Ben North (@BenNorth95) header
Ben North (@BenNorth95) profile picture

Assistant General Counsel @USEEOC; personal account

Washington, DC
Joined June 2019
Photo by Ben North (@BenNorth95)Photo by Ben North (@BenNorth95)Photo by Ben North (@BenNorth95)Photo by Ben North (@BenNorth95)
It is the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders: male & female.
11,699
28,123
5,025
235,000
11,610,324
Ben North retweeted
Here’s the thing about spotting the horrendous, soulless AI-generated writing infecting every corner of the internet now: it’s not just about the words — it’s about the patterns. And once you start noticing them, you can’t unsee them. The unnecessary em dashes. The polished transitions. The examples given in groups of three. The weird metaphors that kind of make sense but kind of don’t — like a parachute opening inside a submarine. The load-bearing use of the term “load-bearing.” The random one sentence paragraphs. The way a bunch of bland gibberish is quietly reframed as a profound insight. The on-going and un-necessary hyphenation of every-day words that really don’t need it. The cliches. Read that again. Cliches. Louder for people in the back. Tons of cliches. That’s not a typo. Sit with that for a moment. And the biggest red flag? Asking yourself a question and answering it. Because honestly? No sentient human writes like this. And truthfully? If you can’t identify these red flags, you might not actually be sentient yourself. Because really? If this formatting doesn’t immediately strike you as awkward and artificial, it means you don’t read books. Ever. Seriously. But here’s where it gets interesting: It doesn’t. The point has been made but I’ll keep going. That’s what AI writing is all about. Let’s delve into real problem. It isn’t the technology. It’s the people using it because they’re too retarded to generate an original thought of their own. That’s not thoughtfulness. It’s intellectual laziness wearing digital makeup. It doesn’t make the internet more fun. It makes me want to throw my phone in the river and forsake all of humanity and live as a hermit in the woods for the rest of my life. Seriously this shit fills me with despair. I’m not kidding. And the distinction matters. Especially when you’re saying the distinction matters without actually drawing a distinction. But here’s what nobody tells you. When you ask a machine to manufacture your personality, you’re not just automating your writing. You’re quietly announcing that you’re a boring, insipid dork with nothing interesting to say. Let that sink in. The uncomfortable truth? AI didn’t turn these people into tedious midwits. It quietly revealed what they already were. And perhaps — just perhaps — that’s quietly the most important takeaway of all. But what do you think? Let's unpack this together in the comments. 👇
1,659
862
243
14,477
1,600,238
Ben North retweeted
🚨 $5 MILLION SETTLEMENT: EEOC and @TheJusticeDept secure major action against Instacart for allegedly discriminating against American workers. The agencies found evidence that Instacart's PERM recruitment practices favored temporary visa holders and created unlawful barriers for U.S. and American workers applying for jobs. Up to $4 million will be available for affected applicants, with an additional $1 million in civil penalties.
57
70
8
268
11,175
Thankfully Judge Reyes backed off this request at least. For those wondering, a common reason high level DOJ appointees sometimes signs briefs boils down to good leadership. If there is something that is likely to be contentious with a judge, a DOJ leader signs their name on the brief so that any issues someone has with the brief is directed at them rather than lower level attorneys. Regardless, it goes without saying that a decision such as this should not be something a judge is inquiring into.
Just now: Judge Reyes withdraws her request for DOJ to re-file yesterday's submission with any other DOJ attorneys who are willing to sign it. Reyes says she made decision after thinking about it more, consulting with her clerks.
32
48
7
436
106,028
Ben North retweeted
Absolutely stunning essay by @DouglasKMurray about the crisis in France. It includes this quote. thefp.com/p/douglas-murray-f…
130
1,348
83
7,325
287,440
Ben North retweeted
This is a *huge* grant. Follow up to the Harvard case. This is the same issue raised by the Thomas Jefferson case in VA. And could affect (for example) Texas's top 10% plan. Read the orders list here: supremecourt.gov/orders/cour…
3
7
1
34
1,957
#SCOTUS grants challenge to use of taxing power to prohibit home distilling. #MakeEnumeratedPowersLimitedAgain
3
12
1
62
3,691
Ben North retweeted
Had the border not been sealed America would have been lost. Never before has such an existential promise been kept so fully and completely — against unrelenting and unceasing opposition from the entire Democrat Party and Democrat lawyers, judges, NGOs, media and politicians.
17 months of a secured border. It's morning again, America.
1,635
7,057
177
30,167
287,825
Ben North retweeted
Western liberals imported the third world into France and other countries in the name of diversity and compassion. They ignored fundamental questions of assimilation and compatibility. They were told it would lead to this and they didn't listen. I pray that France, a beautiful country of amazing people, will stop this madness before more of its landmarks burn. And I hope Americans are paying attention. This is the future congressional Democrats seek for your country.
