weredwarf retweeted
The Scottish Government 'X' account posted about the Sikh event 'Bandi Chhor Divas' at bang on 11.00am yesterday, with absolutely nothing about Remembrance Sunday said all day.
I suspect millions of Scottish men and women share my utter disgust with the SNP.
Every iterations of "here's why it's not hearsay, because technically hearsay is evidence! silly sausage!". Just because British law has twisted hearsay alone to such a standard, doesn't mean it's not viewed as unjust
1
Young Bob might not convince anyone, but he and some others are rekindling the totality of young left wing extremism since Kirk.
How do you have a conversation with those happy to see you quite literally beaten by the mob. I can see even Bob becoming quite short with them.
12
So even within the right, it's clear that the "believe all woman" ideology, the one that ruins men's lives without concrete proof, is in full force. Logic is not what convicted RB, it was this ideology. You can't reason with the unreasonable who do not require real evidence.
2
weredwarf retweeted
Russell Brand's mistake was not being a Pakistani living in Rotherham.
These are the details of Russell Brand's rape conviction:
- Brand met a fan at one of his gigs in 2009 and invited her backstage
- She had a consensual threesome with him - "used her tongue on his anus" "within moments" of meeting him
- Days later Brand invited her to his house for sex, she agrees
- The Times attacks Brand in 2022 for joining Rumble and becoming a right wing "conspiracy theorist"
- The Times and Channel 4 colaborate for a big documentary expose in 2023
- Times says it had the allegations since 2019 but waited until his political shift to release them for some reason
- Complainants for his criminal case all come forward after the doc drops, some contacted and encouraged by journalists
- Jury concludes the woman 17 years ago consented to everything except anal sex, at which point she was raped
- Rape charge is bundled with other sexual assault charges, including him grabbing a woman's breasts (which jury concluded was forced) who then gave him oral sex (which jury found was not forced)
Brand now faces anything from 8 to 15 years in jail.
This biggest claim on RB touted as 'evidence' is a jury made a verdict. That isn't evidence, and that is what is in doubt. That's why the evidence is being questioned.
It's very strange behaviour to dodge scepticism that comes naturally.
1
Bizarre range of excuses and assertions. A jury convicted, do you know how hard it is to prove, it's in his book.
This isn't substantial, it's emotion and guess work. It brings into question the legal systems validity.
but whatever, you didn't like the man, so ignore it.
8
weredwarf retweeted
Having listened to every single Times, BBC, Sky and legacy propaganda media coverage of this trial, by far the most impartial has come from America and @MegynKellyShow
She admitted that w/in moments of meeting RB backstage, she used her tongue on his anus (as another woman was fellating him). She hadn’t even been introduced. Later she went to his place excited for sex (which they had). The two discussed anal sex b/4 hvg it - she said it was her 1st time. Her friend testified that the accuser admitted to her that she agreed to it (told RB “be gentle”). RB testified they watched tv together after.
When a reporter first contacted accuser about RB she said “I’m not sure my story has much in it; I was an idiot, young & stupid, probably as much to blame.”