CaseCiter (@caseciter) header
CaseCiter (@caseciter) profile picture

CaseCiter

@caseciter

Legal Research| Supreme Court Judgement Updates

CaseCiter.in
Joined July 2022
  • Tweets3.2K
  • Following13
  • Followers4.5K
373Media
Photo by CaseCiter (@caseciter)Photo by CaseCiter (@caseciter)Photo by CaseCiter (@caseciter)Photo by CaseCiter (@caseciter)Photo by CaseCiter (@caseciter)Photo by CaseCiter (@caseciter)Photo by CaseCiter (@caseciter)Photo by CaseCiter (@caseciter)Photo by CaseCiter (@caseciter)Photo by CaseCiter (@caseciter)
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase5h
Is Section 37 jurisdiction as broad as Section 34 Jurisdiction?
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase5h
Shreeram Builders v. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
Shreeram Builders vs. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others

Shreeram Builders vs. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others

2026 INSC 1176 — An arbitral tribunal must decide in accordance with the express terms of the contract and cannot rewrite the contract or ignore its specific stipulations under the guise of…

caseciter.in
2
20
1,044
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase5h
Yet another saga of an arbitral award sailing into rough seas. 😅
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase5h
Shreeram Builders v. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
Shreeram Builders vs. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others

Shreeram Builders vs. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others

2026 INSC 1176 — An arbitral tribunal must decide in accordance with the express terms of the contract and cannot rewrite the contract or ignore its specific stipulations under the guise of…

caseciter.in
1
5
669
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase5h
Can a Court consider admissions made by a party in the course of proceedings in other suits relating to the same subject matter? #SupremeCourt discusses it here:
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase5h
Shreeram Builders v. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
Shreeram Builders vs. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others

Shreeram Builders vs. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others

2026 INSC 1176 — An arbitral tribunal must decide in accordance with the express terms of the contract and cannot rewrite the contract or ignore its specific stipulations under the guise of…

caseciter.in
1
18
944
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase5h
Shreeram Builders v. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
Shreeram Builders vs. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others

Shreeram Builders vs. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others

2026 INSC 1176 — An arbitral tribunal must decide in accordance with the express terms of the contract and cannot rewrite the contract or ignore its specific stipulations under the guise of…

caseciter.in
1
1
2
2,311
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase5h
Revenue entries made without any authority or jurisdiction constitute an act of nullity: #SupremeCourt !
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase5h
BANDARI RAMCHANDER & ORS. v. MAITRI COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
BANDARI RAMCHANDER & ORS. vs. MAITRI COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.

BANDARI RAMCHANDER & ORS. vs. MAITRI COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.

2026 INSC 1175 — Under the A.P. Abolition of Jagirs Regulation, 1358 Fasli, all jagir tenures were incorporated into State lands, and the State became the ultimate owner, with jagirdars entitled…

caseciter.in
5
19
1,071
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase5h
BANDARI RAMCHANDER & ORS. v. MAITRI COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
BANDARI RAMCHANDER & ORS. vs. MAITRI COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.

BANDARI RAMCHANDER & ORS. vs. MAITRI COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.

2026 INSC 1175 — Under the A.P. Abolition of Jagirs Regulation, 1358 Fasli, all jagir tenures were incorporated into State lands, and the State became the ultimate owner, with jagirdars entitled…

caseciter.in
1
1
1
1,237
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
A public interest litigant cannot move for withdrawal of the petition on the principle of dominus litis, without the leave of the Court, holds #SupremeCourt !
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
SRINIVASA T. & ORS. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
SRINIVASA T. & ORS. vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

SRINIVASA T. & ORS. vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2026 INSC 1173 — The legislature cannot sit in appeal over a judicial decision or annul a final judgment; it may only retrospectively change the legal basis of a decision by removing the defect or…

caseciter.in
7
24
1,245
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
#SupremeCourt expresses a little bit of surprise and a lot more alarm, about a judgment of Karnataka High Court; Says it threw to the winds every tenet of law and is bordering on the absurd.
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
SRINIVASA T. & ORS. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
SRINIVASA T. & ORS. vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

SRINIVASA T. & ORS. vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2026 INSC 1173 — The legislature cannot sit in appeal over a judicial decision or annul a final judgment; it may only retrospectively change the legal basis of a decision by removing the defect or…

caseciter.in
1
1
4
772
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
When #SupremeCourt quotes Unknown person 🙂
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
SRINIVASA T. & ORS. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
SRINIVASA T. & ORS. vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

