MilitaryFamily UNinfluenced by influencers Uphold Constitution eligibility reqmt naturalborncitizen USborn to UScitizen parents Block Foreign Country Followers
Florida, USA
Joined December 2025
- Tweets30K
- Following113
- Followers479
- Likes36.7K
Pinned Tweet
"Now as to the correct definition of a “natural born Citizen,” A “natural born Citizen” is a child born in a country to parents who were its “citizens” at the time of the child’s birth. This is the settled definition of the clause under American national common law. See Emer de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Section 212 Citizens and natives (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatel 1758) (“The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens”); The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253, 289 (1814) (C.J. Marshall concurring); Inglis v. Sailors’ Snug Harbor, 28 U.S. 99 (1830); Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242, 245 (1830; Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 476-77 (1857) (J. Daniels concurring); Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168-170 (1875); Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F.Cas. 582, 5 Dill. 394, No. 11,719 (C.C.W.D.Ark 1879); United States v. Ward, 42 F.320 (C.C.S.D.Cal. 1890); United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 679-80 (1898) (all confirmed Vattel’s Section 212 of The Law of Nations (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatel 1758) definition of the “natural-born citizens” who “are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens”). This is the only definition of the clause that has ever existed in the U.S. and which has been recognized by our U.S. Supreme Court. The two conditions of being born in the country to “citizen” parents are both necessary and sufficient conditions of being a “natural born Citizen.” The definition of a “natural born Citizen” therefore excludes anyone who was not born in the country (or its jurisdictional equivalent) or not born to parents (both parents) who were its “citizens” (at birth or after birth) at the time of the child’s birth or both."
Patriotress2 retweeted
You know what you call a retired Major? Dick, that is what you call him. You retired, you are no longer in the military, let it go Elsa.
Patriotress2 retweeted
Remember what I was telling you right before the election.
Trump ALREADY knew exactly how they would cheat.
It was definitely algorithms in the machines but they ALSO needed a massive INCREASE in voter registrations.
The DOJ lawsuit in California EXPOSED how the democrats were going to cheat.
A massive INCREASE in voter registrations that did not “require” proof of citizenship.
Trump purposely started a court fight over 20,000 “noncitizens” voting in California, knowing that the number of “noncitizens” voting is much larger in California and across the country.
Trump knew the courts likely wouldn’t do anything to “stop” it BEFORE the election.
Most people took that as a loss in the courts, but it was a huge victory.
That decision was exactly what Trump wanted.
The democrats needed to “commit” the crime and the most important part of that lawsuit, was the Ninth Circuit slapping down the lower court, which was trying to prevent prosecution of election officials for breaking federal law.
The Ninth Circuit cleared the judicial branch out of the way because it is the Executive Branch’s Constitutional authority to “prosecute” federal crimes.
Courts can’t prevent the Executive Branch from enforcing federal laws.
That lawsuit set the table, to expose and overturn the ENTIRE election nationwide.
The democrats didn’t massively increase their voter registrations with illegals, they did it with “noncitizens” who are in the country “legally.”
Either visa, green card or temporary status immigrants.
That’s a huge number and they showed up for democrats because Trump is ALREADY in the process of deporting most of them.
But guess what?
It’s illegal for ALL “noncitizens” to vote in federal elections.
And Trump ALREADY has the full federal database of “noncitizens” with legal standing to compare to the voter registration totals and ballots.
Checkmate!
The 2022-2024 43 state updated number of "New Registered Voters" registered WITHOUT proof of U.S. citizenship raises from 20,283,937...
To a STAGGERING 24,662,998 new registered voters registered without proof of U.S. citizenship.
Democrats coincidentally gained over 20 MILLION new voters within the same time period, while Republicans gained over a million new voters.
This tells you everything you need to know.
Patriotress2 retweeted
SECRETARY RUBIO: I think the president took on something that other presidents have failed to do. Sometimes, when you do the right thing, you don't know whether it's popular or not, but it's still the right thing to do. Presidents are elected to take on the hard things, sometimes difficult things, but necessary things.
Patriotress2 retweeted
From accounts of several of my close friends serving in the administration, the PPO was the point of strangulation that @SusieWiles47 was maintaining...
Personnel is policy and Wiles was working to make the @realDonaldTrump agenda fail...
Patriotress2 retweeted
Are you upset that you couldn't get @dow to pay for your bottom surgery to become fully trans?
Patriotress2 retweeted
Exactly. I saw your original post. Now ... where are @AGToddBlanche @FBIDirectorKash and others on this anomaly?
Patriotress2 retweeted
Yeah, I didn’t think I’d have to add watermarks. Shoulda known better. Thought we had more honorable people on our side.
But yes, I’m glad the information is getting out there. That’s the most important part. I would not not want Kevin to have shared this and for it to not have gone viral at the end of the day. But I’m saying @kevinnbass should have known better to give credit where it’s due and not pretend like he came up with the info on his own.