BREAKING: The town hall of Limoges, built in 1873, didn’t survive today’s riots. The building’s spire has now collapsed
12,250
41,848
3,263
236,912
11,582,491
"Rape victims may take time to process trauma & understand they were raped" is now standard discourse. I'm sure delayed reaction to trauma happens -- but how much of this is ideology-driven "science"? @EmilyYoffe's 2017 @atlantic piece raises questions theatlantic.com/education/ar…
23
32
2
269
27,987
Update: @FDRLST’s @briannalyman2 asked CBS NY for comment. They confirmed having the full text exchange and choosing to leave “our body our choice” out of the story. (This means NYT likely got the same info from Jane Doe’s camp and made the same choice.) thefederalist.com/2026/10/09…
141
583
82
3,445
1,343,660
“Why isn't the EEOC imposing bigger fines?” “That recovery is just a drop in the bucket.” “Why won’t you tell us whether you’re investigating?” “Arrest people or shut up.” I frequently hear the public's frustrations and questions about the EEOC’s authority. Your concerns matter to me. Here’s what workers should know: The EEOC can recover money for individual workers and groups of workers, secure company-wide policy changes and other relief, and coordinate with other federal agencies. Workers do not need to hire their own attorney for the EEOC to obtain relief. EEOC cannot, and does not, fine employers--every EEOC recovery represents real money going straight to real workers. The EEOC also has legal limits. It cannot arrest people or bring criminal prosecutions. Its enforcement authority covers specific federal employment discrimination laws—not every workplace dispute. The EEOC must protect confidential charge and investigation information. Public proceedings and public resolutions allow the agency to discuss certain matters, but do not make every detail public. Just because EEOC is quiet about something currently otherwise in the news does not mean a lack of enforcement activity--it may just mean we're hard at work but can't talk about it yet. News reports can inform a Commissioner-initiated charge. But the EEOC cannot find a Title VII violations based on news reports alone, without an EEOC charge. We are a charge-driven agency. Know your rights. Learn more about the EEOC and how to file a charge at eeoc.gov. Act promptly. Filing deadlines apply.
🤖 Made with AI
23
72
4
184
6,835
Ben North retweeted
As a former New York sex crimes prosecutor, I would like everyone to know that if someone is “too intoxicated to consent,” it is ALREADY illegal under NY law for someone to engage in sexual activity with them, regardless of whether the victim was voluntarily or involuntarily intoxicated. It is dangerous to tell people otherwise.
No, Glenn. Your hypothetical only works if you erase the word “consent.” If someone is too intoxicated to consent, it shouldn’t matter whether they chose to drink or someone else gave them the alcohol. It’s really not that complicated. That’s why a majority of states don’t have this loophole.
558
60
24
809
202,130
Rather relevant to current events
Just in: First-of-its-kind verdict: Jury holds @UofMaryland liable for gender discrimination in case filed by wrongly acc’d student. After not-guilty TIX finding by campus tribunal, student was harassed by victims’ rights group. Reported it to UM but TIX office did nothing. @BenNorth95 briefed case thru summary judgment; Jared Roberts prevailed at trial.
1
4
50
4,352
Ben North retweeted
Just in: First-of-its-kind verdict: Jury holds @UofMaryland liable for gender discrimination in case filed by wrongly acc’d student. After not-guilty TIX finding by campus tribunal, student was harassed by victims’ rights group. Reported it to UM but TIX office did nothing. @BenNorth95 briefed case thru summary judgment; Jared Roberts prevailed at trial.
11
82
12
462
33,954
Take note that false allegations of sexual harassment are in fact sexual harassment. Great work by @JaredJRoberts and @JGreaves1787 on advancing the law here.
Five years ago we brought litigation against the University of Maryland for violating Title IX when it completely ignored my client’s claim that he, a male student, was being sexually harassed by a female group on campus that was spreading lies about him. Today, after a week long jury trial, and five years of litigation, a Maryland jury found the University liable for violating federal law. These are the days you don’t forget as a lawyer. Cc: @BenNorth95 @JGreaves1787
5
11
1,666
Five years ago we brought litigation against the University of Maryland for violating Title IX when it completely ignored my client’s claim that he, a male student, was being sexually harassed by a female group on campus that was spreading lies about him. Today, after a week long jury trial, and five years of litigation, a Maryland jury found the University liable for violating federal law. These are the days you don’t forget as a lawyer. Cc: @BenNorth95 @JGreaves1787
36
159
4
3,488
113,445
The administrative process used by Cornell to discipline the "Cornell 7" was an absolute kangaroo court. A hearing officer surfed the web during the hearings; Cornell didn't even notify one student of the charge he was facing. An UnHerd investigation unherd.com/2026/10/inside-a-…
3
17
1
76
22,328
They never changed
and just like that, Dem pols are milking this without a care for due process or the presumption of innocence.
3
579