Husband, father, grandfather. Queen Scout. Dartmouth 1974. Chairman EEA https://nitter.gq/t.co/6ns444ta4i Past Chairman ABP Parler @freedomtalkDan
Lloydminster
Joined April 2011
- Tweets154K
- Following8.7K
- Followers9.2K
- Likes38.6K
Pinned Tweet
Thank you!
The 177,000-signature threshold has now been passed. This has now officially cleared the requirement for an Alberta independence referendum on October 19th. As I said, given the model’s forecast from May through September, rising global tensions will increase the potential for Alberta to vote for separation during the October elections.
Danny Hozack retweeted
A Secret Service agent who protected Trump recently said something that SHOCKED everyone: “Trump has RUINED me — I could never protect another President the same way again.” And before you assume he meant that as criticism, WAIT until you understand what he really meant by “ruined,” because his explanation of Trump has left people across the Secret Service deeply emotional.
Here’s what the agent meant by “Trump ruined me”:
This Secret Service agent had protected several Presidents before Trump. He was professionally trained, followed every rule, and performed his duty with discipline, distance, and dedication. He protected each President the same way — until he was assigned to Trump. That’s when EVERYTHING changed.
The agent explained:
“Trump RUINED me for this job. Not because he’s difficult — but because he’s completely different. Trump knows my NAME. Other Presidents called me ‘agent.’ Trump calls me by my actual name.
He knows my WIFE’S name. He knows my CHILDREN’S names. He asks about my son’s baseball games. Trump notices when I’ve been standing for 8 hours and tells me, ‘Sit down, you need to rest.’
During long days, Trump makes sure EXTRA food is available: ‘Make sure my guys eat first.’
When my FATHER passed away, Trump came to his funeral. No cameras. No reporters. No publicity. He simply came to honor the man who raised the person protecting him.
After being treated like THIS — how could I ever return to being just ‘agent’ to another President?
After Trump remembered my CHILDREN’S names, how could I protect someone who wouldn’t even bother learning mine?
After Trump treated me like FAMILY, how could I go back to feeling like FURNITURE?
Trump RUINED me.
He raised the standard so HIGH for how a President can treat the people protecting him that I could never accept the old standard again.
That’s what I mean when I say he ‘ruined’ me.”
Here’s what this confession supposedly shows: Trump didn’t simply have Secret Service agents protecting him — he made them feel VALUED, RESPECTED, and treated like FAMILY. Once someone experiences that kind of personal respect, it becomes impossible to accept being treated like nothing more than equipment.
Let me help you with your research:
Please check out Wikdroseloyaltycoalition. Com!
Message me if you have any questions! Thanks
As a UCP party member I will vote for removal of Smith.
However, I dont think she is the only globalist puppet in the party by far.
So I will not vote UCP in next election.
-9 months of malfeasance of Elections Alberta
CRICKETS from anyone in UCP
- UCP did not follow the mandates given by their voter base nor follow their platform and promises.
- leader went rogue
What did we hear from UCP?
CRICKETS
To my way of thinking their silence means they are complicit!
I no longer trust them. They are costumed, tickling our ears and cos playing conservatives.
I will spend my time til next election researching who deserves my vote in Alberta. And it certainly won't be for the uniparty(ndp-ucp)
Spare me the "if you dont vote Ucp you are handing the election to the NDP"
or
" choosing the lesser of two evils" bull$hit
Evil is evil!
42 years of voting. Born and raised a federalist. Life long conservative.
So I know what little c conservatives are.
Not the progressive cons who are liberal light.
Just look at the history.
This voting a party in so the other guys dont get in- doesn't work
Voting the other guy in to send a message- doesn't work (Notley)
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results
The politicians do not have to be accountable to their platform promises or mandates anymore. They know we will vote for them to keep the other guy out.
I am done !
As far as I am concerned from watching this closely for the last decade.
Doesn't matter federal or provincial. Different color jerseys all playing for the same home team!
All levels and branches have been corrupted.
At this point they throw us tokens to manage civil unrest. While still moving us continually down the road to the communist new world order Carney lauds about.
