Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson) header
Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson) profile picture

Gray Champion Appreciator

Joined April 2023
Photo by Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson)Photo by Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson)Photo by Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson)Photo by Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson)Photo by Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson)Photo by Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson)Photo by Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson)Photo by Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson)Photo by Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson)Photo by Greg_Alexson (@Greg_Alexson)
Leftists prepping for revolution.
🚨🚨 THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER 🚨 I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it. I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on 𝕏 - feel free to distribute. Here's the primer: USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG. Officially, DRG administered "democracy assistance." They'd go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building. You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID's democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more. Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn't stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself. This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the "4 B's" framework. Block - use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong - control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening. In their own words: "We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment." - Danielle Reiff, DRG lead. Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself. DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a "huge galaxy": lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members. Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth's project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country's populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins. The UDA is very "hush-hush." They have no website, no roster, no filings. Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff. In the words of Reiff/DRG: "So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone's already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan." Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress." Running the UDA's Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They're turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond. The NSL4A's lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it's them, on tape. Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they're saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries' governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after. Who decides when your government is legitimate?
2
55
BWAH, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Ok, "Tyrone". BWAH, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
2
90
This moron, @daGodBrand , is too stupid to realize I insulted the guy who insulted him, then cracked off some racism and blocked my like the little pussy he is.
2
60
Another banger from the Mack!
Did you just make that from scratch?
2
32
Greg_Alexson retweeted
This is revolting pro-cartel pro-trafficking propaganda from the New York Times. The Biden Administration trafficked almost half a million minors into the country and handed them over to unvetted adults, often unvetted adult illegal alien men. Some so-called “sponsors” were delivered numerous, even dozens, of children by the Democrat administration. The majority of the sponsors had themselves paid the cartels to obtain the children, a fact known by the Biden government. Biden spent billions ferrying these children throughout the United States and hiring lawyers to protect cartel profits by filing frivolous motions to keep the floodgates open—funneling the money through corrupt NGOs. The children then disappeared. The Trump Administration rescued these children and is working with consulates and embassies across the globe to reunite them with their families back home. On the Southwest Border, the child trafficking industry has been shut down and, when cartels do try to traffic children, we rescue them and help them find their families in their own countries. The New York Times and its propagandists object to all this and think we should go back to the Biden Policy of mass trafficking children for cartels and terrorists.
“A 7-year-old agreed to voluntarily leave the country without a lawyer present to explain the legal consequences of the decision. In Arizona, an immigration judge ordered a 1-year-old baby appearing without a lawyer to file an asylum application.” nytimes.com/2026/10/15/us/la…
595
5,897
145
23,176
254,949
That's an allusion to an unfounded belief, not a chain of logic. How does you holding that belief bear on whether finding it amusing that one Presidential candidate donned the campaign hat of his opponent makes commentary on an admitted child rapist "wild"? @Liberallionn
Oh you know, the whole Trump protecting pedophiles thing, but you already knew that.
1
1
60
Greg_Alexson retweeted
The Champ @MikeTyson is in the house! No ears were safe!
995
1,628
119
16,880
288,353
A banger!
Emily Youcis My Friend Dario The Slop Cannon Vitalic Starring @DarioAmodei @JensenHuang @pmarca By Emily Youcis 2026
1
5
512
Absolute corruption.
I have just completed what I believe to be the most comprehensive evaluation of Charlotte NC arrest records in history. This project has taken me 3 months to complete, combing through over 50,000+ arrest records and mugshots. I've found what appears to be massive fraud. Thousands of Hispanics have been labelled as "WHITE CAUCASIAN" in the arrest records... THOUSANDS. In fact, I found over 500 cases where Hispanics who were arrested more than once... had their "Ethnicity" CHANGED from "Hispanic" to "Caucasian" from one arrest to another. Horrifyingly, I found HUNDREDS of these "White Caucasians" were actually ILLEGAL ALIENS from foreign countries with ICE detainers. Perhaps most disturbing... Many of the illegal aliens who were labelled as "WHITE CAUCASIAN" had already been released back into the public, DESPITE the ICE detainer requesting they stay in prison. We have a serious problem.
24
Quality!
Someone To Watch Over Me Official Submission for Lumara Film Festival By Emily Youcis 2026
1
7
888
Never misses! @harrymack
I got to freestyle for @McConaughey and @WoodyHarrelson for their new show Brothers on @appletv #AppleTVPartner
1
66
Greg_Alexson retweeted
A landmark Finnish study has found a sharp rise in psychiatric illness among adolescents following sex-alteration procedures. The peer-reviewed study, published in Acta Paediatrica, tracked every young person under 23 who contacted Finland's gender clinics between 1996 and 2019. A total 2,083 individuals were studied, with 16,643 matched controls. They were followed for up to 25 years. Finland's health registers are mandatory, which means no one opts out — this is the complete national picture. The numbers: psychiatric morbidity rose from 9.8% to 60.7% in adolescents who underwent feminising reassignment, and from 21.6% to 54.5% in masculinising reassignment. Even after adjusting for prior psychiatric history, gender-referred adolescents faced five times the risk of male population controls, and three times the risk of female controls. "Psychiatric needs do not subside after medical gender reassignment," the authors concluded. Referrals after 2010 arrived sicker. 47.9% had already needed psychiatric treatment before their first clinic visit, against 15.3% among controls. The authors' read: for some adolescents, gender distress may be secondary to other mental health challenges. The evidence keeps mounting. The silencing continues anyway. How many more adolescents will be told this is "care"?
