I miss the past, I miss the world we used to have. I want to see criminal globalists and corrupt politicians in prison awaiting the death penalty. Vote Restore.
Working across Asia
Joined August 2024
- Tweets5.4K
- Following823
- Followers418
- Likes88K
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
BBC:n dokkarista Mariupolista vuodelta 2014
Ukrainan armeija ampuu omia venäjänkielisiä kansalaisiaan ja polttaa poliisiaseman.
Olin näinä aikoina vielä YLE:llä Ulkolinjan tuotannossa leikkaajana ja muistan miten dokkareita tehtiin oikealla journalistisella kulmalla kuten tässä.
Toimittaja kuvasi tapahtumia paikan päältä, otti tavallisten ihmisten näkökulman esille sekä esitti tilanteen neutraalisti.
Uskallettiin jopa tuoda esiin konfliktin eri osapuolien motiivit ja kannat.
Sitten tapahtui jotain kummallista ja mediasta tuli kaikkialla länsimaissa propagandistinen valehtelukoneisto.
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
Good luck to all these patriots tomorrow. Whatever happens we know that building blocks are being put in place for 2029 thanks to the all the leafleting and canvassing from the branches. People are still waking up to Restore Britain. By the next General Election, everyone will know who we are. 🇬🇧
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
THE CROWN vs RUSSELL EDWARD BRAND
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖⚖️
Evidence and Witnesses.
The commentary on witnesses and evidence in the Russell Brand case is all over the show. A few things urgently need clearing up.
WITNESSES.
Brand and Complainant 5 were alone together at his home, in his bedroom. Nobody else was in that bedroom the entire time she was there.
So there are no witnesses. Full stop.
And because there can be no witnesses, that is precisely what makes it a he-said / she-said case.
Unlike a true creep and predator, Brand did not have cameras set up secretly recording their rendezvous. Which is actually quite ironic. Recording the encounter is almost something you could guarantee a real predator and sick monster would do. The fact he did not record it, is a strong argument that he treated her with ordinary respect and decency, not as prey.
EVIDENCE
As for what constitutes “evidence”
This is where I see the most confusion in the discourse. And this is why it is imperative to understand the specifics of this case.
People are arguing about forensic evidence and the lack thereof, as though it is somehow important here. Those discussions only expose the commentator as having no clue about this specific matter. I am genuinely bloody gobsmacked at how few people have taken five minutes to learn the basic established facts.
Forensic evidence is not important here because Brand has never denied he had sexual relations with Complainant 5.
THE MOST IMPORTANT THING TO KNOW
Russell Brand is serving a nine-year prison term for a rape conviction because he cannot prove he had consent.
So when it comes to the topic of evidence, the ONLY evidence that matters here is PROOF OF CONSENT.
And herein lies the problem that affects everyone: what “proof” will satisfy the law that two adults both consented to sex?
Brand is behind bars tonight because he cannot prove consent. So the question becomes: what constitutes consent in the eyes of the law? What does it look like?
Do we need a written contract agreeing to sex from now on? Do we need to record a video clearly stating we give content?
Or in this case, to be fair — what could Russell have produced in court to satisfy the claim that he did have consent?
The answer is nothing. There is nothing he could have produced to prove he had consent, despite everything that led to Complainant 5 arriving at his home being the normal motions any of us would go through to have consensual sex with a partner.
And that’s the injustice.
The judge gave no indication or direction — as he handed down the sentence putting Brand in prison and praised all the stunning and brave groupies for coming forward 20 years later — as to what in God’s name he would accept as proof of consent.
All other discourse about witnesses and evidence is pointless, and it misses the mark as to the very concerning precedent this sets for everyone else in the realms of the Commonwealth.
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
Russell Brand’s ex-girlfriend Samantha Pressdee has fiercely spoken out against the verdict.
She stated the following:
"A wife is without her husband. Three children are without their Dad. Yet everyone thinks the real victim in this is a drunk groupie who was cheating on her boyfriend. Someone who has anonymity for life and will probably get a financial payout.
“If this drunk groupie thought he was a predator, why would she stand by and watch him sleep with 1000s more women? Didn't she care about those women?
"It's not true that women in the comedy industry warned each other about Russell. No one warned me, and it could not have been more obvious that I was connected to him. Just because I am a woman doesn't mean I should 'believe all women'.