Latest examples
Smith announces:
Co vid jabbies= backlash
Token thrown...
DEI= applause
I would highly suggest for those that want to understand what is going on. Look for an interview on yt with YURI BESMENOV. About a hour long. A exKGB who defected to Canada. He takes you through the phases of turning a democratic country to socialism/communism ( on a whiteboard or chalkboard). With majority non the wiser.
As he goes through each phase he gives you examples. Note how many things happened/happening in real time in Canada in each and every phase.
Well you best buckle up because we are entering/in the last phase.
The Veteran's warned us to keep watch.
LEST WE FORGET
Canadians forgot
And a way out: votewlc.com/ 🙂
My letter to Rob Smith of the @Alberta_UCP
Dear Mr. Rob Smith,
In response to your letter to the UCP membership, I wish to humbly offer the following statement:
You cannot hijack a citizen initiative referendum, use its questionable data to consolidate power, tell your members to get in line or find another party, advance the Covid vaccine and expect unity.
Unity is based on a common vision that is larger than the party or the leader of the party.
The UCP once had a vision of a Sovereign Alberta that I could get behind. Now that the goal posts have been moved to “a stronger Alberta in a united Canada, it seems that the vision of the party has been reduced to “just beat the NDP.” That’s not leadership—that’s insecurity.
Rob, I believe in a vision of a Sovereign Alberta, where we develop our people, our resources and infrastructure outside of Ottawa’s chokehold.
If that cannot be achieved by the UCP, then Alberta Independence becomes the only way forward.
The UCP has lost the vision of a Sovereign Alberta and is forced to align itself with a federal vision of joining the EU, resulting in the restrictions of our resources and out-of-control immigration.
I can also foresee carbon taxes on Alberta’s resources, making our products too expensive to export, followed by mass layoffs.
This is Alberta’s future under both UCP and NDP.
May the Lord grant us Divine foresight, wisdom and intervention to save our beautiful and beloved province.
Respectfully,
John F. Huizing
Well said Angela!
We are tired of being betrayed.
And WE are a pretty big percentage of Alberta's conservative movement!
In response to UCP president, Rob Smith’s letter to membership.
@Alberta_UCP
@UCPCaucus
Super easy solution to all of this.
DO WHAT YOU ACTUALLY CAMPAIGNED ON WITH THE MANDATE YOH RECEIVED WHEN WE ELECTED YOU!
Where is the provincial police force?
Why have you not pushed the federal government for that ‘number’ so we can move forward with discussion about a provincial pension? If they won’t give it, move forward anyways.
Why did we have to vote on immigration questions that you already knew the answer to and had a mandate to do?
Why is Alberta not collecting all the taxes yet?
Why is the premier pretending that the 9 bad laws are gone and we can build pipelines to the coast?
Albertans are so very very tired of stupid party games.
Of wondering ‘what happened to Danielle Smith?’
Of holding their noses when they go to vote because we can’t get a leader who actually does what they campaigned on but heaven forbid we have the NDP.
If our leaders won’t do what they campaigned on, what’s the difference? Who cares if we get the NDP if we don’t get the leader and government we actually voted for? At least we know from the get-go that they are compromised and crazy. Rather than dealing with the disappointment of what we have now.
SMH that we’re pretty much back to a Kenney situation. I’ve got tickets to the AGM but don’t know if I want to waste a good weekend supporting more of the charade. A large part of the hope Albertans had for independence was the opportunity to reset the system, get to a place of true democracy, away from party politics, politicians who are only concerned with if they get elected next year and who have zero actual vision for the province past the next election cycle.
We are oh, so very, tired of it all.
Danny Hozack retweeted
SMITH just told everyone that she DID NOT get elected leader of the UCP with the support of Alberta Independence folks…
On top of her recent announcement of how proud she was of a renewed COVID vax program - this is the 4th or 5th batshit crazy thing she’s said this week! 😂
Told all of you!
According to SMITH @CoryBMorgan was NEVER a separatist.
😂😂😂
This is the Smith version of “These are not the droids you are looking for!”