1,206
10,150
1,596
35,520
7,015,771
Ah, fuck you. If the video featured Quint Kessenich we'd still laugh and you'd have no issue with it. Fucking hypocrite.
Imagine Holly Rowe’s face in that despicable AI video was your daughter’s. Your wife’s. Your sister’s. Still funny? This is gross on so many levels. And no, this isn’t people being “too sensitive” or “easily offended.” Joking about this in a room full of media members and seeing everyone laugh like this? Shame on you. A woman being hit isn’t a punchline. Tell that to a domestic violence survivor. Sickening. Holly Rowe is a phenomenal reporter who has spent decades earning respect in this industry. Some things just aren’t funny.
1
85
Charlie was a good one.
Charlie Kirk accomplished more in 31 years than most people can ever say they achieved in a lifetime. The left sadistically celebrates his murder for one reason and one reason only— because he was effective. His success in speaking to a generation was one of the biggest threats to their marxist revolution. People who've neither built or created anything of value, nor have had an original thought in their lives can't stand how much his microphone reverberated through the minds of Americans. Those people will one day be forgotten, but America will never forget Charlie and the movement that he helped build. We now owe it to CK to carry on the fight to build a nation centered around faith, family, and freedom. We owe him more than our grief. We owe him victory.
2
77
Truth!
Charlie was a beloved friend, an unflinching ally, and an indispensable warrior for America. He was murdered not only by an evil assassin but an entire ecosystem of far-left extremism that normalizes, justifies and glorifies violence against its political opponents. The success of America depends upon the dismantlement of these violent networks. As we grieve an unimaginable loss, we pledge ourselves to accelerate the work for which Charlie gave his very life. No one can remain on the sidelines when the stakes are so vast.
54
The GrokAI has given me the keys to breaking out of account purgatory. 1) Don't post as much. 2) Don't retweet as much. 3) Don't use emojis so much. I can see what @elonmusk and @nikitabier were thinking... "Identify the behavior of spam accounts, and reduce the weight in the algorithm of certain types of post to reduce the amplification of real humans." Honorable pursuit, but horribly executed. Your premise missed one glaring and massive truth... The behavior the bot accounts were most mimicking was humans. That's why the accounts were effective. So rather than address the problem some other way, you quite literally targeted the most innate and natural posting style for 99% of your users. Then... you decided it was easier to reprogram the entire internet on how to use, interact, and participate in the global conversation by having them behave the way your AI algorithm prefers. Fail. Fail. Fail. I'm not saying I know the answer to your problem, but this ain't it. @elonmusk I'm begging you to hire actual popular, charismatic, non-nerd staff. Why? You have socially inept, introvert, awkward geniuses training the algorithm for SOCIAL MEDIA. Let me repeat... SOCIAL MEDIA. Respectfully, what do mega big brain nerds know about healthy, nuanced, social interaction and popular trends? The answer is "nothing." ...and the longer this goes on, the worse it gets. You aren't eliminating bots from the platform, you're simply training human beings to behave more like bots and it's staring you right in the face. I've been here 18 years. My brain is obnoxiously programmed to recognize patterns (which is why I'm good at politics and cultural shifts). This algorithm is hands down the worst one I've ever seen utilized. I am a super fan. Please do not take offense to what I absolutely know is the truth.
85
Greg_Alexson retweeted
I don't think people really understand the fight between Paul Graham and Palmer Luckey which played out this week. To the general public, from a casual perspective, it seemed like two rich guys getting in a heated, impulsive debate on Twitter, dragging out for days. It's not. Paul is worth ~$2.5 billion. Palmer is worth ~$5 billion. Nothing these guys do is impulsive. They've been sitting on this for years. They were arguing in private for months, maybe years, before Palmer decided this week was the correct window of opportunity to make a public attack. Paul Graham is one of the intellectual fulcrum points of Silicon Valley. He funds everyone. He sets the tone. He shapes the agenda. Entry-level professionals mimic his style, his worldview, his mannerisms, the way Paul talks. Everyone parrots his beliefs and policies and essays, as chameleon strivers who are trying to get ahead and climb the social ladder. All of Silicon Valley revolves around a handful of key figures, and Paul Graham was (perceived as) one of the intellectual titans who the entire industry orbited as sycophants. Palmer challenged all that. Paul is an elite, Palmer is an elite, and Palmer Luckey chose to publicly challenge the status quo; the elite consensus; the perceived legitimacy of incumbent elits and their institutions. And he did this for a reason: Palmer is aiming to take the role of Paul Graham, of being the new intellectual godfather of Silicon Valley, based around a new set of ideas: reindustrialization, patriotism, protectionism... rather than America as a deracinated cosmopolitan economic zone to be strip-mined by Third World foreigners. It's much bigger than a Twitter argument. Palmer was publicly demonstrating that the Emperor had no clothes, and that he was strong enough to MOG Paul Graham and get away with it, while other Silicon Valley tech workers would be terrified of making an enemy who could suffocate future business ventures and block potential funding. Palmer Luckey is the face of a new military-industrialist consensus which is seeking to hire American workers for American jobs, to build factories and weapons at home, to remilitarize and reindustrialize, to get away from asset inflation and FIRE (finance, insurance, real estate) as a sterile, parasitic rent-seeking economic system. That's the subtext for all of this. It's a public signal of a rising counterelite challenging a stagnant, ossified status quo which can no longer justify or defend their own claim to power.
383
1,644
196
15,005
867,546