Down Syndrome parent. Evertonian. PRO: life, equality, environment, free speech, respect. ANTI: Unfounded generalisations and blanket statements.
UK
Joined February 2021
- Tweets46.3K
- Following498
- Followers388
- Likes31.6K
Pinned Tweet
"Every child who a woman expects in her womb is a gift that changes a family’s history: the life of fathers and mothers, grandparents and of brothers and sisters. That child needs to be welcomed, loved and nurtured. Always!"
- Pope Francis (21/03/21) #WorldDownSyndromeDay
So much for impartial.
BREAKING: BBC forced to take down its education website used by millions after it was found to contain all sorts of devices and articles promoting the Labour Party, leftist politics, as well as ‘extreme views on migration and Net Zero’ (via @DailyMail) dailymail.com/news/article-1…
How is Brennan Johnson still on the pitch?? God forbid Moyes replace a player before the 60min mark 🤦🏻♂️
"Blue Nose" Panda retweeted
🚨 @ariyadhiah
The final decision on goal attribution rests with the Referees Committee of the Saudi Arabian Football Federation.
The Saudi Pro League does not rely on goal tallies from international websites and apps, including Opta. The referee’s report is the official document, and any discrepancies are referred to the committee for review and possible correction.
Referee Abdullah Al Owaidan officially credited Al Nassr’s second goal against Al Faisaly to Cristiano Ronaldo in his match report, taking the Portuguese star to 982 career goals for club and country.
Slow this vid down further and it’s very clear the ball changes direction after hitting Ronaldo’s head, therefore it’s a Ronaldo goal 🤷🏻♂️
OPTA are wrong by official officiating standards.
🚨 UPDATE: Opta has officially credited Al Nassr's second goal as an own goal by Andrei Girotto.
Following Opta's decision, @Sofascore and @FotMob have automatically corrected their records and now also list it as an own goal, rather than a Cristiano Ronaldo goal.
"Blue Nose" Panda retweeted
The worst line you can have on your CV as a manager is: I could not work with Cristiano Ronaldo.
Look at the list and tell me I'm lying:
Rafa Benitez - Came to Real Madrid, said Ronaldo is not his main man, wanted to build around Bale. Wanted Ronaldo to play different. What happened? Sacked in 7 months. Never coached a top elite club again. Newcastle, Everton, Celta. Finished.
Maurizio Sarri - Juventus. Said he had a problem because Ronaldo's presence affected Dybala. Tried to bench him, sub him. Won the league and STILL got sacked. Never seen again at the top.
Ralf Rangnick - Interim fraud. Came to Man United talking about pressing professor. Benched Ronaldo, humiliated him. Lost the dressing room. United finished 6th. Now managing Austria. No top club will touch him.
Rudi Garcia - Al Nassr. Benched Ronaldo, said he does not fit his system. Sacked 3 months later. Now where? Napoli disaster, sacked again.
Fernando Santos - Portugal. Benched Ronaldo at the World Cup for Goncalo Ramos because of tactics. Lost to Morocco. Sacked. Now managing Azerbaijan. From European Champions to Azerbaijan.
Erik ten Hag - The biggest example. Had Ronaldo who scored 24 goals the season before. Said he does not fit his attacking dynamic football, wanted Wout Weghorst who scored 2 goals. Fought him, disrespected him, terminated his contract. Result? 8th position, 58 goals conceded, sacked, now hiding in Germany.
Every manager who thought he was bigger than Ronaldo, every manager who said Ronaldo doesn't suit ME - their career died immediately after.
Coincidence? No. It's a curse.
Ronaldo is not a player you manage. He is a system you embrace. Ancelotti embraced him, won 3 UCLs. Zidane embraced him, won 3 UCLs in a row. Ferguson embraced him, won everything.
The ones who couldn't work with him exposed themselves. They are not elite managers. They are system managers with no system.
If you can't work with the most hardworking, most professional, most clutch player in history who just wants to win, the problem is not Ronaldo.
The problem is YOU.
Ronaldo apparently “didn’t prepare himself”
Does ten Hag seriously expect people to believe someone as utterly fanatical and disciplined over fitness and training as Ronaldo “didn’t prepare himself”? 🤡
🚨 Erik ten Hag on Cristiano Ronaldo in training: “He ran neither in possession nor out of possession. The reason was because he didn’t prepare himself”.
“Every top team has to embrace the top player, but the top player has to work for the team…”, told @TheAthleticFC.
"Blue Nose" Panda retweeted
Civil servants were embedded inside the BBC newsroom working on coverage of politically sensitive subjects including immigration, small boats and Covid.
And we are supposed to believe nobody saw an obvious problem with this? We all knew the BBC was a voice box for the government. Now we have the evidence.
"Blue Nose" Panda retweeted
🚨scrap the bbc NOW!
📱 An investigation revealed that BBC Bitesize, used weekly by nearly 1.7 million UK pupils, features a game encouraging children to support open borders and increased immigration.
🎮 The game penalises pupils who choose deportation with lost points while rewarding those who select amnesty or open borders with extra points and positive feedback.
📺 The platform lists twice as many benefits to migration as disadvantages, while a geography video asks if we can "fulfil the promise of a truly borderless world."
🗣️ Politicians and former BBC executives expressed outrage, with Gavin Williamson MP stating: "The state broadcaster brainwashing children using a homework game is like something from a North Korean re-education camp."
Nearly 1.7 million British schoolchildren log on to BBC Bitesize every week, only to be taught that deporting illegal entrants hurts public health while opening borders earns bonus points. This is not impartial public service broadcasting; it is blatant political indoctrination disguised as homework.
When a state-funded institution uses taxpayer money to push extreme open-border dogmas onto secondary school pupils, it exposes how deeply entrenched left-wing bias has become within our public institutions.
How can parents trust the BBC to educate their children when basic national sovereignty is treated as a penalty in a classroom game?