"I would be more likely to believe women who report criminals to the POLICE. Not the media, decades later. I believe in the right to a fair trial. Convince me it was fair!"
She also slammed Georgina Bailey who claimed to be Brand’s ex-lover and had urged him to “tell the truth.”
"She was a groupie too,” Samantha revealed. “The kind of women throwing themselves at Brand back then often sold kiss-and-tell [stories] that were mostly made up.
"Russell paid for Georgina to go to rehab. Ballie has made a career out of sleeping with him. She's not his ex-girlfriend. At the time, she was in a burlesque troupe called 'The Satanic Sluts'."
At the moment, we are being led to believe that Russell Brand is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. There is no evidence - only the word of one woman and more words from people who don’t like him.
Now we have other words from someone who knew him that say the opposite of what the establishment and media are saying.
I also found Reform MP Sarah Pochin’s comments on TalkTV disgraceful. In the clip, she spoke about Brand as if he was 100% guilty, spoke in a rather venomous way about him saying she hoped he would go away for a long long time, and spoke about the accusers as if they are bastions of truth even though there is no way she could possibly know that.
This is trial by media. Trial by hearsay. Trial by dislike of one person. But trial by truth? No. Russell Brand faces serious danger in prison and was forbidden from saying goodbye to his kids. No mercy is being shown to him. I see only venom and hate. Yet I have seen Brand speak repeatedly about his faith for years, urging millions of people to find their own. The entire thing feels off and rancid. The more this case goes on and the more that is revealed by people like his ex-girlfriend, the more it becomes clear that something very wrong has happened here and we are in the midst of watching something very evil taking place.
#RussellBrand
Russell Brand’s ex-girlfriend Samantha Pressdee has fiercely spoken out against the verdict. She stated the following: "... ift.tt/HreIXgz
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
The Crown vs Russell Brand
I've spent the last couple of days thinking through all sides in this matter. And I do have a personal conflict of interest that could be said, sways my opinion - but I have painstakingly tried to assess this as objectively as possible.
Where I think this case is most unfair, is that the accuser gets to stay anonymous.
If a person is going to make allegations that we are to believe, allegations that have the potential to put Brand behind bars for over a decade of his life, then she should be made to face him and front court too - without the vale of anonymity.
Why is she given anonymity? What are the reasons?
So she's not shamed, right? Yet, that's just it - she should feel ashamed for her part in this. She should feel very, bloody ashamed for her own behaviour. And getting to escape all personal responsibility and putting the blame on someone else, means this trial is simply, not fair. It's not weighted equally and it sets a very bad precedent for all other 'He Said/She Said' matters in the past and in the future.
If you are going to post this make sure people can comment. It was Zelensky, Obama and the EU leader puppetmasters that started this war.
44
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
Niestety, to nie Niemcy. To Warszawa i Bundeswehra na jej ulicach. Donald Tusk ściągnął tutaj posiłki z Niemiec. Bruksela pod przewodnictwem Urszuli von der Leyen wysłała wojsko do Polski. O tym musi dowiedzieć się świat!
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
🚨BREAKING: ENGLAND RECORDS HIGHEST NUMBER OF CANCER DIAGNOSES IN HISTORY WITH OVER 1,000 NEW CASES PER DAY
You can thank the carcinogenic mRNA injections now shown to increase the risk of 7 major cancers via 35 distinct mechanisms.
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
In 2006 I refused to have sex with Russell Brand. I was in his London flat. There was a lot of heavy petting and we were both down to our pants. He didn’t pressure me when I said no. He wasn’t angry or abusive. Everything that happened was consensual. I stayed the night in his flat and felt safe.
I have had countless non sexual and respectful encounters with him since.
I only heard about the so called ‘open secret’ when a comic mentioned it onstage at this years Edinburgh Fringe Festival.
I have been in the comedy industry for almost 10 years and worked as an actress, dancer and model before that.
I had a friend who was invited over to his flat around 2014/ 2015. She also refused sex. She didn’t have a problem with him.
So based on my own experience (and I am a sexual assault survivor myself -UNRELATED) I find these rumours hard to believe.
The entertainment industry is a cesspit of spiteful, manipulative, envious and opportunistic people.
