NEW: Former MIT biomedical researcher Dr. David Sabatini gave me his first TV interview since a Boston jury awarded him $6 million in a defamation lawsuit against a prominent MIT scientist who accused him of sexual coercion. My report airs this evening on #Boston25. I will post the link when it’s done.

En el contexto en que se me está acusando de abusar a una persona cuando después de hacer todo consensuado hicimos eso, si a mí también me da asco compartir eso pero es la única manera que tengo de defenderme por que si yo digo que no lo hice, le van a creer a presunta víctima

🚨BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES TROUBLING COORDINATION BETWEEN MIT AND WHITEHEAD LEADERSHIP IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL. 📑 We encourage readers to examine the original court exhibits and sworn testimony presented in Parts 1–5 of this thread. ⚠️ Sworn testimony and court exhibits reveal serious concerns surrounding @MIT's involvement in the institutional actions that devastated Professor @DMSabatini's scientific career. Particularly troubling are documented communications between MIT (@ScienceMIT) Dean of Science Nergis Mavalvala and Whitehead Institute (@WhiteheadInst) Director Ruth Lehmann, revealing their expressed alignment over Sabatini's case before MIT's tenure-review process was completed. Further court evidence raises serious concerns about outside pressure on MIT, potential conflicts of interest, and the failure to interview laboratory members who provided evidence favorable to Sabatini. The court exhibits and sworn testimony expose serious deficiencies in MIT's purportedly independent tenure-review process, including documented alignment between senior institutional officials before the review was completed and the failure to interview laboratory members who offered evidence favorable to Professor Sabatini. These revelations demand a comprehensive, independent investigation into MIT's institutional actions, the individuals involved, their communications, and any misconduct that contributed to the devastating consequences for Professor Sabatini. 📑 The original court evidence supporting these concerns is presented in Parts 1–5 below. We encourage the scientific community to examine it carefully. ⚖️ THE JURY'S VERDICT AND $6 MILLION DAMAGES AWARD SHOULD MARK THE BEGINNING, NOT THE END, OF ACCOUNTABILITY. The verdict should serve as a catalyst for investigating MIT and the individuals whose actions may have contributed to Professor Sabatini's prolonged ordeal and the immense financial, professional, and reputational consequences he has endured. 🔱 MORE INVESTIGATIVE EXPOSÉS ARE COMING. STAY TUNED. ⚠️ @SciGuardians 🔱