CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
"Requests" to Courts/Tribunal should be construed as if it is a "direction"!
#SupremeCourt says that its "requests" to Courts/Tribunal should be construed as if it is a "direction":
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
While considering an appeal against acquittal, the Court should be slow to interfere where two views are possible, and the view in favour of the accused should be given primacy!
TINKARI GHOSH v. ANANDA MANDAL AND OTHERS caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
Replying to @barandbench
Earlier they had engaged @KapilSibal and now replaced him with SG ? or is he still appearing for State of Karnataka along with SG? Can you please clarify @barandbench !
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
Dear all, reading our posts on X are sufficient for a lawyer or law student to stay updated with latest Supreme Court Judgments. If you think you should support us, please subscribe here: caseciter.in/pricing ! Thank you in advance.
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
Das and Ranka give an undertaking to the SEM Court that they will not call for any protest at Jantar Mantar till it remains a denotified protest site.
They also state that they will not commit any breach of peace and that they have "full faith in the judiciary and all its instruments including the learned SEM Court."
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
BREAKING: CJP'S SAURAV DAS & ASHUTOSH RANKA RELEASED BY SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
Replying to @sardesairajdeep
We watched the full hearing.
The GenZ age remark was a casual one and such exchange between bar and bench is quite normal in many cases.
The judge questioned the counsel on merits of the matter and gave him time to seek instructions. Then he suddenly withdrew the plea.
According to us, he should have answered the questions instead of withdrawing.
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
SUPREME COURT A โSUPREME FAILUREโ. PUNISH ME FOR CONTEMPT FOR SAYING THIS. WILL ACCEPT IT AS BIGGEST AWARD IN MY POLITICAL CAREER: M A BABY (CPIM GEN SECY, EX-MP & LEAD SC PETITIONER IN PROTESTS CLAMPDOWN CASE)
Lead SC petitioner in pleas against clampdown on protests, metro,railway, internet shutdown Ex MP and CPIM Gen Secy M A Baby tells a Malayalam channel: โWhat I want to say about Supreme Court is โฆ the manner in which the court is currently discharging its responsibilities will force many to say that Indiaโs Supreme Court of today is a SUPREME FAILURE. I want that what I said just now should be translated and sent to the Supreme Court judges โฆIF THE SUPREME COURT TAKES COGNIZANCE OF THIS STATEMENT OF MINE AND DECIDES TO PUNISH ME FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT, I WILL ACCEPT IT AS THE BIGGEST AWARD I GOT IN MY POLITICAL CAREER SO FARโ.
Comments are surprising as when he filed petitions challenging several curbs and clampdown, lockdown in Delhi by authorities to thwart protests against CEC Gyanesh Kumar on SIR issue SC had granted slew of reliefs
--When Mr. Baby filed the petition on October 9, 2026 CJI took on board the matter and passed orders on urgent mentioning by his lawyer Kapil Sibal despite the case not being in the dayโs case list
--Hearing his petition, CJI Bench said โabsolute prohibitionโ on metro services and arrival of trains at New Delhi statition and Hazrat Nizamuddin amounted to โoverreachโ
---SC ordered lifting of internet shutdown during protests
--SC asked police to ensure smooth traffic by reducing number of barricading
--SC directed no inconvenience should be caused to general public in any manner
--SC ordered preservation of all CCTV footage and digital evidence vis-ร -vis complaints of excesses during protests
ALSO TOMORROW SC HOLDING A SPECIAL HEARING DURING DUSSEHRA VACATION TO HEAR APPEAL FILED BY EX KERALA CM, CPIM STALWART & Mr BABYโS LEADER PINARAYI VIJAYAN IN CMRL-EXALOGIC PAYOFFS CASE !!
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
Dear subscribers, our links open in X's inbuilt browser and this is why you face frequent log out issue. To avoid it, please do as shown here in X settings:
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
Replying to @CiteCase
Thank You for Sharing.
Execution Proceedings are very tingled. But, very interesting.
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
Almost always a question in Delhi Judiciary prelims - all started with Balco and eventually reached its conclusion in Soma while striking off Hardy.
How to ascertain juridical seat when arbitration agreement itself specifies two places?
Read this #SupremeCourt judgment:
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
Broken Windows Theory explained by #SupremeCourt in Re: Recent Rape Incidents in Delhi NCR
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
A handle I rely on the most for factual legal matters.
What I like the most is that it sticks to what the order actually says not the rhetoric surrounding it.
No sensationalism. No selective interpretation. Just the text, reasoning and substance of the order.
In an age where commentary often overtakes the judgment itself, that objectivity is invaluable.
This is the #SupremeCourt RoP from yesterday's hearing in Election Commission SIR matter.
The order does not record any submissions of the Counsel/view of the Court.
It just issues notice to @ECISVEEP !
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
After reading some articles, columns and social media posts by lawyers , legal journalists and professors on recent split verdict of Supreme Court in ECI appointment case, we have become fans of this quote โบ๏ธ
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
#SupremeCourt delivered 70+ Judgments on Criminal Law last month [September 2026]. We have published a digest and shared with our subscribers.
Here are a few judgments, which we believe, every lawyer, law student and a judge should read: ๐งต
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
We just shared our Supreme Court Monthly Digest [Criminal Law] of September 2026 with CaseCiter.in subscribers. It covers about 75 judgments.
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
Today on Gandhi Jayanti, caseciter.in is gifting one week Digests Plan subscription for those who repost this message and sends a DM to us.
CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ retweeted
Replying to @advsanjoy
You are a Senior Advocate. We urge you to withdraw this post, which is nothing but a veiled threat and insinuation against the Supreme Court of India. Disagreements and criticisms are fine, but lawyers must not stoop to this level.























