I started looking deeper at 16- that was 1980. Media is business, not a tool for awareness. Polite & curious - I’m in REPLIES | Q since 11/17
Light years from home
Joined November 2022
- Tweets61.3K
- Following1.2K
- Followers2.6K
- Likes97.5K
Pinned Tweet
Nothing's Happening?
A thread 🧵
1/6 Trump Admin 2.0 receipts. Not vibes. Border, crime, energy, space, fraud, files, peace through strength.
BORDER Ended catch-and-release. Zero releases of illegal crossers for 13–15 straight months.
Southwest crossings at modern historic lows. Daily numbers went from thousands to a few hundred.
Negative net migration in 2025 — first time in ~50 years. ~2.5–3 million left (deportations + self-deportations). Illegal population down at least 2.3 million by admin count.
Laken Riley Act. Secure America Act / Big Beautiful Bill border money. ~250 miles of new wall by late 2026. Rio Grande water barriers started.
ICE nearly doubled to ~22,000. Detention at record levels.
Fentanyl at the southern border down ~56%. Fentanyl deaths down ~22%. HALT Fentanyl Act. 175k+ visas revoked. Benefits cut off. Denaturalization push. CDL fraud crackdown.
ICE: 2,000+ known/suspected terrorists removed. 10,000+ migrant gang members arrested.
Ben Around retweeted
When I first posted the 15% Band, I compared Republicans vs. Democrats, so it covered 30 Senate races.
Now that results are nearly final, I updated it to include every vote: Republicans, Democrats, independents, third parties, everyone, in all 35 Senate races. Then I ran a new regression analysis. Once again, the number came back .85.
34 of 35 Senate Republicans fell below President Trump's 2024 share. Red states and blue states lost the same proportion.
In some states the lost votes went to Democrats. In others, like Idaho, Nebraska and Montana, they went to independents. Different opponents, different places for the votes to go, and the Republican share still landed at about 85%.
This isn't just an average. An average can hide states scattered all over the place. A regression tests whether one rule fits every state.
Here, it does: Trump's 2024 share × .85 lands close to the Republican result state after state after state, and explains 87% of the differences between them (R² = .87).
Five nights ago, I was pretty sure. Tonight, I know.
This is real. It deserves an answer.
Ben Around retweeted
The writ of habeas corpus has been formally suspended four times in United States history under the Suspension Clause (Article I, Section 9, Clause 2).
1. The American Civil War (1861–1865)
• Who & When: Initially ordered by President Abraham Lincoln on his own authority beginning in 1861, and later authorized nationwide by Congress through the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act of March 3, 1863.
• Context: Used to detain suspected Confederate spies, Southern sympathizers (Copperheads), draft resisters, and military deserters.
• Legal Clash: Chief Justice Roger B. Taney ruled in Ex parte Merryman (1861) that only Congress—not the President—held the power to suspend habeas corpus, a conflict Lincoln initially bypassed before Congress retroactively backed the suspension.
2. Reconstruction and the Ku Klux Klan Act (1871)
• Who & When: President Ulysses S. Grant in 1871.
• Context: Suspended across nine counties in South Carolina (frequently cited as eleven counties in some historical summaries).
• Authority: Authorized by Congress via the Ku Klux Klan Act of April 20, 1871, to arrest armed conspirators and white supremacist paramilitary members terrorizing Black citizens and local officials.
3. The Philippines Insurrection (1905)
• Who & When: Colonial Governor Luke Wright in 1905.
• Context: Suspended in two provinces (Cavite and Batangas) of the Philippines (then an unorganized U.S. territory).
• Authority: Implemented pursuant to an Act of Congress on July 1, 1902, to suppress ongoing anti-colonial insurrection and armed banditry.
4. World War II in Hawaii (1941–1944)
• Who & When: Hawaii Territorial Governor Joseph B. Poindexter (with the approval of President Franklin D. Roosevelt) immediately following the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, lasting until 1944.
• Context: Imposed martial law and suspended habeas corpus across the entire Hawaiian Territory.
• Legal Resolution: Later overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in Duncan v. Kahanamoku (1946), which ruled that military tribunals could not lawfully replace civilian courts where the regular courts were able to function.
Yup
President Trump is right to call out the voting machines. I created this visualization last night showing that legacy Dominion voting machines were being used almost everywhere a district went blue.
Not only that, the red dots represents every time a person registered to vote without proof-of-citizenship.
Do you see the overlap between the two maps?
Below is the video I meant to share in my last post.
1
23
Ben Around retweeted
🚨 THE CRITICAL PATH DID WE ALREADY TAKE DOWN THE NETWORK...
Everybody remembers what happened on September 11, 2001.
But what happened to the NETWORK behind it?
