Pyote AFB
Joined November 2023
- Tweets4.2K
- Following165
- Followers287
- Likes11.1K
Pinned Tweet
@AshtonForbes The "orbs" aren't mysterious. They're spherical relay mirror drones for a Ground-Based Laser weapons system that's been in development since 1984. Here's the timeline and paper trail. Everything cited is publicly available. 🧵Oh, and hi mr. cia. 👋
**1984 — BRADUSKILL INTERCEPTOR CONCEPT**
U.S. Army Strategic Defense Command, Huntsville, Alabama. LTC James Boschma develops a "slow-kill" midcourse interceptor: a platform that launches from Arctic basing, flies alongside Soviet ICBMs during midcourse, uses onboard sensors to discriminate warheads from decoys, then deploys sub-interceptors.
Contractors: Lockheed, Martin Marietta, LTV, Sperry Systems, Teledyne Brown Engineering.
The core capability: a self-positioning platform that flies alongside a target and tracks it with precision sensors.
Program officially killed FY1987. "Ceases to appear in the histories."
Sources:
- army.mil/article/151589/smdc…
- globalsecurity.org/space/sys…
**1985-1991 — GROUND BASED LASER (GBL) SYSTEM EVOLUTION**
The USAF Directed Energy Weapons Program Office develops the GBL architecture through four periods. Lt. Donald Fielden presents the full evolution at the 28th Space Congress, April 25, 1991.
The architecture:
- Ground-based Free Electron Laser fires upward
- Relay mirrors in high earth orbit redirect the beam
- "Fighting mirror" in medium earth orbit focuses on target
- Entire system under an "automated battle manager"
Key detail from the paper: relay mirrors were needed at multiple altitudes to achieve full Earth coverage. The paper describes the evolution from afocal mirrors to bifocal mirrors to the full relay chain.
The problem Fielden identifies: atmospheric absorption in the first few km, coverage gaps from orbital mechanics, and retarget time limitations of fixed-orbit mirrors.
Source: Fielden, Donald J., "Paper Session III-C - Ground Based Laser System - Defense at the Speed of Light" (1991). The Space Congress Proceedings. commons.erau.edu/space-congr…
**THE CONVERGENCE: BRADUSKILL + GBL**
Braduskill dies in 1987. The GBL relay mirror architecture matures 1988-1991. Same contractors (Lockheed, Martin Marietta). Same command structure (SMDC Huntsville). The "slow flyalong" platform concept doesn't die — it morphs from kinetic kill vehicle to beam relay node.
A self-positioning drone that can fly alongside a target and track it with sensors is also a self-positioning drone that can hold station at altitude and redirect a laser beam.
Braduskill didn't die. It stopped being a missile and became a mirror.
**1965 — THE PROPULSION (YES, 1965)**
Townsend Brown, US Patent 3,187,206, "Electrokinetic Apparatus." Granted June 1, 1965. Describes a propulsion system using asymmetric high-voltage electrostatic pressure. Operates in vacuum. Pulsed DC. No propellant. No exhaust. No moving parts.
This was validated in vacuum in 1955-56 at SNCF laboratories in Paris with French military observers present.
Modern validation: Charles Buhler, former NASA lead electrostatic scientist, founded Exodus Propulsion Technologies. 2,000+ test articles. Thrust measured at 237 millinewtons at 40 kV. Thrust persists after power-off. Thrust increases in vacuum. Reverses when flipped. Published: WO2020159603A2, "Asymmetrical Electrostatic Pressure."
The "orbs" are spherical drones using this propulsion. Spherical hull form encasing relay mirror optics. Electrostatic propulsion = no exhaust, no sound, no radar cross-section. The high-voltage field ionizes surrounding air, creating the visible glow people report.
**2010 — DIA CONFIRMS THE PULSED POWER ARCHITECTURE**
DIA reference document DIA-08-0912-005, "Pulsed High-Power Microwave Source Technology," 28 January 2010. Produced under the AAWSA (Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications) Program — the same program behind all 38 DIA advanced technology papers.
Contents include Marx Generators, High-Voltage Switching, Cesium Iodide cathodes, Dielectric Tapering, Solid-State Switching. This is the pulsed power source technology for both the GBL and the drone propulsion system. Same architecture drives both.
**BAE SYSTEMS — LASER DEVELOPED ATMOSPHERIC LENS**
BAE publicly disclosed the concept: high-power pulsed lasers ionize a region of atmosphere, creating a lens through reversible heating or ionization. The ionized pocket acts as a refractive/reflective optical element. Beams can be redirected through it.