SRINIVASA T. & ORS. vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2026 INSC 1173 — The legislature cannot sit in appeal over a judicial decision or annul a final judgment; it may only retrospectively change the legal basis of a decision by removing the defect or…

caseciter.in
6
1
49
6,159
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
SRINIVASA T. & ORS. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
SRINIVASA T. & ORS. vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

SRINIVASA T. & ORS. vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2026 INSC 1173 — The legislature cannot sit in appeal over a judicial decision or annul a final judgment; it may only retrospectively change the legal basis of a decision by removing the defect or…

caseciter.in
1
1
3
4,065
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase11h
Can mandatory minimum life imprisonment sentence be further reduced in a murder case citing old age of convict and long pendency? This #SupremeCourt order answers it.
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase11h
MADAN & ANR. v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
MADAN & ANR. vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

MADAN & ANR. vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Eye-witness testimony of sterling worth does not require corroboration from independent witnesses or forensic recovery of weapons.

caseciter.in
4
17
873
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase11h
MADAN & ANR. v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
MADAN & ANR. vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

MADAN & ANR. vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Eye-witness testimony of sterling worth does not require corroboration from independent witnesses or forensic recovery of weapons.

caseciter.in
2
1
6
1,146
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase12h
Inconvenience alone cannot be a ground for successfully seeking a transfer of a pending case from one State to the other, reiterates #SupremeCourt !
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase12h
MOHAMMED AFZAL v. M/S PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
MOHAMMED AFZAL vs. M/S PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD

MOHAMMED AFZAL vs. M/S PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD

Inconvenience or personal hardship to an accused party does not constitute a valid ground for transfer of criminal proceedings under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,…

caseciter.in
2
13
943
CaseCiter retweeted
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile picture
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase12h
MOHAMMED AFZAL v. M/S PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
MOHAMMED AFZAL vs. M/S PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD

MOHAMMED AFZAL vs. M/S PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD

Inconvenience or personal hardship to an accused party does not constitute a valid ground for transfer of criminal proceedings under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,…

caseciter.in
1
1
1
1,019
#SupremeCourt on burden of prosecution in disproportionate assets case: It need not negate every hypothetical source from which the accused may claim to have derived income.
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCaseOct 28
V. GOPALAKRISHNAN v. THE STATE OF KERALA caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
V. GOPALAKRISHNAN vs. THE STATE OF KERALA

V. GOPALAKRISHNAN vs. THE STATE OF KERALA

2026 INSC 1172 — In cases of disproportionate assets under Section 13(1)(e) of the PC Act, the prosecution must first establish a prima facie case by proving the known sources of income and the…

caseciter.in
2
24
1,322
V. GOPALAKRISHNAN v. THE STATE OF KERALA caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
V. GOPALAKRISHNAN vs. THE STATE OF KERALA

V. GOPALAKRISHNAN vs. THE STATE OF KERALA

2026 INSC 1172 — In cases of disproportionate assets under Section 13(1)(e) of the PC Act, the prosecution must first establish a prima facie case by proving the known sources of income and the…

caseciter.in
1
1
7
1,660
Important #SupremeCourt judgment on requirement of issuance of notice under S.143(2) Income Tax Act:
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCaseOct 28
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHUBANESHWAR v. ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHUBANESHWAR vs. ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD.

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHUBANESHWAR vs. ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD.

2026 INSC 1171 — Service of a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is a mandatory condition precedent for a valid assessment or reassessment; its omission is not a curable…

caseciter.in
2
16
1,164
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHUBANESHWAR v. ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHUBANESHWAR vs. ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD.

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHUBANESHWAR vs. ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD.

2026 INSC 1171 — Service of a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is a mandatory condition precedent for a valid assessment or reassessment; its omission is not a curable…

caseciter.in
1
1
3
1,519
How a matrimonial dispute burdens judicial system? Just count the number of cases:
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
1
7
29
3,409
#SupremeCourt holds that hyper-technical objection regarding the form or mode of communicating grounds of arrest cannot be treated as a self-executing, blanket key to unlock regular bail.
Image from CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase)
CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) profile pictureCiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCaseOct 28
STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. JHABRA RAM caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…
STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs. JHABRA RAM

STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs. JHABRA RAM

2026 INSC 1169 — The requirement to communicate grounds of arrest under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47 of the BNSS is intended to ensure the arrestee can effectively challenge…

caseciter.in
1
8
38
1,661
Load more