FOLLOW THE MONEY. FOLLOW THE ARRESTS. FOLLOW THE TIMELINE.
🇩🇪 2001 GERMANY
Investigators uncover the Hamburg cell. Three of the four 9/11 pilots had lived in Hamburg.
Bank accounts. Money transfers. International connections.
🇺🇸🇩🇪 SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 THE RECEIPT
The U.S. Treasury publicly freezes the assets of FOUR Hamburg-cell operatives identified by German authorities.
✅ Germany had already frozen their assets.
✅ The U.S. followed with its own freeze.
✅ Germany sent the names to the UN, cutting them off from the global banking system.
✅ Treasury called it "the product of international collaboration."
And where were the four?
➡️ One under arrest in Germany.
➡️ One captured in Pakistan, in U.S. custody.
➡️ Two on the run.
This wasn't speculation.
IT WAS AN OFFICIAL, PUBLIC, CROSS-BORDER ACTION.
🌎 NOW ZOOM OUT.
That same Treasury release said something bigger:
by September 2002, just one year after the attacks, more than 160 countries had orders in force to freeze terrorist money.
Think about that.
Different countries. Different governments. Different banking systems.
ONE SHARED SET OF RULES, adopted in about twelve months.
That was the starting point. What got built on top of it over the next two decades:
➡️ Expanded financial surveillance.
➡️ Stronger anti-money-laundering laws.
➡️ International sanctions coordination.
➡️ Cross-border intelligence sharing.
➡️ More sophisticated systems for tracing illicit money.
Fast-forward 25 years.
Now we're watching governments use many of these same tools against cartels, money launderers, sanctioned entities and crypto-linked criminal networks.
HERE'S THE QUESTION NOBODY SHOULD IGNORE:
Did the world build an international financial enforcement system after 9/11 that became the foundation for much broader operations?
👉YES. THAT DEVELOPMENT IS DOCUMENTED.
Did the original Hamburg cell get taken apart?
LARGELY, YES. The pilots died in the attacks. Its coordinator was captured. One supporter was convicted in Germany. Some others were never brought to trial or convicted.
Does that mean the wider network is gone?
NO. AND THAT'S AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION.
But the architecture is real.
The freezes are real.
The sanctions are real.
The financial investigations are real.
And the institutional history stretches across decades.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO CONTROL EVERY BORDER WHEN YOU CAN TRACE THE MONEY CROSSING IT.
Twenty-five years later, the question isn't whether international financial enforcement exists.
IT'S HOW FAR THAT SYSTEM HAS EVOLVED —AND WHICH NETWORKS IT HAS ACTUALLY DISMANTLED.
IT'S NOT THE FLAG.
IT'S NOT THE PARTY.
IT'S THE NETWORK.
I am the Guy on The Couch, and you have been Debriefed.
📚 Source: U.S. Treasury, September 30, 2002
home.treasury.gov/news/press…
@Homeranger17 @CouchGuy17 @gizadeathstar @BeerCan45 @ScottZPatriot @AstuteActual
🤔🚨 THE CRITICAL PATH DIFFERENT BEGINNINGS. ONE YEAR OF ENDINGS.
FIRST THE LAW. THEN THE ARCHITECTURE. NOW THE ENFORCEMENT.
2001–2026 | FOLLOW THE TIMELINE.
After 9/11, the United States didn't simply build a counterterrorism response.
It constructed an interconnected legal, financial, intelligence, and enforcement architecture.
2001: The PATRIOT Act. Section 311. New powers to identify money-laundering concerns and restrict access to the American banking system.
2002–2003: Homeland Security. ICE. CBP. The Coast Guard and Secret Service transferred into a reorganized security structure.
2004: Treasury's Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. The integration of financial intelligence, sanctions, and terrorist-financing policy.
2005–2006: FBI National Security Branch. DOJ National Security Division. Intelligence and criminal investigations brought into closer alignment.
2007–2008: National continuity reforms. Foreign-investment security. Expanded foreign-intelligence authorities.
THE ARCHITECTURE WAS BUILT.
But here's where my Enforcement Workbook becomes interesting.
I'm not talking about investigations that all started in 2026.
I'M TALKING ABOUT INVESTIGATIONS THAT STARTED YEARS SOMETIMES DECADES APART, NOW REACHING MAJOR RESOLUTIONS IN 2026.
Look at the timeline:
🔹 STANDARD CHARTERED: Federal Reserve orders dating to 2012 and 2019. Both terminated February 2026.
🔹 HELIX CRYPTO MIXER: Activities stretching back to 2014–2017. Criminal proceedings spanning years. Final forfeiture order in January 2026 involving more than $400 million.
