped. Some were never told what they're allowed to put in it. The dashboard shows all three as the same zero.
Which of the three is hiding in your numbers?
1
1
27
Switching AI vendors isn't like switching a software tool. It's closer to switching infrastructure.
Every prompt your team tuned for one model gets retested and often rewritten. Every document indexed for one provider's search gets indexed again, and the search checked again. And that work lands on your best people, not your newest.
A better, cheaper model for your work ships tomorrow. How long until your team is using it?
If the answer is a ticket that says "evaluate," you're locked in, and your vendor knows it before you do.
What happened the last time a better model shipped?
#AIStrategy
1
23
"We used to get maybe 10 responses to an RFI or RFP. Now, we're getting 500 because everybody puts it in a chatbot and sends it to us."
That's Anil Chaudhry, a senior advisor at the US Department of Transportation, onstage in October, as FedScoop reported. One official, on federal procurement in general, not engineering selection.
But when every firm's proposal reads well, a well-written proposal proves less.
What does your next one prove that a chatbot couldn't write?
37
Saying no to a pursuit now feels like throwing work away. The AI draft was done by Friday.
So the call gets made in a short meeting, on what a few people remember: why the firm lost this client last time, what that pursuit cost, whether the engineer named on page four is free in March.
Who made the call on your last one?
#BusinessDevelopment
ALT Card with the headline "The firm says yes. Nobody actually decided." over a photo of a bright concrete corridor with two frosted-glass meeting-room doors: the threshold of one glows green, the floor before the other is worn from use. Universal Mind, The Organizational Intelligence Company, in the footer.
1
16
Firm leaders in Phoenix asked how to make AI work, how to compete differently and how it helps with the talent gap.
The question we'd put on top: how does the firm benefit?
Answer that and the rest of the list gets easier. Skip it and you're buying tools for individuals and hoping the firm catches up.
What's your firm's answer?
23
Your AI vendor would like to train your people. For free.
Take it. The material is genuinely good. Just be clear about what it is: training built to increase usage of that vendor's product.
Here's the test. If your company switched primary AI vendors next quarter, what percentage of your team's training would still be worth anything?
#AITraining
1
41
The full post: universalmind.com/thoughts/c…
2
Do we just deploy an LLM chatbot and let individuals figure it out?
Engineering firm leaders asked that in Phoenix. Our answer is no. Chatbots handed out one person at a time create more silos, because what each one learns stays with that person.
A competitor can buy the same chatbot. They can't buy your firm's intelligence, or the way you do business.
How many private assistants is your firm running?
#AISilos
15
Ask any company six months into an AI program who's good at it. They can name them.
Leadership reads that list as adoption. It's the opposite. If AI only works for a few people, you didn't transform. You created an elite.
Hard requests route to those names, and a queue forms behind them. When one of them leaves, what they knew leaves too.
Who on your team has a queue behind them?
#AILeadership
The full post: universalmind.com/thoughts/y…
3
On a panel in Phoenix, the CEO of a large engineering firm said, more or less, that if they could afford it, they'd be more interested in hiring data scientists than more principal engineers.
Chad Sanderson, our CxO, was in the room and felt it shift.
Hiring a principal engineer bets on what one person knows. Hiring a data scientist bets on what the whole firm knows, and that bet only pays if the firm has made what it knows usable.
Has your firm done that work?
#EngineeringLeadership
ALT A senior firm leader seated alone at a long dark boardroom table at night, looking out at a city skyline. Headline: A bet on one person, or a bet on the firm?
1
51
Gartner's George Brocklehurst, to the publication CIO, on what a system learns from your operation: "If it accrues to the vendor's shared models, your operational experience is improving a product your competitors also use."
He was describing enterprise software. We'd ask the same of every agent your people have connected to a work account; that extension is our reading, not his.
What your firm teaches an agent lands somewhere. Is it somewhere your firm owns?
#VendorLockIn
26
In the Engineering Management Institute and ActionsProve's 2026 survey of more than 300 AEC professionals, 88% said they use AI at work. 21% said they use it daily.
The report's own line: "Not a single survey respondent who uses AI less than daily reports transformational productivity gains."
The 21% built a habit. The rest have a tool they remember sometimes. Neither number tells you what the firm kept from any of them.
#AIAdoption
ALT Long-exposure photograph of a highway work zone at dusk, traffic and plant blurred into light streaks around a finished concrete structure standing sharp and still. The headline reads: Faster people. Same firm. A band along the foot reads Universal Mind, The Organizational Intelligence Company.
Every agent you run works the night shift, in your systems, with real credentials, and by design nobody is watching. That's the selling point, and it's the risk.
The design got approved once. What it does on any given night doesn't get approved at all.
So, at your next leadership meeting: who is accountable for what each agent does? Not its output. Its actions: what it touched, changed, sent, installed.
One name per agent. Could your firm produce that list today?
#AIAgents
28