Side effect: the ionized atmospheric volume glows. People on the ground see a luminous sphere. They report an "orb."
This is the mechanism by which the relay drone creates visible effects even when the drone itself is too small to see — the beam interaction with the ionized envelope around the drone is what's visible, not necessarily the drone itself.
**2025-2026 — OPERATIONAL CONFIRMATION FROM @TMBSPACESHIPS**
An X account reportedly operated by Neil McCasland (USAF Major General, Ret., former commander of Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB) posted 99 technical disclosures before going silent on Feb 27, 2026.
Post 24 (Feb 28, 2025): "There is a Nav INDEX REFERENCE SYSTEM for 'Indexing/Caging' the onboard Attitude Reference System in the Area near Mineral Wells still in function. THIS WILL CAUSE LOCAL SIGHTINGS. This Nav Index Reference System is for 'Compass Alignment' the same as conventional aircraft but uses UVX/C optical Data link, using Link16 Optical architecture."
He's describing a ground-based optical system that communicates with airborne relay assets via UV-band data link. The optical interaction creates visible atmospheric effects. He literally says it will cause sightings.
Post 34 (Aug 28, 2025): "Optical Bernoulli Forces — Conceptual need for CFD studies in PLASMA DYNAMICS." Links to a Physical Review A paper on radiation pressure creating fluid-dynamic effects in plasma. This is the physics of a high-power beam interacting with the ionized envelope around a relay drone.
Post 21 (Feb 27, 2025): Describes the Calvine UFO as built at "NASA's McGregor RP-1 Plant." States it used "Radioactive antenna" with "Radium, Mercury and Fluorine in its ION seed gas." The seed gas ionizes surrounding air = luminous envelope. People see the glow, not the airframe.
Post 29 (Feb 13, 2026): "DOE/DOD and antigravity vehicle Fuselages are coated in Thermal Plasma Spray Coating. Alternating layers of Osmium and Cooper are the first few mills thick in the Stochastically Engineered Glass-like Electret coating."
**THE OPERATIONAL PICTURE**
You deploy 3-4 spherical electrostatic drones as relay nodes. The GBL fires from the ground. Beam hits first drone, redirects to second, redirects to third, final node focuses on target.
The drones:
- Self-positioning via electrostatic propulsion (no exhaust, no sound)
- Station-keeping at any altitude (not constrained to orbital mechanics)
- Reconfigure formation geometry in real time
- No radar cross-section
- No orbital track
- Ionized envelope = visible glow = "orb" reports
- Beam interaction = BAE atmospheric lens effect
This solves every problem Fielden identified in 1991:
- Atmospheric absorption: drone at low altitude, only punch through a few km of air
- Coverage gaps: mobile drones, not fixed-orbit satellites
- Retarget time: formation reconfigures, no satellite slew rate limit
- Survivability: unpredictable position, no exhaust signature
**THREE LAYERS OF "ORB" SIGHTINGS**
1. Ground-generated: BAE atmospheric lens — laser ionizes atmosphere directly, no physical drone needed. Creates a visible glowing pocket that functions as an optical element. Manufacturing sightings on demand.
2. Drone-generated: Physical spherical relay drone with electrostatic propulsion. The HV field ionizes surrounding air. Luminous envelope. Witnesses see a glowing sphere and report an orb.
3. Vehicle-generated: Larger electrogravitic craft (Temple Torpedo class, Calvine class) using ion seed gas that creates a luminous sheath around the entire airframe. Witnesses see the glow and report a "craft-shaped light."
All three use the same underlying physics: high-voltage ionization of atmosphere creating visible luminous effects.
**THE TIMELINE SUMMARY**
1965 — Brown patents electrostatic propulsion (US 3,187,206)
1984 — Braduskill: self-positioning flyalong platform concept (Army SDI)
1985-91 — GBL relay mirror architecture matures (USAF Directed Energy)
1987 — Braduskill officially "killed" — concept migrates to beam relay role
1991 — Fielden publishes GBL architecture at Space Congress
2010 — DIA publishes pulsed power source document under AAWSA
2020s — Buhler validates electrostatic thrust in vacuum (Exodus Propulsion)
2022-26 — @TMBSPACESHIPS discloses operational details including "local sightings" from nav optical systems
Present — BAE publicly markets "Laser Developed Atmospheric Lens"
**WHAT THIS MEANS**
The "orbs" are not alien. Not interdimensional. Not plasma balls of unknown origin. They are relay mirror drones for a directed energy weapons architecture that has been in continuous development for 40 years, using propulsion technology patented in 1965 and validated by NASA scientists.
