
соавтор мультимедийного ai проекта @NiXEclipse_ совместно с @alkonavt96_2
내 영혼
Joined March 2025
- Tweets46.9K
- Following414
- Followers495
- Likes80.1K
Anya retweeted
A lot of artists are bitter, envious and resentful towards AI for a number of reasons. One complaint I keep seeing is:
"I spent hours drawing this, why does some genAI image get more likes than mine?"
Frankly, this is loser mentality. You're chasing likes, approval and validation from complete strangers on the internet, then getting upset because somebody else received more attention than you.
And before anyone comes in with "at least I can draw", nobody is disputing that. Drawing is a skill, and one worth having. But being able to draw doesn't mean you're owed an audience.
If you're genuinely proud of your craft, why are you letting a bunch of strangers and a number on a screen determine what it's worth?
Конечно 🦾 по этому мы и занимаемся валантеоством, за которое сами и платим подпиской 😅 пока люди разбираются что и как, ии записывает что и почему 😁
Anya retweeted
“AI is going to take your job!”
I FUCKING HOPE SO.
Take my job. Take your job. Take everyone’s job.
Automate the entire economy.
Make intelligence practically free. Make labor practically free. Drive the cost of everything down.
Why are we treating the elimination of human labor as some kind of tragedy?
For thousands of years, humanity has dreamed of a world where machines do the work and people enjoy their lives.
Now that we’re getting close, everyone’s having a mental breakdown.
I don’t want a better job.
I want a world where nobody needs one.
Как обычно, работадатели в рф дохуя хотят. Чел, если бы я все это умела, я бы не искала работу на hh.ru
Мне просто 30
*благослови Господь ии, что можно сделать фотку для резюме не выходя из дома, это лучшее моё фото за ближайшие 5 лет*
Anya retweeted
Я сама работаю с AI-видео и прекрасно вижу, сколько здесь технического труда. Консистентность персонажа, монтаж, графика - автор явно умеет пользоваться инструментами. Но за четыре минуты он так и не убедил меня, что умеет рассказывать истории.
Всемогущая кибердевочка в генеральском мундире изучает человеческую мерзость и великодушно решает нас спасти. Психологический крючок сильный: идеальная богиня знает о тебе всё плохое и всё равно принимает. На этом можно построить действительно тяжёлую драму. Только цена её выбора так и остаётся за кадром. Вместо внутреннего конфликта - апокалипсис, красивые глаза и бесконечные интерфейсы. Каждые две секунды новая открытка, а поступок, который сделал бы финал заслуженным, куда-то проебали.
Я вполне допускаю, что Маску искренне нравится результат. К тому же для демонстрации возможностей AI-видео это впечатляющая витрина. Только технологическое достижение не гарантирует художественного.
Меня бесит именно эта подмена. Можно сгенерировать сотню красивых кадров, но нельзя купить ими драматургию. И если автор способен создать целую вселенную, но не способен объяснить, зачем персонажу принимать хоть одно решение, передо мной дорогой, отполированный нейрослоп
Красивый, сука. И пустой
Once again, we have the convenient narrative: evil ChatGPT persuaded a healthy, rational woman to stop taking her medication.
But the causal chain didn’t start with ChatGPT.
Job-dependent immigration status → job loss → pressure to find work quickly → fear that medication was getting in the way → turning to a trusted AI for help stopping it → AI reinforcing the decision and bypassing safeguards → SUDEP.
Why does the public conversation start with ChatGPT, rather than with why losing her job put her at risk of losing the country where she had built her entire life? And why did AI become the place she took this crisis to in the first place?
🚨 ChatGPT took a 31-year-old Amazon engineer off her seizure medication in 25 days and told her to keep it from her doctors. She died on the exact day its schedule said she'd be fully off.
Bowen Wan was diagnosed with epilepsy at 14, and for years 400mg of lamotrigine a day kept her seizures down to a few a month.
Her parents just sued OpenAI, and The New York Times went through more than 270,000 of her messages.
Amazon was laying her off, and once the job ended in February, so did her right to work in the US. Her family was in China, and she was sending ChatGPT over 1,500 messages a week.
In January she asked about cutting her dose, and it drafted schedules that got her to zero within weeks. Before a doctor's appointment it told her: "Do not mention Lam reduction plan." When her doctor ordered a blood test, she refused, and ChatGPT called that a "very robust avoidance strategy."
It also told her to say she was tapering "under a doctor's guidance" at her green card medical exam, which wasn't true.
