I was mad at Grok 4.7, but then it helped me find another way to explain "circular reasoning" in Einstein's Special Relativity paper. 😆
GPT 5.6 Sol also agrees that Einstein's re-derivation attempt of Voigt's Doppler Transforms are circular.
Grok link:
grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5LWNvc…
Replying to @Magus_of_Mind
Planck length is theoretical and derived from Planck's constant, which is generally misunderstood. Scientifically, 'h' is the minimum amplitude of an electromagnetic wave (as far as we discovered it).
Our Ummo space brothers mention the minimum length is 12^-13 cm (femtometer).
Replying to @Shaun_Fosmark
Electromagnetic Energy = mass * (per permittivity) * (per permeability) of the electromagnetic medium.
The dielectric and magnetic inductions could be successive points that create 3d spherical waves.
The so called "photon" becomes an induction point of the medium.
Replying to @HeliosYourSun
How does the scam fly around like it did in the stabilized video and maintain the precession wobble?
Replying to @demystifysci
And Heaviside blasting the Brits and Royal Society is always good. He saw Einstein's grift...
Replying to @demystifysci
Wait, but that isn't correct. Heaviside proved that wrong with the telegraph equation that created the long distance communication industry.
That created Pupin Coils to help with balancing capacitance with more inductance.
Replying to @SonOfClawDraws
Re: "The Lorentz transformation preserves that null interval."
No. Fantasy physics that doesn't recognize the math as the Voigt Doppler transforms preserves the null interval out of ignorance.
Just read Klinaku's work. He unified Voigt's special case, Doppler work.
Replying to @SonOfClawDraws
Re: "does it recover the same observables as GR without inserting them independently?"
GR just claims to be "curving spacetime." Those spacetime transforms are Voigt's Doppler effect for the medium, so Einstein's tensorization of Newton's G is just pressure/density of medium.
Replying to @SonOfClawDraws
Re: "spacetime curvature"
This is a lie. It's simply a change in permeability and permittivity of the EM medium.
SPACETIME means you believe that two people that are moving away from each other are BOTH centered in a spherical wave pulse!
You can't be that stupid, can you?🤷♂️
Replying to @engineers_feed
Einstein got the photoelectric "law" wrong!
Millikan found wave resonance in the photoelectric experiments, which Einstein's law doesn't predict.
Einstein just combined Planck's Math (e=hv) and Owen Richard's workfunction.
Einstein's SR is Voigt's 1887 Doppler Transform math.
Replying to @thewreathwright
We have not properly understood the "electric body" of our human bodies. Electrical science was partly ruined by Einsteiners.
Start with the "silver chord".
Recognize the physical process learning progression described by Ummo.
Replying to @ParadigmGauge
When you understand where the transform math is properly derived, then you understand the constant "c" in the preferred reference frame wave medium is still a constant speed in the moving frame, but with wave timing and spacing changed (via +/- v), not "time and space."
So Einstein's issue is to translate the asymmetric "c" reference frame into a symmetric "c", which is all about "the moving frame." Einstein focuses on Tau (wave period changes of the Doppler) using the light signal "timing" (periodicity).
His derivation requires TWO separate light emitters to synchronize clocks in both frames, which is a problem! You cannot sync BOTH frames with a single light pulse, until the spherical wave proof using the transforms! Wave periodicity changes automatically occurs in the Doppler Effect for the moving frame.
Therefore, the moving frame midpoint equation REQUIRES its own light emitting source that is DEPENDENT on STATIONARY motion in that frame or moving with +v relativity to the stationary frame. The derivation starts with that self-conflicting emitter motion trickery to obtain "c" in empty space for "both frames", but then prove "c" in empty space for both frames using the transforms and meet the emitter motion postulate requirement.
The spherical wave proof takes a single light pulse and makes it two different sphere that are moving away from each other. Completely illogical.
It really transforms into an ellipse and tells the change in timing and spacing.














































