Aladdin Kumar (@AladinKumar1) profile picture

Software developer. Fighting the Network. I am a bear, of very little brain, and long words bother me

Boston
Joined July 2019
Years ago I participated in "fight apathy" on the delusion we would all sit in a bar discussing nerdy things like corporate integration. Now no ones apathetic and everyone is discussing stupider things. I regret my participation.
2
1
1
16
Here’s the thing: Dario’s contempt for the customer shows through in the model itself! Opus uses so much jargon, speaks in a grating tone, doesn’t seem willing to work with the user at all, and so on. And that eventually does impact enterprise sales!
Dario Amodei: A lot of AI generated videos and images are fake, addictive, and just slop. Anthropic isn't interested in competing in that market. “Google and OpenAI are fighting it out in consumer. It's existential to both of them.” “It's existential to OpenAI because that's their whole business. Existential to Google because they have the search business.” “For enterprise business, there's not really a demand for cats riding donkeys or whatever consumer video people want.” “If we ever need it, we can just contract a model from someone else.” “A lot of short-form video is fake, a lot of it's pretty addictive, a lot of it's slop.” “It's not a part of the market that I'm tripping over myself to get involved in.”
27
There’s a bit about AI where, as the models get smarter, they become increasingly more grating and impossible to use. And it seems clear in using them that the model almost wishes I wasn’t here and I’m the one causing the issues. And that might cause some people to dislike it?
1
14
Idk what the solution is! Because yes, lol, I should be cut out of the process, and maybe people will be, that’s where job losses will come from. It’s just how it is, it’s not something that can be stopped
8
“On immigration, perhaps THE signature issue, Trump essentially min-maxxed effectiveness and backlash” He’s a TV host! He does this with everything! That’s his nature! From the beginning in 2016 this was clear.
Republicans are going to have a terrible night, and the simple reason why is that Trump has put up perhaps the worst *performance* this term of any president in a century or more. Remember that he entered with an actual mandate: the House and Senate, a popular vote victory and a swing-state sweep, and 6-3 Supreme Court. Democrats were afraid enough to vote for mild but real immigration restrictionist legislation in the Laken Riley Act. Everyone wondered how far the "Vibe Shift" would go. Trump managed to turn that into essentially zero durable wins whatsoever. He personally *hates* the very idea of legislation, the notion that he would have to spend time going back and forth with Congress, learning details and making compromises. So he simply didn't do it! He didn't make a compelling case for abolishing the filibuster. He didn't try communicating clearly to the public in support of popular bills to get to 60 votes. He just decided not to do it at all. So they passed an unpopular tax cut, some funding for ICE, and a sop to the crypto industry, and that was basically it. Least productive Congress in decades, due to the tastes of one man. Trump adopted one of the worst macro policies we've ever had: high deficits, high tariffs, and attacks on central bank independence. We managed to pay higher interest rates while still having high trade deficits AND weakening the dollar. Just a total failure. On immigration, perhaps THE signature issue, Trump essentially min-maxxed effectiveness and backlash. Instead of trying to leverage the political moment for new laws and a self-deportation agenda (that is, walling off the economy to remove the benefit of irregular presence in the US), he opted for a maximally aggressive approach. The administration spent attention, funds, legal manpower on stunts like deporting random people to Salvadoran prisons with essentially no due process. ICE and Border Patrol were encouraged to be aggressive and confrontational, which helped contribute to the shooting deaths of American protestors. It turns out, that's extremely unpopular! What about the approach of going after employers? The obvious vector? Trump hated that idea! He repeatedly has said he doesn't want to target businesses (especially farms) that use large amounts of illegal labor. This is just an incomprehensible position. Instead of charging a few dozen businessmen and removing the incentive for millions of illegal workers to be here, you arrest people off the street one by one at the cost of thousands of dollars in manpower per each, while their crying wives and kids post TikToks about it. Upshot on immigration: electoral strength turned into a crippling electoral weakness in exchange for deporting maybe 6% of the illegally present population. The tariffs were a total shitshow. Embarrassing rollout, no underlying theory of action at all. No targeted focus on key industries. Our country tariffed products we can't grow. We tariffed *inputs* of our own valuable exports. The schemes and amounts changed constantly, sending the stock market reeling and presenting scenes of chaos to the world. Trump's messaging throughout has been generationally bad. While facing nearly 2:1 unpopularity, he spends his days posting AI slop, saying he'll rename New Mexico or invade allies, among other bizarre remarks. He brags about a ballroom and a pool repainting while gas hits records. At no point has he ever attempted any kind of message discipline. Then there are the deeply unpopular attacks on rule of law, his "game-recognize-game" pardons for all manner of scammers and criminals, the crypto schemes that he and his family engage in, the evilly conceived and embarrassingly executed legal attacks on Comey, Jerome Powell, and others. With his monthslong stand on NOT releasing the Epstein files, he became maybe the first president ever to stake out a 99-1 issue on the 1% side. That's not even getting into Iran, DOGE, his candidate recruitment choices, or countless other things. Simply put: Trump has managed to royally screw up virtually every single facet of his presidency. It's been undeniable, voters have noticed, and there's really no escape from it. This is what the GOP base chose in early 2024, and this is the world they're living with now. Where they handed the reins of history to a fat, vain, washed-up old man and let him drive.