Danny Hozack retweeted
Day 115
The kids were awesome today hiking well over 6 miles in the Smokey Mountains .. heck I was tired
Danny Hozack retweeted
Oh @RonVoss5
Savage, but Fair
Both have blood on their hands
Premier @ABDanielleSmith pushing the deadly "Vax" is truly evil
You really have to hate people to do that
SACK SMITH SAVE LIVES
SACK SMITH SAVE ALBERTA
SACK SMITH SAVE THE PARTY
Danny Hozack retweeted
No surprised at all that smith worked with Tommie the commie.
The dry run non-binding referendum was great for sussing out all the issues that must be resolved before the binding secession referendum.
ALBERTA MEDIA ALERT 🚨
What none of the Media are understanding is how involved Danielle Smith was behind the scenes in manipulating the petition and referendum process.
Prior to the November 2025 AGM Danielle Smith Would text Jeff Rath on a relatively regular basis.
On June 30, 2025 Smith sent a text to Jeff Rath by mistake that was obviously meant for Thomas Lukaszuk.
The text said
“Told you not to submit until the new rules came in. This has to be conducted under the old thresholds”
This text was sent AFTER Lukaszuk had submitted his petition under the old rules and Lukaszuk was already Lobbying to have his petition be permitted to meet the lower signature threshold under the new rules.
Rath responded to Smith by saying that Smith had obviously intended that text for Thomas Lukaszuk.
Smith, obviously flustered tried to lie her way out of it claiming :
“No I meant to send it to you. I told you and Mitch to wait until the new rules came in and it sounds like you did”
The problem with that explanation is that Smith never told Rath anything about waiting until the new rules came in. We were doing it in any event.
The obvious context of this text and the timing of it that Smith was colluding with Lukaszuk to rig the petition process and subsequent referendum against her base in favour of the Forever Canadians.
Of course if what Smith was saying about NOT accidentally sending a text meant for Lukaszuk to Rath (which is less likely) this gives support to what people were saying at the time about Smith being a secret separatist. (which looks even less likely)
The simple fact is that on either formulation - manipulative secret federalist or manipulative secret separatist, SMITH is unelectable.
Understanding who she is as a person, who in their right mind would ever vote for her ever again, on either side of this debate.
Danny Hozack retweeted
Rogue UCP Board?
The reference in Daniele Smith’s loyalty pledge form “that the UCP’s Board of Directors have resolved” indicates that the identified new requirement for election to the UCP Board of Directors came about through a resolution made by the current Board.
Accordingly, the current board, in my view, has clearly overstepped its powers. They are now creating an amendment to the party’s bylaws and rules on the fly without adoption by the members.
Accordingly, the current Board of Directors should resign; certainly those responsible for such behaviour.
Attached is the form from “Rules and Procedures for the Election of the United Conservative Association Board of Directors”, which was prepared for the 2026 AGM.
Danny Hozack retweeted
Alberta Teachers do not have the right to drag children into the harmful identitarian netherworld the ATA inhabits.
Nenshi still cannot name a single fundamental human right that was violated. Not one.
One year ago today, Danielle Smith and the UCP stripped 51,000 teachers of their fundamental human rights.
We’ve heard that the problems they were fighting to fix — underfunding, overcrowding and a lack of support for complexity — have not improved.
The Alberta NDP stands with every educator, parent and student in this province who’s demanding better education.
Danny Hozack retweeted
There are several independence parties!
Please check us out: votewlc.com/
We have a plan to work with other independence parties! 🙂
The UCP are toast.
Will u assist with the @ABRepublicans?
They seem to be the strongest separatist party.
Danny Hozack retweeted
Not so fast.
Section 10.1 of the Alberta Human Rights Act allows for preferential hiring based on race, etc. Bill 33 does not repeal Section 10.1. Instead, the Bill adds a bunch of weasily prohibitions and exceptions for provincial bodies.
If they meant it, they could just repeal section 10.1. And they should have invoked the Notwithstanding Clause (section 33) of the Charter. They haven't, so provincial bodies in Alberta will still be subject to section 15(1) and (2) of the Charter, which allow (and sometimes may require) reverse discrimination.
