Elvis.

I had a conversation with a female colleague just a week ago about men's inconsistencies. I told her something simple. Usually, women are busy vetting men during talking stage like interviewers on a panel, thinking it's only the men who should prove himself (but to who?), not knowing men are also vetting them, simultaneously. While busy vetting him, scoring him of, course because women don't entertain talking stages with people they've no interest in, on his side you may be failing and once he's dissatisfied, he just closes his tab and move. It shocks women a lot because they expect men to implement rejection similarly. A woman rejects you immediately if you don't meet a certain standard, or entertains you if you do then ticks ON whatever you prove. She'd eventually take you if no man she seems better comes in the picture. A man on the other side immediately puts you on a pedestal with boxes ticked, and he ticks OFF your shortcomings. The moment you go below a certain score, he packs up and just moves. This can happen before or after sex, and translates to women as inconsistencies. 💀 Women make the conversation about the man "to know him". In the process men silently scout from the dialogue for whatever information they want to know about the woman. Everything sounds logical, just that women are usually unaware of the level to which they're being scouted.