3
142
Really wish there was a way to just mute out all talk of politics from my feed until the midterms are over. I can’t do anything about the state of public policy and for me there is no time it’s less interesting than right before an election.
1
95
So just to baseline here: is it more ethical, or less ethical, then deanonymizing random posters on a blog to kick them out of academia?
This is a ridiculous way to go about it. Absolutely ridiculous. AI, told to find things wrong, will find things wrong. You still need to go through and identify what mistakes actually matter! Uncritically reposting this discredits the reposter. Right now it’s just a DDoS attack.
63
There is some value, I think, in being honest as a company in saying, hey, yes, AI is going to dramatically lead to employment reductions, but we can credibly promise to make sure this goes as smoothly as it possibly can. But we aren’t going to lie to you
Can anyone explain why $MSFT does this? The best employees that can quickly find jobs at other firms, leave - and the worst employees that can’t find other jobs, stay. Why allow this adverse selection over laying off low performers? Are they that worried about lawsuits?
1
1
37
Yes, buyouts are unfavored because better employees take them, but that doesn’t matter right now. They’re slashing by a 3rd, making deep cuts. This isn’t a performance issue.
10
The most important line of the Gates memo “Internet Tidal Wave” is that the people who opposed the change of the Internet had good reasons for it. And yet they were subsumed anyway It’s a similar thing here. AI can’t do X! Software engineers do this! Sure! It doesn’t matter
Are we still sticking to the "AI is being used as the excuse for layoffs" narrative? I had dinner with a long tenure $META employee (middle management) recently and he told me that roughly 40% of his role is now performed entirely by agents. He also told me that he isn't even an AI maxi. He said many of his team and others in the organization (AI maxis) have well over 40% of their roles (>70% depending on the role) performed by agents. He actually doesn't know what many spend the day doing. He told me many including himself are just waiting to be let go. Not if but when. Mind you this is obviously an AI native organization but I think the "AI is being used as the excuse for layoffs" narrative is looking increasingly tired...
3
46
“The skills section of your resume appears AI generated” I am not a pangram doubter by any means but there isn’t really a good way to format a skills section of a resume without it sounding like an LLM so …
28
Knicks just won the championship and partied all summer so not expected to be in tip top condition but the shooting needs to be much better than that. Decent first half but that last quarter was very sloppy.
44
LeBron James, considered by some the greatest of all time, is deliberately slamming into people to get free throws. This is sad for the NBA as a league and really dude you’re gonna go out like this?
2
124
Haven’t seen any Seahawks games before this one, have they been this bad all season? This is terrible. Darnolds performance is awful
86
Aladdin Kumar retweeted
Replying to @JamesonCamp
Next year, Muse Spark Open will be Siri AI. It will run completely locally and privately, and Meta provides it to Apple for free. Apple in exchange will lay off ATT. Zuck and Ternus will shake hands on stage and all will be right in the world.
1
42
Meta and Apple detente? Would be nice, the great powers settle their differences
Replying to @finkd
Congrats to the team! Amazing to run a model of Muse Spark Open's caliber and scale this efficiently, right from your desk. Mac Studio keeps pushing the boundaries of on-device AI!
1
38
This is awesome. They don’t need to be enemies! Apple cares about privacy, Meta might disagree with how they define the term, but open source models are private. And here they are natural allies.
15
SaaS is dead because everyone will use agents to do everything, not because people will vibe code Salesforce. This is very obviously true to anyone who understands how enterprise software works. There’s no argument from these guys, just endless strawmen, cope, and insults.
The Venn diagram of people who think saas is dead because normies will vibe code their own stuff and people before ai who said they’ll build all their own stuff because “im a dev” but never completed anything is a complete circle.
3
1
91
I really should be less worked up about this but a lot of people who should know better are inducing people to invest and work for companies that are going to go bankrupt
1
1
27
Look it’s one thing to disagree. I could be wrong! But SaaS companies themselves are investing in AI agents. Market is rerating software. Salesforce is selling agentic access without a UI. They all know I’m right about this. So why lie?
1
22
Meta can, and should, just offer a free API where they say can train on the API requests. It’s on brand, and for throwaway projects I’ll happily do that.
i'm not testing muse wonder, because: 1. without contributor tier, it's opus 5.5 at API price. why don't i just run opus 5.5 then... 2. it's weird to lock the "full" model behind their subscription i'm also not testing gemini 4 argon, because: 1. previous gemini models had lost my trust, and nothing so far gives me enough motivation to revisit 2. google's AI subscription doesn't allow the models to be used in 3p harnesses i know this sounds harsh to those companies, but i see many consumers are in a similar situation - we have way too many options, some of which are absolutely AMAZING right now. the bar is extremely high for us to justify spending any second of our time on an unproven model family meta and google need to both realize they are catching up on market perception, and are in no position to gate anything my suggestion to them would be to allow heavily subsidized access everywhere including openrouter and all 3p harnesses, and leverage that to get enough people to try their models. if the models are good, the words will then spread
1
21
Inevitably it won’t be as clean as this, some limitations would be needed, but they can do this and I am not sure why aren’t they.
6