‼️NUKES FIRED!! --- Alberta just tabled Bill 33 and it NUKES DEI and wokism across the public sector.
The Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2026 (No. 2) bans preferential hiring and promotion based on race, gender identity, sexual orientation, or other “personal characteristics”
in government agencies, schools, universities, municipalities, and Crown entities.
Banned outright:
Ameliorative (DEI) hiring and promotion programs
Mandatory training on DEI, unconscious bias, or cultural competency
Any required training that dictates political, historical, or social opinions or pushes identity-based moral superiority and preferential treatment
Merit is back. Ideological loyalty tests are out.
This is the most BASED law of 2026!
Well said Sir.
Wildrose is still here. Still listening to Albertans.
Please check this out:
Wildrose Loyalty Coalition — Standing Up For Alberta
Nine Thoughts on UCP President Rob Smith’s Remarkable Letter to the Membership.
1. Rob Smith acknowledges Alberta sovereigntists are indispensable to the @Alberta_UCP, among its most dedicated volunteers and organizers. Then he declares @ABDanielleSmith’s leadership beyond question.
Apparently, we can knock on doors, raise money and elect federalists. We simply cannot determine the direction of the party we helped build.
That is not unity. That is political subordination.
2. Albertans voted on a nonbinding referendum on a referendum. They did not vote on Danielle Smith’s leadership.
The 75% who voted to remain in Canada did not grant her immunity from accountability inside her party.
A referendum on Alberta’s constitutional future is not a coronation of Danielle Smith.
3. Janet Brown’s polling found 53% of intended UCP voters supported Option 2, versus 40% favouring Canada.
Rob Smith is confusing the Alberta electorate with the UCP electorate.
We are not some fringe on the periphery. We are the majority constituency within the party, its grassroots, volunteers and rural heartland.
The party cannot treat the people who helped deliver its majorities as political guests in their own home.
4. Rob boasts that 65 constituency association boards passed motions supporting Smith.
“That settles it.”
Does it, Rob?
Did Sixty-five boards really do so?
Would be a pity if one of the sixty-five called for a review.
If Smith enjoys overwhelming member support, why fear a review?
The UCP is supposed to be a democratic institution, not the personal property of whoever happens to lead it.
5. Rob insists sovereigntists are welcome and needed. Danielle Smith invites those still advocating Independence to find another party.
Which is it?
We can volunteer, donate and vote as instructed, but must abandon any ambition to influence party direction?
That is the federalist reservation. We are not going back.
6. Rob invokes the spectre of the NDP and 2015. But if preventing a Nenshi government is paramount, why alienate a substantial portion of your electoral coalition?
Smith apparently believes she can repudiate sovereigntists politically while retaining them electorally.
Voters aren’t party property. The danger in 2027 may be a leader whose former base stays home.
Demanding that disillusioned supporters fall in line is not a strategy for winning an election.
7. Rob recites government achievements as though they settle the leadership question.
They do not. Accomplishments belong to the party, its legislators, its members and Albertans. They are not Danielle Smith’s private property.
The UCP is bigger than one individual. Good government and continued confidence in its leader are separate questions.
8. The UCP emerged from Alberta’s conservative movement, including the Wildrose tradition. It is not Danielle Smith’s personal political vehicle.
Independence advocates have every right to join, contest nominations, elect boards, shape policy and seek the leadership.
The Parti Québécois showed what an institutionalized sovereigntist movement can achieve. Alberta First must learn that lesson.
We intend to participate fully in determining its future.
9. We lost the October referendum. We accept it. But more than half a million Albertans voted to begin a process toward a binding Independence referendum.
That is no extinct movement. It has a rural heartland, a political network and a future.
Rob says it will take ALL OF US to win in 2027. He’s right.
So why marginalize the very people you need?
You cannot demand our labour while dismissing our convictions. You cannot order unity into existence, or declare a leadership question settled by a referendum that never asked it.
Alberta First is not going back to the federalist reservation.
The real danger is leadership that no longer understands its own electorate, and an establishment that mistakes voters’ silence for consent.