Patriotress2 retweeted
Proof:
🚨 Another red flag is showing up in the midterm election results:
They are LYING to us when they say republicans didn’t show up to vote. The numbers prove republicans not only voted like they normally do, but actually gained more voters than previous midterms.
2022 vs 2026 House vote totals (projected):
Republicans
In 2022: 54.2M
in 2026: ~55.6M. That’s a 1.4 million gain.
Democrats
2022: 51.3M
2026: ~70M. That’s a 19 million gain.
Republicans showed up at basically the same level they always do in midterms and actually a bit higher. So it has nothing to do with republicans not showing up to vote.
The difference this year is that Democrats added roughly 19 million more votes than they got in 2022, closer to presidential-year levels as if Kamala was on the ballot. Where the heck did they get that many votes from? Biden’s 20 million he let in at the border?
That’s the story. Not “Republicans sat out.”
In the chart below, notice how the blue trend line is sporadic almost like they were both attempts to stop Trump, while the red trend line has a natural growth?
(Total vote projections are based on the remaining ballots holding their current Democrat to Republican ratios of 55% to 43.5%).
Patriotress2 retweeted
I was not expecting the response to this post that I got. Just goes to show there are a lot of honest people out there.
Thank you for the support.
I just want to say that I’m sorry if it appears like I’m making this about me and chasing clout.
The important thing is that the message got out there and if Kevin did not share it, then it would not have gone viral. So for that I am grateful.
I only wanted to set the record straight once and let it go because getting credit is not what this is about. Saving this country is what the mission is and that’s where the focus should be.
LOCKED IN.
For the record, I am the one who found this anomaly, not @kevinnbass. The 2026 projections at 54.6M and 70.4M were made up by me based on the given data at the time the graph was made. Not a single other agency or news outlet were reporting those projections. I came up with them. The real numbers have changed slightly and it looks like democrats will end up with about 67-69M total.
But Kevin and others stole my research without giving me the credit. I’m all for getting then information out there, but bigger accounts like Kevin are responsible enough to know better.
Either way, the most important thing is getting the message out there and for that I am grateful to President, @realDonaldTrump @POTUS
Patriotress2 retweeted
For the record, I am the one who found this anomaly, not @kevinnbass. The 2026 projections at 54.6M and 70.4M were made up by me based on the given data at the time the graph was made. Not a single other agency or news outlet were reporting those projections. I came up with them. The real numbers have changed slightly and it looks like democrats will end up with about 67-69M total.
But Kevin and others stole my research without giving me the credit. I’m all for getting then information out there, but bigger accounts like Kevin are responsible enough to know better.
Either way, the most important thing is getting the message out there and for that I am grateful to President, @realDonaldTrump @POTUS
Patriotress2 retweeted
McConnell still can’t speak when asked about the blue wave. Vegetable RINO holding a seat while the numbers don’t add up. Audit the ballots.
Patriotress2 retweeted
KANSAS: THE 15% GAP, COUNTY BY COUNTY
The 15% gap held across the Senate map. Here’s Kansas, all 105 counties. 94% of counties fell within range: 99 of the 105.
Below the formula: Seward, Ford, Finney. Meatpacking counties in southwest Kansas.
Above the formula: Wallace, Sheridan, Jewell. Three of the reddest ranch counties in the state, about 90% Trump.
What the formula tells us: If a county is below the formula, the proportion of Democrats to Republicans who voted was higher than in 2024. If it’s above the formula, the proportion of Republicans to Democrats was higher than in 2024.
Why this matters:
This isn’t a statewide average hiding the normal county to county variation underneath. The same 15% shows up in counties with hundreds of voters and counties with hundreds of thousands of voters. The few that break from it break in predictable directions.
One rule works at the state level and the county level. That’s not what scattered voter decisions usually look like.
Patriotress2 retweeted
TEXAS: THE 15% GAP, COUNTY BY COUNTY
The 15% gap held across the Senate map. Here’s Texas, all 254 counties. 97% of counties fell within range: 246 of the 254.
Below the formula: Starr, Zapata, Maverick, Webb, Hidalgo, Cameron, Duval, Jim Hogg. Border counties along the Rio Grande.
What the formula tells us: If a county is below the formula, the proportion of Democrats to Republicans who voted 🗳️ in that specific county was higher than in 2024. If it’s above the formula, the proportion of Republicans to Democrats was higher than in 2024.
Why this matters:
This isn’t a statewide average hiding the normal county-to-county variation underneath. The same 15% shows up in counties with dozens of voters and counties with more than a million. The few that break from it break in predictable directions.
One rule works at the state level and the county level. That’s not what scattered voter decisions usually look like.
Patriotress2 retweeted
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
Patriotress2 retweeted
This wasn’t supposed to happen.
Trump was supposed to take the blame for the massive loss in the election and change his policies, in order to give the republicans any chance of winning the 2028 presidential election.
Instead, Trump just upped the ante and doubled down.
That wasn’t supposed to happen.
Trump just promoted one of the main “architects” of all the policies that the enemy hate.
They hate Stephen Miller almost as much as they hate Trump.
Stephen Miller will accelerate the policies that the media says, he needs to change.