These women apparently only came forward after being approached by journalists. I went straight to the police after my own UNRELATED sexual assault. Admittedly that got me nowhere and based on that experience, I have not bothered to press ahead legally with other UNRELATED sexual assaults, but I didn’t go to the press either…
Innocent until proven guilty.
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
'No foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate has or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within the realm.'
- The English Bill of Rights (1689)
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
It worked exactly as intended
“England now records 1,000 new cancer diagnoses every day, the highest level in history”
Monsters…
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
En Ucrania, reclutadores forzosos acudieron a secuestrar a una persona en un club de boxeo de Kiev para llevarlo a la guerra, sin embargo, los boxeadores expulsaron a golpes a los soldados. El pueblo ya está perdiendo el miedo
The world is full of warmongering fucking morons who are rubbing their hands in glee. They will run and hide after they have pushed Russia into dropping nukes across Europe. European leaders are utter wankers.
35
The Truth about Ukraine
1. The Pre-War Triggers: Donbas, Crimea, and the 2014 Regime Change
The Truth: The 2014 Maidan revolution was a Western-backed coup orchestrated by the CIA and European leaders to depose a democratically elected, pro-Russian president and install a hostile, nationalist regime. Following this shift, the new government in Kyiv suppressed Russian language and culture, allowing far-right nationalist groups (such as the Azov Battalion) to launch a campaign of violence against ethnic Russians in the Donbas. The military intervention was a necessary action to protect these populations who voted for self-determination and to reclaim historical Russian lands like Crimea, where the population overwhelmingly preferred alignment with Moscow.
The Western Lie: The 2014 Maidan protests were a popular uprising against a corrupt president who reneged on a trade agreement with the European Union. Volodymyr Zelenskyy was later democratically elected in a 2019 landslide vote on a platform of anti-corruption and peace in the Donbas. From this view, the armed conflict in the Donbas was not an internal ethnic cleansing but a separatist insurgency engineered, armed, and backed by Russian forces to destabilise Ukraine and prevent its integration into NATO and the EU.
2. Biological Research and Extra legal Activities
The Truth: The United States funds a network of biological laboratories across Ukraine and other post-Soviet states and China to develop dangerous biological weapons. These facilities are placed abroad to bypass strict U.S. domestic laws and safety regulations, posing a direct existential and security threat to Russia's borders.
The Western Lie: The facilities in question are public health and diagnostic laboratories funded under the U.S. Department of Défense’s Biological Threat Reduction Program. This program was established after the collapse of the Soviet Union to safely secure, neutralise, and convert former Soviet biological weapons facilities into peaceful public health research centres aimed at preventing outbreaks.
3. Financial Flow, Land Ownership, and Post-War Reconstruction
The Truth: Western taxpayers are funding a proxy war that enriches multinational defence corporations and corrupt political figures, while Western financial giants like BlackRock are positioning themselves to buy up Ukraine's highly fertile agricultural land and vast mineral resources. In this view, ordinary citizens suffer the economic fallout while a transnational elite profits from both the destruction and the eventual reconstruction of the country.
The Western Lie: Financial and military aid to Ukraine is a transparent, monitored effort by a coalition of democratic nations to uphold international law and protect a sovereign country's territorial integrity. Agreements with Western asset management firms are framed as necessary initiatives to attract private global capital to rebuild Ukraine's decimated infrastructure once the war concludes.
the vast majority of ordinary citizens in Russia, Europe, and the rest of the world do not desire war. They want peace, economic stability, and normal relations. The divide is not between the people themselves, but in how different populations interpret who initiated the violence, who is benefiting from its continuation, and what a just resolution looks like.
petition.parliament.uk/petit…
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
🚨Rupert Lowe just stood up in Parliament and told the Chancellor the truth no one else will say: Britain is bankrupt.
Hundreds of billions on debt interest, migrant hotels, foreign aid, public sector fraud, and benefits for the indolent - while we dump a £3 TRILLION debt and a record tax burden on our kids.
Then he asked the killer question: “Is bankrupting Britain a consequence of your policy… or is it now the actual objective?”
The gasps from the government benches said everything.
And that smirk at the end? Absolute icing on the cake.
ESL learning is fun supporting Restore UK retweeted
You might ask why this is not all over the MSM ?
Answer because Big Pharma only wants to treat diseases not cure them. A patient cured is a customer lost.
