Looks like @LauraLoomer or Larry whichever you prefer has lost all credibility. Bye Larry.
Replying to @OwenShroyer1776
It's rigged for certain people. It's not free speech it's hidden speech. The South African transhumanist lied.
Oh look @TheCharlesDowns the Massie hater has some explaining to do.
Replying to @TheCharlesDowns
@TheCharlesDowns you absolutely participated. I did not pay you, Loomer did. You just scrubbed your X today to hide your association with her. You know what you did and you benefited massively. I will not delete anything. Please sue me if I'm lying.
Replying to @data_republican
Are these accounts for real. Fed slop
Why is @catturd2 protected? Is it because he sucks off Elon every chance he gets?
The question is are @catturd2 @GuntherEagleman @Hunter_Eagleman @nicksortor @Shawn_Farash @DefiyantlyFree and others getting checks as well. How many of these maga accounts involved.
WaPo: Laura Loomer has been taking undisclosed payments from private clients to post political content on X—reportedly $3k–$5k per tweet, with bank records showing >$60k to her and her company King Breaker Media. Trump campaign adviser Alex Bruesewitz confirmed paying her for policy posts.
Just like we’ve all been saying: she’s not an independent America First voice. She’s a paid operative for big corporate interests—and most likely Israel. The receipts are finally here, and she can’t spin this one away.
Elon rigs this place
The X algorithm is completely fucked up.
Thomas Massie gets 5.2 million views, 194,000 likes, 30,000 reposts, and 7,100 comments.
Meanwhile, Dave Portnoy, a jew who makes money getting young people hooked on gambling, gets 3 million views for some meaningless bullshit.
Massie gets 22 TIMES more likes, 117 TIMES (!!!) more reposts, and 24 TIMES more comments, but ONLY 1.7 TIMES as many views.
Apparently, X would rather push degeneracy and gambling culture onto young people than give genuine political dissent the reach its engagement deserves.
What a fucking joke.
















