Prayer saves. RVLD - Trading indicators, automation, actionable research (based) Top 0.53% of Polymarket uers. $QUBIC
Perth, Australia
Joined December 2022
- Tweets19.6K
- Following2K
- Followers482
- Likes109K
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
Perhaps before the debate on 14th December, some MPs might like to try avoiding folic acid in their diet for a week.
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
"When you're deficient in calcium, you load up on whatever junk metal happens to be around.” — Ray Peat
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
You don't have to be strong all by yourself today.
Ask God for help. He gives it freely.
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
Read the most comprehensive paper to date examining the link between mRNA “vaccines” and cancer: zenodo.org/records/22282111
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
The chart plots how many days ago Bitcoin last traded at today's price, which currently sits near the top of its historical range at roughly 2.5 to 3 years back. This points to a price level far above where BTC has traded for most of its history, a pattern the chart associates with past cycle peaks rather than a fresh move higher.
$BTC #BTC #BTC #ETF
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
@Waitrose has closed the door on a customer trying to avoid synthetic folic acid.
After weeks of correspondence (Case 19308882) they wrote:
“Please refer to my email on 20/10, where I advised that we are unable to assist you further on this matter, as all available information has already been shared. Please note that while any further correspondence will be logged on your file, it may not be responded to.”
One slice of fortified bread is fine. Ordinary daily intake of bread + cereal + pie/pastry + biscuits easily exceeds 300–450 μg — well over the 200 μg level previously advised for over-50s because of B12-masking risk.
A substantial part of Waitrose’s core customer base is over 50. They have no system to identify folic-acid-free products and no plan to warn customers about cumulative exposure.
@ClareCraigPath has highlighted the issues with unmetabolised folic acid and the limits of the safety data. Retailers following the mandate still have a duty to consider cumulative effects under the Food Safety Act.
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
Gov has made it almost impossible to avoid folic acid.
Manufacturers and retailers are not helping either @waitrose
What are people with cancer, heart stents, B12 deficiency and those who don't want an increased risk of cancer meant to do?
@Waitrose has closed the door on a customer trying to avoid synthetic folic acid.
After weeks of correspondence (Case 19308882) they wrote:
“Please refer to my email on 20/10, where I advised that we are unable to assist you further on this matter, as all available information has already been shared. Please note that while any further correspondence will be logged on your file, it may not be responded to.”
One slice of fortified bread is fine. Ordinary daily intake of bread + cereal + pie/pastry + biscuits easily exceeds 300–450 μg — well over the 200 μg level previously advised for over-50s because of B12-masking risk.
A substantial part of Waitrose’s core customer base is over 50. They have no system to identify folic-acid-free products and no plan to warn customers about cumulative exposure.
@ClareCraigPath has highlighted the issues with unmetabolised folic acid and the limits of the safety data. Retailers following the mandate still have a duty to consider cumulative effects under the Food Safety Act.
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
Being worried about the far right while the county has 250,000 raped girls is an absolutely monumental moment of betrayal.
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
Wow. “In 2026, EVERY SINGLE STATEWIDE CANDIDATE obtained more raw votes than Kamala Harris.”
I ran the numbers.
With the exception of Ken Paxton*, Texas Republican midterm statewide candidates slightly outperformed historical expectations.
Democrats UNPRECEDENTEDLY outperformed them.
Prior to 2026, it was rare for a statewide race candidate to outperform the presidential candidate of two years prior.
In 2026, EVERY SINGLE STATEWIDE CANDIDATE obtained more raw votes than Kamala Harris.
This has never happened before.
Methods.
I asked: What average % of the presidential vote does each Texas statewide race candidate get in the midterms, for each party?
Then I compared what each candidate was expected to get, based on historical trends since 1992**, to what they actually got in 2026.
The present figure is after adjusting for which party had a president in office; midterm turnout is on average higher for parties who lost the presidency.
The unadjusted version is in the next, threaded post, for completeness.
* Paxton would have lost even if he had performed at slightly above historical expectation, as other Republican candidates had, as you can see in the right-hand figure.
** Texas and national politics worked very differently before the 1990s, with many conservatives voting Republican for president and Democrat for state office. They are not comparable.
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
If all white people are responsible for slavery, all Black people are responsible for Black crime. It simply can't be true that one of these theses is true but not the other.
In reality, of course, neither is.
RVLD Indra ױ retweeted
It hurts thinking about how the left basically murdered Charlie Kirk with absolutely no repercussions.