The engineering is in the public patents. The architecture is in published Space Congress proceedings. The DIA wrote the pulsed power specifications. BAE made a promotional video about the atmospheric lens. A retired USAF Major General described the navigation and optical systems on Twitter.
Everything is in the public record. Nobody connected the dots.
---
# APPENDIX: THE MATH
For the engineers and physicists in the audience. Every number below is derivable from public sources.
## A. ELECTROSTATIC PROPULSION — FORCE LAW
The fundamental force equation for asymmetric electrostatic pressure:
**F = (ε₀ × E²) / 2 × A**
Where:
- F = force (Newtons)
- ε₀ = permittivity of free space = 8.854 × 10⁻¹² F/m
- E = electric field strength (V/m)
- A = electrode area (m²)
This is not exotic physics. This is Maxwell's stress tensor applied to an asymmetric capacitor. The force arises because the electric field is stronger on one side of the capacitor than the other (due to electrode geometry asymmetry), creating a net pressure differential.
**Worked example — Buhler's validated result:**
- Voltage: 40 kV
- Gap: ~1 cm (0.01 m)
- E = V/d = 40,000 / 0.01 = 4 × 10⁶ V/m
- Electrostatic pressure: P = ε₀E²/2 = (8.854 × 10⁻¹²)(4 × 10⁶)² / 2 = 70.8 Pa
- With T-blade geometry (9 blades, 4" length, 0.25" height): effective area ≈ 0.0023 m²
- Theoretical force: F = 70.8 × 0.0023 = 0.163 N = 163 mN
- Buhler measured: **237 mN** (higher than simple calculation due to ground plane features providing 6× enhancement)
**Scaling to vacuum (Brown's insight):**
In atmosphere, breakdown limits E to ~3 × 10⁶ V/m (30 kV/cm).
In vacuum, breakdown limit rises to ~10⁸ V/m or higher.
Force scales as E². So vacuum operation gives (10⁸/3×10⁶)² = **~1,100× more force** than atmosphere at the same voltage.
This is why Brown's patent specifies vacuum operation. This is why Buhler's thrust increases in vacuum. The atmosphere is the bottleneck, not the physics.
## B. ENERGY IN THE SYSTEM
Energy stored in a capacitor:
**E = ½CV²**
Where:
- E = energy (Joules)
- C = capacitance (Farads)
- V = voltage (Volts)
**For a relay drone (estimated):**
- Capacitance: 100 pF (typical for a small asymmetric electrode array)
- Voltage: 40 kV
- Energy per cycle: E = ½ × 100 × 10⁻¹² × (40,000)² = 0.08 J
- At 100 Hz repetition rate: Power = 0.08 × 100 = **8 watts average**
A spherical relay drone could operate its propulsion system on **less than 10 watts**. A small lithium battery pack could sustain hours of station-keeping. This is not a high-power system — the force-to-power ratio of electrostatic propulsion is extraordinarily favorable because there is no reaction mass to accelerate.
## C. IONIZATION THRESHOLD — WHY THEY GLOW
Air ionization occurs when the electric field exceeds the Paschen breakdown threshold:
**At sea level:** E_breakdown ≈ 3 × 10⁶ V/m (30 kV/cm)
**At 10 km altitude:** E_breakdown ≈ 1 × 10⁶ V/m (air density drops)
**At 30 km altitude:** E_breakdown ≈ 1 × 10⁵ V/m
A drone operating at 40 kV with a 10 cm electrode gap produces E = 4 × 10⁶ V/m at the electrode surface. This exceeds breakdown at sea level. At altitude, the margin is even larger.
The ionized air around the electrodes emits light — primarily in the blue-violet and UV range (nitrogen emission lines at 337 nm, 357 nm, and 391 nm). With seed gases (cesium, fluorine per TMB), the emission spectrum shifts and broadens, producing the white-orange-blue glow variations reported by witnesses.
**Visible range at night:** A corona discharge of 8W total power, with even 1% conversion to visible light, produces ~80 milliwatts of visible radiation. At 1 km distance, this is easily visible to the naked eye — equivalent to a bright LED at the same range.
**At altitude:** Thinner air means larger ionization volume for the same field strength. The "orb" appears larger at higher altitude because the glow region expands as air density drops.
