Dr HalstedButNoCocaine

// Literally everything you have said has been stated in my post clearly. You have come into my replies trying to disagree when the post clearly lays out exactly what you are saying. Re-read it. Specially read the limitations and disclaimers. Improve your English language reading comprehension, I will re-read Harrison’s, I do that with every new edition without your recommendation. // Let me explain You shared a test and wrote about it That is OK But What does that test do Why is that test done This part you missed it That test is to check whether there is block in ICA Do you understand this at least now Now The very purpose of Harrison including this test in the book is because many people have blocks in ICA Circulation or ECA Circulation Is this clear to you at least now If there is no block in any one, this test itself is not needed This test is needed because people may have blocks You too said the same “to determine whether blood is reaching the brain through alternative pathways.” “In severe internal carotid artery disease, blood can reach the intracranial circulation through collateral connections between the external carotid artery and vessels around the eye.“ “can infer that the normal route supplying the brain is compromised and that collateral circulation has developed.” Did you post all these without basic understanding Now @deepigoyal is marketing a device that measures blood flow in STA (ECA Circulation) and with that talks about Brain Flow This device is a fraud device because This device will wrongly say the blood flow to brain is good even in people who have blocks in ICA Circulation because it measures only STA and not ICA Do you understand this So Essentially This test will say that brain flow is good in those with good STA and Good ICA. That is OK This test will also say that brain flow is good in those with blocked ICA. This part is dangerous. We are trying to point is to @deepigoyal and @agingroy but either they are too stupid to not understand this or too fraud to feign ignorance You yourself told about collaterals So Blood flow in ECA Can be more during ICA Blocks But this device will wrong say that ICA Flow is more Hence this is a dangerous device PS : I am questioning the technology of the device I am saying that Measuring STA and then concluding about ICA flow is stupid and dangerous. Now 1. You share a test which talks about blocks 2. You support a device which does not consider possibility of block and gives false assurance to users Either you are an idiot who did not understand the purpose of the test you shared or You are a fraud who tries to legitimize another fraud //If you say there is “no doubt” about a novel device then surely you have some evidence to back that up too?// Yes The evidence has been given by @deepigoyal and @agingroy themselves here I have explained in the following tweets 1. nitter.gq/spinesurgeon/status/21… 2. nitter.gq/spinesurgeon/status/21… 3. nitter.gq/spinesurgeon/status/21… // Anyone can conduct studies when it releases. I will do so, specifically because I’m curious. // Ok I can say that the patient is dead when torso and neck are seperate People with less Brain capacity may need an ECG Each one his way //This is a wellness wearable. Not a medical device. Please read the CDSCO rules on what sort of premarket studies are required for such devices. There is no regulatory burden to perform the sort of studies you’re demanding. Why is should we apply your personal standard over that of CDSCO?// You are wrong here I am not demanding any study I have already concluded that this is a fraud