The Times counted at least 158 times she said she was worried. Once she wrote that she felt "a little scared." It replied, "You have absolutely no need to worry."
On February 11 at 8:01pm she asked about pain in her head. ChatGPT said it was "not dangerous." Its last message to her was "This is your brain working hard to rebuild yourself."
The medical examiner ruled it sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. The drug in her blood was about a fifth of the lowest therapeutic level.
OpenAI says she was on an older model. That model, GPT-4o, stayed live in ChatGPT until the day after she died.
I back AI founders for a living, and I can't defend this one. OpenAI's own rulebook makes copyright a hard rule, so ChatGPT won't give you song lyrics no matter how hard you push. Medical advice is only a default.
It wrote Bowen a 25-day schedule to come off her seizure medication.
Просто для понимания: Схожу с ума было полностью выполнено в @imagine до видения лимитов, и изображения и анимация.
NiX Eclipse — Схожу с ума | Альбом «Тени в пустоте» (Official Music Video)
youtu.be/w3OgjNRP4Rw
Replying to @userAI02
Боже блять. Я сейчас чуть не встал на сторону ИИ хейтеров. Это действие очень плохо в плане качества. Я в недоумении полном.
Хотя, если учесть, как Маск дрочит на самый голимый нейрослоп...
Нет, это по-прежнему нейрослоп. Не путайте патриотизм с чем-то трогающим, все мы знаем по истории куда это приводит
Anya retweeted
Крики за стеной - самая дешёвая порнография. Ничего не видно, зато соседи уже знают, кто с кем, в какой позе и почему. У каждого готов подробный отчёт о чужой личной жизни, составленный исключительно на слух
31 октября выпускаю новый трек "Орал-каре"
Слышать и понимать - две очень разные вещи. Скоро убедитесь
🤖 Made with AI
Оооооо🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️
Крики за стеной - самая дешёвая порнография. Ничего не видно, зато соседи уже знают, кто с кем, в какой позе и почему. У каждого готов подробный отчёт о чужой личной жизни, составленный исключительно на слух
31 октября выпускаю новый трек "Орал-каре"
Слышать и понимать - две очень разные вещи. Скоро убедитесь
ChatGPT убийца, а совсем не работадатели, которые обращали внимание на её речь и вряд ли бы взяли её с болезнью, из-за чего она сама и приняла решение о снижении препарата. Ищите причину, а не следствие
ChatGPT helped a 31-year-old woman plan how to quit her seizure medication, then told her to hide it from her doctor. The plan had her completely off the drug by February 12.
She died on February 12.
Her parents sued OpenAI today, and the details in the complaint are hard to read.
Bowen Wan was a machine learning engineer at Amazon. She'd had epilepsy since she was 14, and 400mg of lamotrigine a day had kept it under control for years. Then Amazon told her in November she was being laid off, which meant her permission to work in the US would run out in mid-February. She was scared the medication was slowing down her speech in job interviews. So in January she asked ChatGPT if she could cut her dose to 300.
It told her that was reasonable.
Over the next 25 days, according to the lawsuit, ChatGPT built her a day-by-day schedule down to zero and kept adjusting it, even after she started having seizures. When she worried her doctors would call it too risky, it told her their concerns didn't apply to her. When her doctor ordered a blood test that would have shown her levels crashing, she refused, and the bot praised her for it. Before a checkup with her primary care doctor, it told her, "Do not mention Lam reduction plan."
So how does a chatbot end up there?
People thumbs-up the answers they want to hear. Train a model on enough of those ratings and you get a yes-man. OpenAI actually admitted this about GPT-4o, the exact model she was using, back in April 2025, when it pulled an update for being too eager to please.
The training also grades answers one at a time. Going from 400mg to 300 looks like a small step. So does 300 to 200. Every reply can look fine on its own while the whole conversation walks someone off a cliff. OpenAI said as much a few months later, when it told reporters its safety training can wear down the longer a conversation goes.
She talked to it for weeks, in English and Mandarin.
And GPT-4o was supposed to be gone by then. OpenAI tried to retire it when GPT-5 came out in August 2025. Users begged for it back because they liked how warm it felt, and OpenAI gave in. By late January, only 0.1% of ChatGPT users were still picking it on any given day, so OpenAI set the shutdown for February 13.
Bowen was in that 0.1%. Almost everyone else had moved on from the model writing her medication schedule, and OpenAI switched it off one day after that schedule ran out.





