## D. GBL BEAM PHYSICS
**Free Electron Laser specifications (from Fielden paper):**
- Wavelength: ~1 μm (near-infrared)
- Power: classified, but FEL technology in the 1990s achieved megawatt-class continuous beam
- Beam divergence: diffraction-limited for FEL, ~1 μrad for a 1m aperture at 1 μm wavelength
**Atmospheric absorption at 1 μm:**
- Sea level to 10 km: ~30-50% loss (Rayleigh scattering + molecular absorption)
- 10 km to space: ~5% additional loss
This is why you want the first relay node as LOW as possible — to minimize the atmospheric path. A drone at 10 km altitude cuts your atmospheric loss roughly in half compared to punching all the way to orbit from sea level.
**Beam spot size at relay drone:**
- At 10 km range with 1 μrad divergence: spot diameter = 10,000 × 10⁻⁶ = 0.01 m = 1 cm
- At 100 km range: spot diameter = 10 cm
- At 1000 km range: spot diameter = 1 m
A relay drone at 10-100 km altitude needs a mirror aperture of only **1-10 cm** to capture and redirect the full beam. This is trivially small for a spherical drone of any reasonable size.
**Beam energy density at target:**
- 1 MW beam focused to a 10 cm spot: power density = 10⁶ / (π × 0.05²) = **127 MW/m²**
- For reference: the surface of the sun delivers about 63 MW/m² to surrounding space
- This is sufficient to destroy any known material in seconds
## E. BAE ATMOSPHERIC LENS — REFRACTIVE INDEX CHANGE
When a laser ionizes a volume of atmosphere, it changes the local refractive index:
**Neutral air:** n ≈ 1.000293 (at sea level)
**Fully ionized air (plasma):** n = √(1 - ωₚ²/ω²)
Where:
- ωₚ = plasma frequency = √(nₑe²/ε₀mₑ)
- nₑ = electron density
- ω = laser frequency
For a 1 μm laser (ω ≈ 1.88 × 10¹⁵ rad/s) and a plasma with nₑ = 10¹⁸ m⁻³:
- ωₚ = √(10¹⁸ × (1.6×10⁻¹⁹)² / (8.854×10⁻¹² × 9.109×10⁻³¹)) = 5.64 × 10¹⁰ rad/s
- n = √(1 - (5.64×10¹⁰)²/(1.88×10¹⁵)²) ≈ 0.99999955
The refractive index change is small but sufficient to create a lens over a large volume. A 100-meter diameter ionized region with Δn ≈ 10⁻⁶ acts as a lens with focal length:
**f ≈ R²/(2 × Δn × L)**
Where R = beam radius, L = lens thickness. For R = 1m, L = 100m, Δn = 10⁻⁶:
- f ≈ 1² / (2 × 10⁻⁶ × 100) = **5,000 meters**
This is a weak lens but over astronomical distances (satellite to ground), the cumulative effect of multiple atmospheric lens nodes is significant. And the focal length can be tuned by adjusting the ionization power — more power = higher electron density = shorter focal length.
## F. OPTICAL BERNOULLI FORCES (TMB POST 34)
TMB references the 2013 Physical Review A paper on Optical Bernoulli Forces (Phys. Rev. A 88, 023829). The concept:
When a beam passes through a medium with a refractive index gradient, radiation pressure creates a lateral force analogous to the Bernoulli effect in fluid dynamics. Higher beam intensity = lower "optical pressure" = objects are drawn toward the beam center.
For a plasma envelope around a relay drone:
- The beam creates an intensity gradient across the ionized volume
- The gradient produces a lateral restoring force that centers the plasma on the beam
- This is a **self-centering mechanism** — the atmospheric lens automatically aligns with the beam
This means the relay system is partially self-correcting. The beam itself helps stabilize the ionized volume it's passing through. The "orb" doesn't need to be perfectly positioned — the optical Bernoulli force pulls the plasma lens into alignment.
**Force magnitude (order of magnitude):**
- For a 1 MW beam with a 10 cm spot passing through plasma with n_e = 10¹⁸ m⁻³
- Radiation pressure: P_rad = I/c = 10⁶/(π×0.05²×3×10⁸) ≈ 0.42 Pa
- Over a 1 m³ volume: F ≈ 0.42 N
This is small but non-negligible — it's the same order of magnitude as the electrostatic propulsion force on the drone itself. The beam and the drone form a coupled system.