🔹 INCOGNITO MARKET: Criminal activity dating to approximately 2020. Arrest and guilty plea in 2024. Thirty-year sentence in February 2026.
🔹 SINALOA CARTEL / EL MAYO: A criminal organization with decades of history. Arrest in 2024. Guilty plea in 2025. Life sentence and a $15 billion forfeiture order in July 2026.
🔹 ICBC: Federal Reserve enforcement orders originating in 2021 and 2024. Both terminated in February 2026.
DIFFERENT COUNTRIES. DIFFERENT INDUSTRIES. DIFFERENT INVESTIGATIONS. DIFFERENT STARTING POINTS.
BUT SIGNIFICANT ENDPOINTS IN THE SAME YEAR.
Now think about that.
If all these cases had started in 2026, that would tell one story.
But they didn't.
Some started more than a decade ago. Others involved criminal enterprises stretching back much further.
Yet their major legal and regulatory milestones are appearing together.
Is the concentration historically unusual? That's what the data must establish. Does it demonstrate one coordinated operation? Not by timing alone.
But it raises a serious question worth investigating.
DID THE POST-9/11 ENFORCEMENT ARCHITECTURE EVENTUALLY ENABLE A BROADER CAMPAIGN AGAINST TRANSNATIONAL ILLICIT FINANCIAL NETWORKS?
That's what we're tracing.
Not just the headlines.
The original laws. The agencies. The investigative history. The financial instruments. The final orders. The forfeitures. The sentences.
THE BEGINNINGS ARE SCATTERED ACROSS DECADES. THE ENDINGS ARE WHAT I'M WATCHING.
And we're putting them all on one timeline.
THE TIMELINE NEVER LIES.
THE DEBRIEFING 17 | THE CRITICAL PATH
Wow! 🐸
Hear me out.
If the ODNI/DOJ/DHS are using Super Intelligence to cross reference state voter data with federal citizenship data, theoretically, we could pinpoint every single illegal voter, as well as their address on record when they voted.
In other words, by the Dems letting all their illegals vote in the election, they just gave Trump the location of all their illegal voters.
Then the Stephen Miller promotion comes into play. What is Miller known for? NATSEC and Presidential emergency powers, including pushing for the suspension of habeas corpus to stop the migrant invasion.
What if Trump wanted the Dems to let their illegals vote in the election, so he could use SI to create a grid of all their illegals, so he could then use emergency powers to conduct mass deportations on all the illegals interfering in our elections?
The subversion of our elections makes the illegals, and their Democrat puppet masters, literal insurrectionists. This is an insurrection by legal definition.
The DOJ/FBI/DHS publicly warned that EVERYONE who illegally votes in our elections, will be hunted down and prosecuted.
What if it really was a trap?
Let the illegals vote, pinpoint all of their locations, invoke insurrection act, allow US MIL to conduct arrests on US soil, suspend habeas corpus for all the illegals, mass deport all the invaders/insurrectionists, imprison all their co-conspirators in the Democracy Party, save the Republic.
Cloward Piven defined:
I worked for weeks on this video hoping it would make even just a tiny difference in the election.
Combing through years of digs, researching vigorously, adding to them, re-vetting them, and pouring over data.
The 2nd week I barely slept, and the night before the election I went for 24 hours straight just to finish in time. I eventually cut off the 8 minute intro which I knew I'd never be able to add visuals to in time and finally finished/posted it at 9am. Then I passed out and woke back up at 4pm to go vote.
I did this because I truly believe in President Trump and want to make a difference. This fight is real to me.
While I worked on this others worked day and night to convince Trump Supporters that there was no reason the vote.
Q embedded an urgency in people. They begged people to get involved, to fight. To dig. To make sure their voice was heard. Not figuratively. Its quite literally what they were about.
I'm down with that train of thinking. If others want to insist that everything is fake — and lead people to conclude it’s not worth the effort —that’s on them. But I find it incredibly subversive.
Ben Around retweeted
Ossoff, Talarico, and Cooper would have won even if none of their voters showed up on election day.
Ben Around retweeted
Nope. Machines flip votes. 🗳️
The movie Democracy (2006) explicitly shows electronic voting machines being hacked so votes can be altered or “flipped.” The film culminates in a real-world demonstration (the Hursti Hack) in which a Finnish security expert changes election results on actual machines by modifying a memory card—producing incorrect totals, including techniques that can add negative votes.
Ben Around retweeted
Well, there are some things that can be proven and some things that are just opinion.
Maybe you can prove to me what you say by showing me the sexual misconduct claim that came before Donald Trump ran for president?
(Please pay attention to the word "claim" so we don't waste each other's time).
Also, please come up with an example where the woman did not date him afterwards...
Good luck hero!