This isn’t about politics.
The media and the fake MAGA influencers are completely ignoring all the “obvious” evidence of election FRAUD, just like in 2020.
Even though the evidence this time, is far worse than 2020 and it’s “nationwide.”
Their problem this time, is Elon bought Twitter.
They can’t silence and censor the “evidence” out of the public narrative.
The FRAUD gets more “obvious” with each passing day.
The media is ignoring the “evidence” completely and desperately trying to focus on the presidential election and division on “politics” as a distraction.
Meanwhile, Trump is preparing for WAR.
This has never been about politics.
It’s about defeating and removing an enemy insurgency within our government and their allies in the media.
Enemy of the people.
Trump remains completely “calm.”
He’s not panicked about the election loss at all.
Only the “politicians” are. Only the people, who don’t acknowledge or realize that we are engaged in a real WAR against an enemy insurgency.
And the majority of the American people support Trump and ALWAYS have, regardless of what the FAKE POLLS and the media say.
For ten years, Trump has talked nonstop about democrats stealing elections and then suddenly, after the biggest theft in history, he’s not talking about it.
Why?
The “calm” before the storm.
Trump knows what is coming.
So does Stephen Miller.
Trump is now positioning Miller on the chessboard and is sending a clear message to anybody paying attention.
Stephen Miller is a “warrior,” who doesn’t fear the enemy at all.
They fear him.
Listen to what Stephen Miller says at the beginning.
“The storm whispers to the warrior.”
Trump is the STORM and when asked, he told the media years ago, that they “would find out.”
The democrats are celebrating a blue “tsunami” election.
But it was “rigged” for red.
———-
Q drop
3891
Mar 09, 2020 1:05:42 PM EDT
Nothing can stop what is coming.
Nothing!
Rig for RED.
Q
———-
What’s coming?
The much anticipated STORM.
————
Q drop
2494
Nov 20, 2018 9:42:33 PM EST
[D]ec 5
D5
NOTHING CAN STOP what is coming.
Nothing.
This election was not about fixing the economy, trade, borders, military, protecting our children etc. all so another corrupt politician or 'insider' can simply undo it [band-aid].
This was not simply another 4-year election, but, a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not, WE, THE PEOPLE, reclaim control over our gov't.
youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXaf…
Panic in DC.
Q
———-
Does anyone really think Trump will allow the democrats to steal the election and then imprison him, his family and anybody else associated with him?
Only fools or the enemy believe that.
This moment in history has long been planned for.
Trump is completely “calm” because he knows what’s coming.
By appointing his greatest “warrior” to lead the White House and focus them on the coming fight, Trump has now prepped the battlefield to FINALLY expose the fraudulent election system and “trigger” the upcoming PROSECUTION PHASE.
The STORM just whispered to his fearless WARRIOR, “ It’s now GO TIME.”
Buckle up!
Patriotress2 retweeted
None of those are powers granted to the federal govt in Art 1 Sec 8.
Patriotress2 retweeted
All true. It’s so disheartening that Federal Laws are broken and ignored, the ones our founding fathers actually hanged Americans for treason, it’s in the Constitution that acts of treason are punishable by death.
Just think for a moment, if only Constitutional law had been applied Obama would not have been president. He was the first president known to not be a natural born citizen, a requirement for president.
NBC
American born, of Americans.
The term Natural Born Citizen has been used since our beginnings. Its definition is found in the writings of the framers of our Constitution, in the minutes of our Congressional Record, and in the discussions by our Supreme Court Justices in cases concerning citizenship/immigration/naturalization: “born in the country of parents who are its citizens”. Thus, it requires 3 things, any one of which can make a person a “citizen”, but all 3 are necessary for Natural Born Citizen status:
1) born in the US
2) born to a US citizen father
3) born to a US citizen mother
(Note: the parents can be naturalized US citizens, but they must have naturalized BEFORE the birth of the child, or else it would be born to foreign citizen parents and not meet the requirement)
All others are Naturalized citizens. They became citizens through our laws/statutes found in the 14th amendment (which IS a “law”), or our US Code for Naturalization, created by Congress. Examples below:
-Some may have gone through the naturalization process as adults.
-Others may have become “derivative” citizens, having been granted citizen status as a child when a parent naturalized (they do NOT have to go through the naturalization process).
-Others may have been granted citizenship at birth, having been born anywhere in the world to at least one US citizen parent (they also do NOT have to go through the naturalization process).
-Anyone who has to point to a law or statute to show why he is even a “citizen” has been “naturalized” by that law or statute (the Supreme Court calls it “statutory naturalization” and states that few of our citizens understand the concept!) has just PROVEN he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen.
Here is an easy way to understand it.
What other country can claim a Natural Born Citizen as its own?
-No country can claim the person through birth there, because it was born HERE. Jus solis.
-No country can claim a person through a parent who is that country’s citizen, because the parents were citizens of THIS country. Jus sanguinis.
The US requires BOTH Jus solis and Jus sanguinis for Natural Born Citizen status.