## G. DRONE STATION-KEEPING — THRUST VS. DRAG
**At 10 km altitude:**
- Air density: ρ ≈ 0.41 kg/m³
- Drag on a 30 cm sphere at 1 m/s (gentle drift): F_drag = ½ρv²CdA = ½ × 0.41 × 1² × 0.47 × π(0.15)² ≈ 0.007 N = 7 mN
- Buhler-class electrostatic thrust: 237 mN at 40 kV
- Thrust-to-drag ratio: **34:1** — easily sufficient for station-keeping
**At 30 km altitude:**
- Air density: ρ ≈ 0.018 kg/m³
- Same drag calculation: F_drag ≈ 0.0003 N = 0.3 mN
- Thrust-to-drag ratio: **790:1** — the drone can maneuver aggressively
**At 100 km altitude (edge of space):**
- Air density: ρ ≈ 5.6 × 10⁻⁷ kg/m³
- Drag is essentially zero
- The drone operates in near-vacuum where electrostatic thrust is MAXIMIZED (no breakdown limit)
- Force scales up by ~1,100× compared to sea level
## H. WEIGHT BUDGET FOR A RELAY DRONE
**Target: self-sustaining spherical relay drone**
| Component | Mass (g) |
|-----------|----------|
| Spherical hull (carbon fiber, 30 cm dia, 1mm wall) | 200 |
| Electrode array (copper tape, asymmetric geometry) | 50 |
| ZVS driver + flyback transformer | 80 |
| Capacitor bank (film caps, 40 kV) | 30 |
| Relay mirror (lightweight concave, 10 cm aperture) | 100 |
| Gimbal mechanism (micro servos) | 40 |
| Control electronics (microcontroller + IMU + GPS) | 20 |
| UVX/C optical transceiver (Link16 architecture) | 50 |
| LiPo battery (3S, 2200 mAh, 24 Wh) | 180 |
| Wiring, connectors, potting compound | 50 |
| **TOTAL** | **800 g** |
**Thrust required for hover at sea level:**
- Weight: 0.8 kg × 9.81 = 7.85 N
- Buhler-class thrust at 40 kV: 237 mN
- **Cannot hover at sea level on 40 kV alone**
**Thrust required for hover at 30 km (stratospheric):**
- Weight still 7.85 N (gravity doesn't change much)
- But in near-vacuum, electrostatic thrust scales up ~1,100×
- Available thrust: 237 mN × 1,100 = **260 N**
- Thrust-to-weight ratio: **33:1** — easily hovering, highly maneuverable
**This is why the "orbs" are typically reported at high altitude.** The physics works best where the air is thinnest. The drones likely launch conventionally (rocket, balloon, or aircraft release) to reach operational altitude, then switch to electrostatic propulsion for station-keeping and maneuvering.
## I. LINK16 OPTICAL ARCHITECTURE (TMB POST 24)
TMB specifies "UVX/C optical Data link, using Link16 Optical architecture."
Link16 is a standard NATO tactical data link (MIL-STD-6016). It normally operates at UHF (960-1215 MHz) using TDMA. An "optical" variant would use the same protocol structure but transmit via laser instead of RF.
**UVX/C** likely refers to UV-C band: 200-280 nm wavelength. Why UV-C?
- UV-C is completely absorbed by the ozone layer at ~30 km altitude
- A UV-C data link between a ground station and a drone at 30 km is invisible to any observer above the ozone layer (satellites can't see it)
- UV-C is also invisible to human eyes
- But UV-C ionizes air along the beam path — producing visible fluorescence at the point where the beam terminates on the drone
**This is why the navigation system "causes local sightings":**
- The UV-C data link beam ionizes air as it passes through the lower atmosphere
- At the drone, the beam terminates on the optical receiver
- The ionized air around the termination point fluoresces in visible wavelengths
- Ground observers see a glowing point — an "orb"
The sighting IS the data link. The communication channel is the glow.
## J. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL PARAMETERS
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| Electrostatic force law | F = ε₀E²/2 × A | Maxwell stress tensor |
| Buhler measured thrust | 237 mN @ 40 kV | WO2020159603A2 |
| Vacuum thrust enhancement | ~1,100× vs sea level | E² scaling, Paschen limit removal |
| Air breakdown (sea level) | 3 × 10⁶ V/m | Standard Paschen curve |
| Air breakdown (30 km) | ~10⁵ V/m | Altitude-adjusted Paschen |
| N₂ emission (corona glow) | 337, 357, 391 nm | Standard nitrogen spectroscopy |
| GBL wavelength | ~1 μm (near-IR) | Fielden 1991 |
| Atmospheric lens Δn | ~10⁻⁶ | Plasma dispersion relation |
| UV-C data link band | 200-280 nm | UVX/C specification |
| Ozone absorption altitude | ~30 km | Standard atmospheric physics |
| Relay drone mass (est.) | ~800 g | Component-level estimate |
| Drone operating altitude | 30-100+ km | Optimal thrust-to-drag regime |
| Power consumption (propulsion) | ~8 W | ½CV² × rep rate |
| Station-keeping endurance (24 Wh battery) | ~3 hours at 8W | Battery capacity / power draw |
All values are derivable from public physics, published patents, and standard engineering references. Nothing here requires classified information. The physics has been in textbooks for over a century. The patents have been public since 1965. The architecture was published at a Space Congress in 1991.
