i scaled @WisprFlow's paid ads on meta here's how i'd rebuild it in 30 days

somehow the corposlops refused to use my video

See so many brain dead takes on Starlink saying there should be more competition to Airtel & Jio Let me give you a quick Capitalism 101 class, on what would happen 1/ Combined Jio + Airtel market cap is ~ 24 L cr - say $240 b 2/ SpaceX market cap is $2.3 T ( 10X combined MCap of Jio and Airtel) 3/ Moment Starlink is launched in India, Market cap would correct by 10-20% ( like what happened in US), say $24B 4/ Musk can infinitely undercut Jio and Airtel forever, they have $2.4T of Mcap to burn 5/ Non Zero proababilty of Airtel &/Jio going bankrupt 6/ Worst Part is ZERO upside for India- majority of zip codes from Kashmir to Kanyakumari have been covered & (apart from some made up use cases of some guy stuck in the mountains of Arunachal Pradesh for whom Star link is required) 7/ Worse case after Bankrupting Airtel and Jio, Musk can incease the price by 10X with no competition and we will be sitting ducks 8/ We have already lost the AI, Big Tech war, telecom is a basic necessity/ utility and we can't afford to lose this for ZERO gain to India 9/ If we want FDI, do what Jio did, get META, MSFT as investors, don't get an operator You are welcome!

has anyone seen my shoes

Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo

Liftoff of Starship's first orbital flight

Last few days, I ran 50-100 of my workflows (that earlier used Fable 5.1 as the orchestrator) on Opus 5.5 and found minimal differences. But there’s still the FOMO of not using the smarter model. What are some tasks people find Fable 5.1 to still be better at than Opus 5.5?