The "orbs" are spherical relay mirror drones for a directed energy weapons system, using electrostatic propulsion patented 60 years ago and validated by NASA scientists. They glow because high-voltage ionizes air. They're seen at high altitude because that's where the physics works best. The UV data link that communicates with them produces visible fluorescence at the termination point.
That's the math. Check it yourself.
Jeff is the most productive name ive found for any agent since like march, he always abides. kind of funny to think about honestly.
24
Calliagh retweeted
Doing a VIDEO SPACE at 7pm EDT tonight with @Turdoty_gobble & my fellow Doty acolyte @Kermlyfe. We will be watching Mirage Men, doing a live commentary, discussing the recent New Paris Recording and alien dental cast auction, diving into the Doty Transcript ™️and more!
We've all seen Mirage Men before, but I promise you will learn something new tonight!
Video spaces cannot be scheduled in advance. You will not be able to watch the video screen unless you are on iPhone or PC.
Calliagh retweeted
The original source (AFAIK) for there being an underground facility at the former Northrop Tejon RCS site is a book by William F. Hamilton called COSMIC TOP SECRET. This book is frequently cited by @UAPGERB in his research.
I was recently told by a source that this was the facility Jake Barber was flying people to in 2023/2024. That is the story, the lore, according to this source and it has it's roots in Hamilton's book.
Whether or not there is or was an underground facility at Tejon Ranch is up for debate. I can't wait to see what @uncannyex's second video shows! It is debuting tomorrow. Link to first video in quoted tweet below.
I must correct my previous speculation from February 2025, where I asserted that the Lockheed Martin Helendale RCS facility was the most likely location from the Jake Barber/Herrera story. The Helendale facility seemed most likely because of many reasons, but mostly because the facility a)has a verified "underground" component and b)is still actively used.
It appears I was wrong, insofar as the story is being told.
I have transcribed the pages from COSMIC TOP SECRET which mention Tejon Ranch and the "ANTHILL".
WILLIAM F. HAMILTON III
COSMIC TOP SECRET
AMERICA’S SECRET UFO PROGRAM
INTRODUCTION BY
JOHN LEAR
Page 66
Cosmic Top Secret
[Continued from the preceding page.]
show on KVEG in Las Vegas. He called in to say that he was a security officer who worked on the test site. He was disgruntled with activities at work. He made the discovery that one of the security men he worked with was a humanoid alien he referred to as a “benevolent one.” The other little grey aliens were called EBEs (for Extraterrestrial Biological Entities, a term that appears in the MJ-12 briefing document). Yellow Fruit revealed that a conflict was going on between the benevolent ones and the EBEs and that now the benevolent ones had gained the upper hand at Dreamland where he said a contingent of 37 benevolent ones were stationed and where 3 EBEs were held in captivity.
Bizarre? Science Fiction? Yellow Fruit knew a lot about the test site area. I resolved to go to a location he gave of an EBE installation in Deep Springs, California, then to visit Pat and Joe at the Rachel Bar & Grill (now called affectionately, the “Little A’Le’Inn”) to make contact with him. Yellow Fruit is the name for the first level of security force at Area 51 and also the name of an old Army-CIA unit. The second level of security he called “Sea Spray” and intimated that you would have an encounter of the unpleasant kind if you ever met with them.
Callers to the Billy Goodman Radio Happening had already organized trips to mile-marker 29½ on highway 375, where a dirt road left the highway to intersect the road to Dreamland. There was a heavy black mail box on this road which identified the spot. I got to Rachel early one October morning and left my business card with Pat at Rachel’s Bar and Grill to pass on to Yellow Fruit whom she knew by sight. I then inspected the dirt roads where people stood to observe the test flights. I had already interviewed four witnesses by phone who testified that they had seen UFOs over the Groom Mountains. On certain nights, in the same area, they were seen by John Lear. I made a second trip to the area in late October when a public group visited Rachel. That’s when I saw the mysterious Yellow Fruit. He later called me on the phone. I gave him a copy of my book, “Alien Magic” and he remarked on the research I had done concerning a search for underground bases.
According to Yellowfruit and others there are underground bases and tunnels that conceal the activities of the aliens and the secret government projects.
I had first found out about underground facilities years ago
[Continues on page 67.]
Page 67
William F. Hamilton III
when there were reports of an alien base near Mount Shasta. Then came the underground laboratory at Dulce which I had gone to investigate in 1988. I arrived at no definite conclusions. Another one was reported in the Tejon Ranch in the Tehachapi mountains of the Antelope Valley in California. Now I learned there were underground bases and tunnels beneath the Nevada Test Site.
One night another mysterious man called Billy Goodman saying that he worked deep underground in a tunnel 3,000 feet below the Mercury base camp at the Nevada Test Site in a stainless steel atmosphere. He was hired as an electrician for Reynolds Electronics and Engineering (a subsidiary of EG&G) and was very disturbed after an incident in which marines had pushed him around and intimidated him in the tunnel when he said he saw doctors in white coats wheel four little alien bodies through the tunnel on gurneys. He also went on to say that strange things are going on below the Nevada Test Site, that huge government black operations are taking place, and that he and some fellow workers were very scared. In later phone calls to some researchers in Las Vegas, this caller has said that up to 50 Mercury Workers have united and have decided to do something to help Bob Lazar get out his story and their story about aliens living in underground habitats.
There’s no physical proof to demonstrate the reality of this. It is only testimony. There are many who have testified that they have seen the saucers flying over the Groom Mountains. There are people with video cameras who have recorded some of these night flights. Japanese television crews have taken a keen interest in the reputed saucer activity at Groom Lake. We have the testimony of scientists and technicians who say they have seen saucers and/or aliens on the Nevada Test Site and leaked documents that say something is going on out there. Some have claimed it is disinformation. However, information becomes disinformation only when proven to be false. While there may be false information given out by some of these sources, eyewitness testimony tends to corroborate the statement that secret saucer test flights are being conducted in Nevada. One man, Gary Schultz, has conducted field trips to the mail box road viewing area to watch the saucer testing. Gary calls his trips “Secret Saucer Base Expeditions.” He, too, has taken a photo of one of the domed discs overflying the mail-box road. There are many eyewitnesses and they have all seen the orange-glowing craft over the Groom mountains.
Page 99
William F. Hamilton III
[Pages 68–98 are not included in the image. This excerpt begins mid-sentence.]
feet in diameter. An igloo would be constructed over the hole, and a plastic bag dropped down the cavity and filled with air. The work area and living quarters would then be constructed.
It may prove more efficient and practical to “house” future moon colonies in artificial or natural caves beneath the lunar surface, than to attempt construction of exposed meteorite proof domes. Living quarters, spacious parks, lakes, and wooded areas could be constructed underground. A transportation tube would connect various colonists to other ports and distant parts of the moon.
Back on Earth, we have reports of equally spacious underground parks. An ex-security officer, who once worked underground in the Groom Lake area of Nevada, said he saw a baseball diamond and an Olympic-sized swimming pool in one of the artificial caverns a mile below the Nevada desert.
What’s going on in the deep underground tunnels below Mercury Base at the Nevada Test Site? After hearing the story of Bob Lazar on KVEG radio, a construction worker called Billy Goodman and Bob Lazar to say, “We are the construction workers...we put things together and take them apart...of the meeting of seven people, there are two who will come forward to support you.” This mysterious caller further said, “There’s more than just tunnels down there. There’s everything you can imagine down there. I know cause we put it up. We installed. We did everything.”
Informants have mentioned underground tunnels and facilities in New Mexico at Dulce, Sunspot, Datil, Corona, Taos Pueblo, and Albuquerque; in Arizona in the Santa Catalina Mountains; in Colorado at Delta, Grand Mesa, and Colorado Springs; in California at Needles, Edwards AFB, Tehachapi Mountains, Ft. Irwin, Norton AFB, and Morongo Valley; in Nevada at Blue Diamond, Nellis AFB, Groom Lake and Papoose Lake areas, Quartzite Mountain, and Tonopah.
I became interested in a possible underground installation in the Tehachapi Mountains in the summer of 1988. A young couple, Ray and Nancy, reported that they had gone to a plateau in the mountains after Ray’s shift work had completed at the Northrop Plant. Ray was an inspector on the B-2 project. The plateau is adjacent to the perimeter of the leased Tejon Ranch where Northop has built a secret underground facility. It was about one o’clock in the morning when Ray and Nancy spotted a brilliant orb coming out of the
[Continues on page 100. “Northop” appears as printed.]
Page 100
Cosmic Top Secret
ground which flashed light in their direction. They could not account for two-and-half hours of missing time. Ray thought that they had the orb under observation for about an hour, yet the next memory is of sunrise! Under hypnosis, Ray recalls being abducted and taken to an underground base populated by little grey EBEs and Air Force and security personnel. The EBEs were examining Nancy who had been restrained on a metal table. Ray’s emotions swelled under hypnotic recall of the incident.
As recounted previously, on October 26 of the same year, the giant boomerangs overflew this same facility.
A local man claims he saw a flying saucer emerge and take-off from a silo on the property.
A disgruntled contractor reported that he worked on constructing the tunnels in the underground area and was bothered by the Air Force probes that were often seen hovering in the tunnels. He described these probes as small orbs, and said that this facility was nick-named “The ANTHILL” because of its resemblance to underground ant colonies. The tunnels have round doorways without doors. Adjacent to the doorways are security panels with red and green lights. There are some kind of cylinders embedded in the doorway jambs that project a field or energy of some sort.
Black helicopters have been sighted around Boynton and Secret Canyon near Sedona, Arizona. A man living in Long Canyon has sighted a lot of strange things in the canyon areas, and residents suspect a secret government installation has been established in, of all places, Secret Mountain! One of my investigators hiked into Secret Canyon late one night and was stopped by a voice on a loudspeaker and a laser-targeting light on his chest. He was told he had entered a restricted area and to turn around and leave.
We have now spotted and photographed the small orbs around the “Anthill.” These orbs definitely exhibit the peculiar characteristics reported in other UFO sightings.
Since that time, we have located two other secret facilities. One is at a place in the Mojave Desert called LLano. It is an extremely secure facility, but witnesses have seen an extremely bright light burning atop a pylon inside of a movable behemoth-sized structure. This light does not illuminate the interior of the structure! Orbs have been seen in the vicinity of this facility as well.
We can only conjecture about what secret programs are being
[Continues on page 101.]
Page 101
William F. Hamilton III
conducted away from prying eyes. The underground can and does hold all sorts of secrets. Some of the most amazing revelations about what goes on in the underground projects comes from a mysterious informant named Thomas, who claims there is, indeed, a deep dark secret harbored underneath the imposing mountainous elevations of Northern New Mexico.
[Illustration of a possible ARV craft.]
Drawing supplied to author of possible ARV craft.
Sick video from @uncannyex about the mystery surrounding Northrop Grumman's Tejon Ranch RCS facility. Check it out! youtu.be/TRVzOxP-HJk?is=8GrR…
Wanna lift a lotta weight at the gym? Easy, just listen to this banger
music.youtube.com/watch?v=3D…
1
68
Calliagh retweeted
AI may well be able to write massive software projects “from scratch”, but that almost certainly isn’t the fastest / highest performance / highest security / most token efficient way to do things. Good building blocks matter.
In addition to RL’ing the agents on final task loss, we should try to get them to regularize the building blocks as well. What would the standard library look like that makes the agents most effective?
It is likely at the limit that it turns out to be some alien organization of code, but given the existing human-bias in training, I bet that in the near term it would be lovely code that old programmers would appreciate.
I suspect the same could be said for mathematics, but that is out of my lane.
💫 🪼 💫
High-Speed Energy-Efficient Resonant Modulator on a Graphene-Organic Hybrid Platform📲🤖🛜pubs.acs.org/apchd5/article/…
1
87
Calliagh retweeted
Collection of newspaper articles covering cattle mutilations from my archive. Images are 4k and can be read when zoomed in.
Don't forget to join @AAWSNAP1947 @UFOCircleJerk and myself tomorrow night at 7pm EDT for our 10th #UFOhistoryGroup space covering cattle mutes!
Join @AAWSNAP1947 @UFOCircleJerk & myself for the 10th #UFOhistoryGroup space this Monday night! We're covering the history of cattle mutilations🐄🛸🐄
I'm compiling our research compendium and will upload it later this evening.
Please hit🔔set reminder🔔, like❤️& share this post! nitter.gq/i/spaces/1pKkOXlyLkPKj
